Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:13:51.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tradeoff between reproduction and resistance evolution to Bt-toxin in Helicoverpa armigera: regulated by vitellogenin gene expression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2014

W.N. Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
H.J. Xiao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China Institute of Entomology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
G.M. Liang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
Y.Y. Guo
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
K.M. Wu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
*
*Author for correspondence: Phone: +86 10 61815929 Fax: +86 10 61815929 E-mail: gmliang@ippcaas.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolution of resistance to insecticides usually has fitness tradeoffs associated with adaptation to the stress. The basic regulation mechanism of tradeoff between reproduction and resistance evolution to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Ha), based on the vitellogenin (Vg) gene expression was analyzed here. The full-length cDNA of the Vg gene HaVg (JX504706) was cloned and identified. HaVg has 5704 base pairs (bp) with an open reading frame (ORF) of 5265 bp, which encoded 1756 amino acid protein with a predicted molecular mass of 197.28 kDa and a proposed isoelectric point of 8.74. Sequence alignment analysis indicated that the amino acid sequence of HaVg contained all of the conserved domains detected in the Vgs of the other insects and had a high similarity with the Vgs of the Lepidoptera insects, especially Noctuidae. The resistance level to Cry1Ac Bt toxin and relative HaVg mRNA expression levels among the following four groups: Cry1Ac-susceptible strain (96S), Cry1Ac-resistant strain fed on artificial diet with Bt toxin for 135 generations (BtR stands for the Cry1Ac Bt resistance), progeny of the Cry1Ac-resistant strain with a non-Bt-toxin artificial diet for 38 generations (CK1) and the direct descendants of the 135th-generation resistant larvae which were fed on an artificial diet without the Cry1Ac protein (CK2) were analyzed. Compared with the 96S strain, the resistance ratios of the BtR strain, the CK1 strain and the CK2 strain were 2917.15-, 2.15- and 2037.67-fold, respectively. The maximum relative HaVg mRNA expression levels of the BtR strain were approximately 50% less than that of the 96S strain, and the coming of maximum expression was delayed for approximately 4 days. The overall trend of the HaVg mRNA expression levels in the CK1 strain was similar to that in the 96S strain, and the overall trend of the HaVg mRNA expression levels in the CK2 strain was similar to that in the BtR strain. Our results suggest that the changes in reproduction due to the Bt-toxin resistance evolution in the BtR strain may be regulated by the Vg gene expression. The down-regulation of HaVg at the early stages resulted in a period of delayed reproduction and decreased fecundity in the BtR strain. This performance disappeared when the Bt-toxin selection pressure was lost.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Introduction

Genetically modified (GM) crops containing the insecticidal proteins from Bt have become an important tool for pest management (Raybould, Reference Raybould2012). However, the widespread cultivation of Bt crops increases the probability that the pests will evolve selectively resistance toward these insecticidal proteins (Wu & Guo, Reference Wu and Guo2005). Cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) is one of the major pests worldwide (Fitt, Reference Fitt1989; Luttrell et al., Reference Luttrell, Fitt, Ramalho and Sugonyaev1994; Guo, Reference Guo1997). It has been effectively controlled by transgenic cotton that expresses the Bt-toxin Cry1Ac (James, Reference James2007; Tabashnik et al., Reference Tabashnik, Gassmann, Crowder and Carriere2008; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Lu, Feng, Jiang and Zhao2008). The evolution of the resistance by target pests such as H. armigera could reduce the efficacy of Bt cotton (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Wu, Jiang, Guo and Desneux2012; Tabashnik et al., Reference Tabashnik, Wu and Wu2012). Selection for the H. armigera-resistant strains has already been conducted in laboratories in China, Australia and India (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Tan and Guo2000; Akhurst et al., Reference Akhurst, James, Bird and Beard2003; Tabashnik et al., Reference Tabashnik, Carriere, Dennehy, Morin, Sisterson, Roush, Shelton and Zhao2003; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Tian, Zhao, Jin, Yang, Liu, Yang, Wu, Wu, Cui, Tabashnik and Wu2012). And in our laboratory several Bt-resistant strains of H. armigera have been developed with their mechanism of resistance investigated (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Tan and Guo2000; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Guo and Gao2002a , Reference Wu, Guo, Lv, Greenplate and Deaton b ; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Li, Gao, Ning and Wu2010). Induction of the Bt-toxin resistance in the H. armigera strains affected reproduction in a variety of ways, including reducing the incidence of successful mating, changing the fitness and decreasing reproducibility as the resistance level increased (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Wu, Yu, Li, Feng and Guo2008; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Wu, Liang and Guo2008). However, the mechanism of these phenomena is still unknown.

Vitellogenin is not only the major nutrient of the embryo but also a precursor protein of egg yolk (Hagedorn et al., Reference Hagedorn, Maddison and Tu1998; Sappington & Raikhel, Reference Sappington and Raikhel1998). Recently, genomic and transcript sequences for Vgs from numerous species have been recorded in GenBank, including insects (Li et al., Reference Li, Sadasivam and Ding2003; Ye et al., Reference Ye, Dong, Song, Shi, Chen and Hu2008; Shu et al., Reference Shu, Zhou, Tang, Lu, Zhou and Zhang2009; Tufail & Takeda, Reference Tufail and Takeda2009; Tufail et al., Reference Tufail, Naeemullah, Elmogy, Sharma, Takeda and Nakamura2010) and some copepod species (Hwang et al., Reference Hwang, Lee, Han, Park, Lee, Lee and Lee2010). In most insects, Vgs are synthesized in the fat body, secreted into the hemolymph, then incorporated into the developing oocytes (Tufail & Takeda, Reference Tufail and Takeda2008). Apart from providing nutrition, Vgs also participate in the synthesis of brood food, transport of zinc, longevity, the immune system, etc. (Nakamura et al., Reference Nakamura, Yasuda, Adachi, Sakurai, Ishii and Goto1999; Guidugli et al., Reference Guidugli, Piulachs, Belles, Lourenco and Simoes2005; Amdam et al., Reference Amdam, Norberg, Page, Erber and Scheiner2006; Cervera et al., Reference Cervera, Maymo, Martinez-Pardo and Garcera2006; Corona et al., Reference Corona, Velarde, Remolina, Moran-Laute, Wang, Hughes and Robinson2007; Hwang et al., Reference Hwang, Lee, Han, Park, Lee, Lee and Lee2010; Havukainen et al., Reference Havukainen, Halskau and Amdam2011).

An identification of the correlation between the resistance to the Bt-toxin and reproduction could be valuable for a better understanding of the resistance evolution and determining the mechanisms to manage resistance. In this article, the correlation between the resistance evolution to the Bt-toxin and the reproduction in H. armigera was examined by analyzing the Vg gene expression. Here, we cloned and identified the Vg gene from H. armigera (HaVg) for the first time. Then, the relative mRNA expression levels of HaVg were systematically investigated in different Bt-toxin strains. Our results demonstrate one of the regulation mechanisms in the reproductive cost of the resistance evolution to the Bt-toxin in H. armigera, which is based on an HaVg mRNA expression pattern.

Materials and methods

Insect strains

The cotton bollworm, H. armigera, used in this study was originally collected from the cotton fields in Xinxiang County, Henan Province of China in 1996. The Cry1Ac-susceptible strain (96S) had been reared on an artificial diet without any exposure to chemical insecticides or the Bt-toxin in the laboratory since 1996. Meanwhile, the Cry1Ac-resistant strain (BtR) was derived from 96S using an artificial diet with the Cry1Ac toxin (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Tan and Guo2000). During the selection process, to ensure that the samples had a common genetic background, the BtR strain was crossed with the 96S strain in the 27th, 49th and 87th generations, which would minimize the development of the other differences between the two strains. In this study, the BtR strain had been selected for 135 generations, the Cry1Ac protein concentration in the 135th generation was 550 μg ml−1. Since the 97th generation, the selected strain has been separated into two groups, one group of the progeny was transferred to an artificial diet without the Bt-toxin, till the test it had been kept on a common artificial diet for 38 generations (CK1). A part of the 135th-generation resistant larvae were fed on an artificial diet without the Cry1Ac protein and their offspring also were tested (CK2). All of the groups of insects were reared in the laboratory on an artificial diet at 27±2 °C, 75±10% RH and a photoperiod of L 14 h: D 10 h (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Wu, Yu, Li, Feng and Guo2008), respectively. The female and male adults were placed in cages (30 cm×60 cm×30 cm) for mating and oviposition.

Bioassays and resistance level to Cry1Ac

The susceptibility of the four groups was tested after amending the diet surface overlay bioassays described in Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Wei, Zhao, Jin, Yang, Wu, Tabashnik and Wu2011). A definite amount of liquid artificial diet was dispensed into each well of a 24-well plate. After the diet got cooled and solidified, 60 μl of the Na2CO3 buffer solution containing different concentrations of the Cry1Ac protein was applied evenly to the diet surface in each well and allowed to air dry (the suspensions of the Cry1Ac protein were diluted with a 0.05 M, pH 11.4, Na2CO3 buffer solution), then a single first instar larva was placed in each well. For a diagnostic concentration of the Cry1Ac protein, each treatment had three biological replicates, including a blank control only added Na2CO3 liquid. After a treatment of 7 days, the larval mortality was recorded. The lethal concentration of 50% (LC50) was analyzed by probit regression using Polo program (Russell et al., Reference Russell, Robertson and Savin1977). The resistance ratio was calculated as the LC50 for the strain progeny from a cross-division by the LC50 for the susceptible strain (96S).

Tissue sampling and cloning of HaVg gene

Male and female individuals of H. armigera in different groups were separated at the 2nd day after pupation. To determine the expression profiles, female samples at different stages of H. armigera were collected from four different groups’ development. The newly formed pupae (3rd day), the late phase pupae (10th day) and the emerged adults of different strains were collected every day after eclosion. Then, the pupae and the adults were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and were stored at −80 °C before RNA isolation.

Different tissues from the female adults, including fat body, ovary, hemolymph, cuticle, head, antenna, gut and malpighian tubule (six individual tissues as a treatment), were collected on the 3rd day after eclosion, and stored as mentioned above.

Total RNA was extracted with the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer's recommendation. The SuperScript™ III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) was used to synthesize the cDNA. According to the expressed sequence tag (EST) sequence from the suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) library constructed in our lab (data not shown), the Tm622 F and the Tm25 R primers (table 1) were designed to amplify the partial mRNA sequence of Vg near the 3′ end. Degenerate primers (Havg-F1/Havg-R1 and Havg-F2/Havg-R2 (table 1), respectively) were designed to amplify a fragment of Vg near the 5′ end. The gene-specific primers (Havg-F3 and Havg-R3, respectively (table 1)) were used to study the sex expression of HaVg. PCR reactions were performed for 40 cycles.

Table 1. Primers used for vitellogenin sequencing.

Rapid amplification of the cDNA ends (RACE) method was performed to amplify the 3′ and the 5′ ends of the Vg genes with a SMARTTM RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and specific primers (Havg-5′R1/Havg-5′R2 for the 5′end and HaVg3′F1 for the 3′end (table 1), respectively) according to the manufacturer's protocol. PCR reactions were performed for five cycles of 30 s at 94 °C and 3 min at 72 °C; 5 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 70 °C and 3 min at 72 °C; and 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 68 °C and 3 min at 72 °C, respectively. To ensure that the entire open reading frame (ORF) was amplified, specific primers were designed according to the 5′ and the 3′ untranslated region sequences and were used to amplify the entire ORF sequences (ORF-F1/ORF-R1 (table 1)).

The nucleotide and the deduced amino acid sequences of the HaVg protein were analyzed using the ExPaSy proteomics server website (http://www.expasy.org). The signal peptide position and the transmembrane helices were analyzed using TMHMM v. 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/). Percent identity of the amino acid sequences was calculated using ClustalW (Thompson et al., Reference Thompson, Higgins and Gibson1994). The phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA 5.0, using the neighbor-joining method (Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Peterson, Peterson, Stecher, Nei and Kumar2011).

Tissue and temporal expression patterns in the Bt-toxin susceptible and resistance strains

The relative mRNA expression levels of Vg in the different strains during the various stages of development were analyzed by a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Each qRT-PCR reaction contained the following components: 1 μl of the template cDNA, 2*Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara, Japan), 0.2 μM of each primer and 0.4 μM of the probe. An ABI 7500 Fast Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) was used to run the reactions. qRT-PCR was performed for 40 cycles of 95 °C 15 s and 60 °C 34 s, respectively. The Vg gene expression was normalized with the double reference genes β-actin (Accession no. EU527017) and GAPDH (accession no. JF417983) and the comparative CT method (2−ΔΔCt) (Livak & Schmittgen, Reference Livak and Schmittgen2001) was used to analyze the data. The primers and the fluorescein amidite (FAM) probes are shown in table 1.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 9.0. The development of the different stages was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons were conducted using Bonferroni multiple post hoc comparison test. Different Bt-toxin-susceptible and resistant strains were compared using paired Student t-test.

Results

Bioassays test in a different group

The bioassay data are shown in table 2. Compared with the susceptible strain (96S), the resistance strain (BtR) had a 2917.15-fold resistance to the Cry1Ac protein. The resistance ratios of CK1 and CK2 were 2.15-fold and 2037.67-fold, respectively. The results showed that the resistance of the resistant strain (BtR, which had a higher resistance to Cry1Ac) decreased very rapidly when the selection pressure was removed, the resistance ratio reduced from 2917.15-fold to 2037.67-fold after one generation, and reached to less than 2.15-fold after 38 generations.

Table 2. Toxicity and resistance ratio against Cry1Ac in the four H. armigera groups.

Resistance ratio: resistance strain LC50/susceptible strain LC50.

Amino acid sequence of HaVg and a comparison with the other insects

The Vg cDNA is 5704 nt in size containing an ATG start codon (nt 59–61), a TAA stop codon (nt 5327–5329), a putative poly-A addition signal (nt 5442–5446) and a poly-A tail (nt 5678–5704), respectively. HaVg has an ORF 5265 nt encoding for the 1765 amino acid protein with a calculated molecular weight of 197.28 kDa (GenBank accession no. JX504706). It was only expressed in the female moths of H. armigera (fig. 1). SignalP analysis indicated that the first 19 amino acids represented the signal peptides (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) search predicted the following three conserved domains within the amino-acid sequence of HaVg: the Vg–N domain or the lipoprotein amino-terminal region, the DUF 1943 domain and a Von Willebrand factor type D domain (VWD) (amino acid positions: 54–439, 584–732 and 1364–1537, respectively). In addition, two polyserine regions, an RXXR consensus cleavage site, a GL/ICG motif and cysteine residues, respectively, were identified (fig. 2). The cleavage signal RARR HaVg was anticipated to be between the amino acids 353 and 356. Upon cleavage, two subunits with the predicted MWs 160.882  and 39.988 kD would be produced.

Fig. 1. RT-PCR analysis of the sex specific expression of the Helicoverpa armigera Vg. ♀ is the female adult sample, ♂ is the male adult sample and M is the weight maker (2000 bp ladder), respectively.

Fig. 2. Alignment of the Vg sequences in Lepidoptera. Alignment of the deducted amino acid sequences from HaVg (Helicoverpa armigera Vg, GenBank accession no. JX504706), SlVg (Spodoptera litura Vg, ABU68426), ApVg (Antheraea pernyi Vg, BAB16412), AyVg (Antheraea yamamai Vg, BAB32640), AsVg (Actias selene Vg, ADB94560), BmVg (Bombyx mandarina Vg, BAE47146), CmVg (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Vg, AEM75020), BmVgP (Bombyx mori Vg precursor, NP_001037309), LdVg (Lymantria dispar Vg, AAB03336), ScpVg (Samia cynthia pryeri Vg, BAD91196), ScrVg (Samia cynthia ricini Vg, BAB32641) and SjVg (Saturnia japonica Vg, BAD91195). The highly conserved regions are highlighted. The GICG motif, the RXRR cleavage site motif and the DGXR motif are indicated in the sequence. The polyserine tracts are labeled by the black frame.

The deduced amino-acid sequence of HaVg was aligned with the corresponding sequences of the other Lepidoptera insects. HaVg had a high similarity (51–72%) to Vgs of the other Lepidoptera insects and was 72% similar to Spodoptera litura (Supplementary Table S1). The alignment showed that the GL/ICG motif, the DGXR motif and the cysteine residues located near the C-terminal were highly conserved among the Lepidoptera insect Vgs (fig. 2). A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the distances of the amino acid sequences between H. armigera and the other insects. A phylogenetic analysis clustered the H. armigera Vg into the Lepidoptera Vg subfamily (fig. 3).

Fig. 3. A molecular phylogenetic (neighbor-joining) tree based on the entire amino acid sequence of Vg for forty insects and five non-insect species.

HaVg mRNA expression in the tissue

The qRT-PCR was used to probe the tissue- and the stage-specific expressions of the HaVg gene. The relative mRNA expression level of HaVg was extremely high in the fat body compared to other tissues (ANOVA, F=20.13, DF=7, 24, P<0.0001) (fig. 4a). The relative expression of Vg in the fat body was low at 6–24 h after eclosion. The relative mRNA expression levels rose drastically at 48 h after eclosion, and then began to decrease (ANOVA, F=120.59, DF=4, 10, P<0.0001, multicomparison by the Bonferroni test: P<0.0001 between 24 and 48 or 72 h; P=0.074 among 6, 12 and 24 h; P=0.295 between 48 and 72 h) (fig. 4b).

Fig. 4. Tissue expression levels of the HaVg mRNA detected by qRT-PCR. (a) Relative expression levels of the HaVg mRNA in different tissues. All of the expression levels of the HaVg mRNA in the tissues were compared with that in the fat body. (b) Relative expression levels of the HaVg mRNA in the female fat body at different stages of development. Take the expression level of the HaVg mRNA at 6 h after emergence as the control group, the levels in the other times were compared with that in the control group. The data represent the mean±SE for at least four repeats normalized relative to the double reference genes transcript level (β-actin and GAPDH). The differences are considered statistically significant at the P<0.05 level.

Temporal pattern of HaVg mRNA expression in different strains

The developmental expression pattern of Vg demonstrated that HaVg was first transcribed in the early pupal stage. The expression level of the Vg gene fluctuated significantly during the developmental stages and had a maximum expression level in the 3rd day female adults in the 96S strain (ANOVA, F=23.45, DF=10, 33, P<0.0001). In the BtR strains, the maximum expression level of Vg was found in the 7-day-old female adults. Meanwhile, the relative expression level was approximately 50% less than that of the 3rd day female adults in the 96S strain (fig. 5). The Vg mRNA expression level of 96S was significantly higher in the late pupal stage, on the 3rd (t-test, P<0.0001) and the 6th (t-test, P=0.0057) day adults than that of the BtR strain. In the later phase of adult development, days 7–9, the relative Vg mRNA expression levels were reversed, and the BtR strain was significantly higher than the 96S strain (t-test, P<0.05) (Supplementary Table S2). Furthermore, the relative expression levels of HaVg, which was the highest in the 3rd day female in the CK1 strain, was significantly higher on the 2nd to the 4th days than the HaVg expression level in the CK2 strain (t-test, P<0.05) (Supplementary Table S2). In the later phase of development, the HaVg expression level was significantly higher in the CK2 strain than in the CK1 strain in the 5th and the 6th day females (t-test, P<0.05) (Supplementary Table S2). Therefore, from the comparison of the Vg mRNA expression levels among the four different strains, the expression level of the Vg mRNA in the CK1 strain was similar to the 96S strain whereas the CK2 strain was similar to the BtR strain (fig. 5).

Fig. 5. The quantity real time PCR analysis of the HaVg mRNA expression levels in the whole body of the Helicoverpa armigera females at different developmental stages in the 96S, BtR, CK1 and CK2 strains, respectively. The RNA samples were extracted from the whole bodies of the pupa at different stages after eclosion. The data represents the mean±SE for at least four repeats with β-actin and GAPDH as the double reference normalized genes. A statistical comparison by the Student's t-test in pairs by strain is listed in Supplementary Table S2.

Discussion

The Bt-toxins influence selection in insect fitness and the evolution of the insect resistance which threatened the successful production of transgenic crops (Gonzalez et al., Reference Gonzalez-Cabrera, Escriche, Tabashnik and Ferre2003; Tabashnik et al., Reference Tabashnik, Dennehy and Carriere2005,  Reference Tabashnik, Gassmann, Crowder and Carriere2008). Several studies indicate that the fitness costs affect the reproduction of H. armigera (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Wu, Rector and Guo2007; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Wu and Guo2007, Reference Zhao, Wu, Liang and Guo2008; Tabashnik et al., Reference Tabashnik, Gassmann, Crowder and Carriere2008). Studies have also shown that reproductive maturation is regulated by the Vg protein (Telfer, Reference Telfer2009). Before entering adulthood, the primary oocytes have already developed within the follicular cell of the ovary, while the synthesis and the uptake of yolk protein (vitellogenesis) remain incomplete in most insects (Sappington & Raikhel, Reference Sappington and Raikhel1998). In the present study, the bioassay showed that the resistance of the resistant strain decreased very rapidly when the selection pressure was removed. The resistance ratio dropped from 2917.33-fold to 2037.67-fold in just one generation. The resistance of CK1 kept a relatively stable low resistance level (2.15-fold) afterwards without selection pressure for 38 generations (table 2). Zou et al. (Reference Zou, Li, Zhang, Wei, Liang and Guo2012) also found that the resistance would be regained quickly by reselection using Cry1Ac, the hatchability and the survival rate of the larvae reduced as the resistance ratio rose.

In recent years, the Vg cDNA sequences of many insects have been cloned to facilitate an examination of the Vg expression levels in different growth periods, tissues and ovary development (Tufail & Takeda, Reference Tufail and Takeda2008). Previous studies have indicated that the insect Vg sequences have common features such as the VWD domain (Baker, Reference Baker1988), the GL/ICG motif and DUF 1943 (Thompson & Banaszak, Reference Thompson and Banaszak2002). Recent studies have reported that the C-terminal region and the VWD domain of Vg are processed and attached to the vitelline coat which participates in fertilization as the binding partner of the sperm proteases (Akasaka et al., Reference Akasaka, Harada and Sawada2010). HaVg shared common motifs with other insects, such as the putative RXXR cleavage cite (RARR), the conserved GL/ICG domain and the DGXR motif (fig. 2), respectively. The conserved polyserine tracts at the N-terminus of most insect Vg sequences are also found in the H. armigera Vg (fig. 2). Some insects do not have this conserved sequence (Hiremath & Lehtoma, Reference Hiremath and Lehtoma1997; Ye et al., Reference Ye, Dong, Song, Shi, Chen and Hu2008; Shu et al., Reference Shu, Zhou, Tang, Lu, Zhou and Zhang2009) or have more than one polyserine tract (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Sappington and Raikhel1997; Koywiwattrakul & Sittipraneed, Reference Koywiwattrakul and Sittipraneed2009). Vitellogenins are complex (200–700 kDa) homologous phosphor proteins that often oligomerize in their native state and have a PI of 6.1–6.4 (Tufail &Takeda, Reference Tufail and Takeda2008). After modification, the Vg monomers of most insects consist of 1–4 subunits, with the larger ones being >180 kDa and the smaller ones being <50 kDa (Pateraki & Stratakis, Reference Pateraki and Stratakis2000; Tufail & Takeda, Reference Tufail and Takeda2008; Provost-Javier et al., Reference Provost-Javier, Chen and Rasgon2010). Through the NCBI conserved domain search, three domains were identified in HaVg. The HaVg gene with an ORF of 5265 nucleotides would encode a protein of 1756 amino acids with a calculated MW of 197.28 kDa and a PI of 8.74. The HaVg transcript was expressed at high levels in the female fat body and found in low traces in the other tissues (fig. 4). This process was investigated during the Vg synthesis (Tufail & Takeda, Reference Tufail and Takeda2009).

The peak expression level of HaVg in the BtR strain was about 4 days later compared to the Bt-toxin-susceptible strain. The mRNA expression level of HaVg was significantly down-regulated on the 3rd day after eclosion in the BtR strain compared with the 96S strain (fig. 5). Furthermore, the 3rd day is the key point for Vg generation. The Vg protein, a main nutritional source stored in the ovary, was detected 1 day after the Vg mRNA first appeared (Shinoda et al., Reference Shinoda, Miura, Taylor and Chinzei1996; Hirai et al., Reference Hirai, Watanabe, Kiyota and Chinzei1998; Tufail et al., Reference Tufail, Lee, Hatakeyama, Oishi and Takeda2000; Piulachs et al., Reference Piulachs, Guidugli, Barchuk, Cruz, Simões and Bellés2003; Ye et al., Reference Ye, Dong, Song, Shi, Chen and Hu2008). Therefore, after the first 3 days, the ovary had stored enough nutrition for the embryo. However, the Vg mRNA expressed maximally on the 3rd day after eclosion in the Cry-1Ac susceptible female adult, while it reached maximally on the 7th day in the Cry-1Ac resistant female adult (fig. 5). The other studies have indicated that the amount of Vg accumulated in the first 3 days was 70% of all of the proteins expressed and this high production was maintained throughout the adult life of Apis mellifera (Guidugli et al., Reference Guidugli, Piulachs, Belles, Lourenco and Simoes2005). Therefore, the result in our study reveals one of the reasons why oviposition in the Bt-toxin-resistant strains was significantly lower and delayed compared to that of the susceptible strains (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Wu, Yu, Li, Feng and Guo2008; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Wu, Liang and Guo2008). Considering that the susceptible and the resistant strains were fed different diets and that the resistant strain was screened for 135 generations, it is possible that the down-regulation of the HaVg mRNA expression level is related to the diet. However, this hypothesis was refuted by the expression patterns in the strains of CK1 and CK2. The results indicated that in the CK1 HaVg expressed maximally on the 3rd day after eclosion, which was similar to the susceptible strain, and that the HaVg expression in the CK2 was similar to the BtR strain (fig. 5).

Our study revealed the molecular characterization of Vg in H. armigera for the first time. The expression of the HaVg mRNA in the BtR strain was postponed compared with the 96S strain, which supports the tradeoff hypothesis between the reproductive cost and the Bt-toxin resistance evolution. The down-regulation of the HaVg mRNA level was only partially restored after 38 generations. It can be speculated that removing the Bt pressure may slow the resistance evolution in the field. Vg protein synthesis and egg production were regulated not only by the Vg gene but also by the other hormones and genes (Sappington & Raikhel, Reference Sappington and Raikhel1998). And the Vg protein synthesis, which played a direct role in the insect reproduction, had a positive correlation with the Vg mRNA expression in some insects (Hirai et al., Reference Hirai, Watanabe, Kiyota and Chinzei1998; Ye et al., Reference Ye, Dong, Song, Shi, Chen and Hu2008). To better understand the relationship between Vg and the reproductive cost of the resistance evolution to the Bt-toxin, systematic investigations, including the yolk protein level, fecundity in different strains and the JH regulation mechanisms will be conducted in the future.

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/BER

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Supported Project (2012BAD19B05).

Footnotes

Both of the authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

References

Akasaka, M., Harada, Y. & Sawada, H. (2010) Vitellogenin C-terminal fragments participate in fertilization as egg-coat binding partners of sperm trypsin-like proteases in the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi . Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 392, 479484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akhurst, R.J., James, W., Bird, L.J. & Beard, C. (2003) Resistance to the Cry1Ac delta-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 12901299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amdam, G.V., Norberg, K., Page, R.E., Erber, J. & Scheiner, R. (2006) Downregulation of vitellogenin gene activity increases the gustatory responsiveness of honey bee workers (Apis mellifera). Behavioral Brain Research 169, 201205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, M.E. (1988) Invertebrate vitellogenin is homologous to human von Willebrand factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 256, 10591061.Google ScholarPubMed
Cervera, A., Maymo, A.C., Martinez-Pardo, R. & Garcera, M.D. (2006) Vitellogenin polypeptide levels in one susceptible and one cadmium-resistant strain of Oncopeltus fasciatus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae), and its role in cadmium resistance. Journal of Insect Physiology 52, 158168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J.S., Sappington, T.W. & Raikhel, A.S. (1997) Extensive sequence conservation among insect, nematode, and vertebrate vitellogenins reveals ancient common ancestry. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44, 440451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corona, M., Velarde, R.A., Remolina, S., Moran-Laute, A., Wang, Y., Hughes, K.A. & Robinson, G.E. (2007) Vitellogenin, juvenile hormone, insulin signaling, and queen honey bee longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 71287133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitt, G.P. (1989) The ecology of Heliothissp in relation to agro ecological system. Annual Review of Entomology 34, 1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Cabrera, J., Escriche, B., Tabashnik, B.E. & Ferre, J. (2003) Binding of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in resistant and susceptible strains of pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 33, 929935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guidugli, K.R., Piulachs, M.D., Belles, X., Lourenco, A.P. & Simoes, Z.L. (2005) Vitellogenin expression in queen ovaries and in larvae of both sexes of Apis mellifera . Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 59, 211218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Y.Y. (1997) Progress in the researches on migration regularity of Helicoverpa armigera and relationships between the pest and its host plants. Acta Entomologica Sinica 40, 16.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, H.H., Maddison, D.R. & Tu, Z.J. (1998) The evolution of vitellogenins, cyclorrhaphan yolk proteins and related molecules. Advances in Insect Physiology 27, 335384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havukainen, H., Halskau, O. & Amdam, G.V. (2011) Social pleiotropy and the molecular evolution of honey bee vitellogenin. Molecular Ecology 20, 51115113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirai, M., Watanabe, D., Kiyota, A. & Chinzei, Y. (1998) Nucleotide sequence of vitellogenin mRNA in the bean bug, Riptortus clavatus: analysis of processing in the fat body and ovary. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 28, 537547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiremath, S. & Lehtoma, K. (1997) Complete nucleotide sequence of the vitellogenin mRNA from the Gypsy Moth . Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27, 27–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, D.S., Lee, W., Han, J., Park, H.G., Lee, J., Lee, Y.M. & Lee, J.S. (2010) Molecular characterization and expression of vitellogenin (Vg) genes from the cyclopoid copepod, Paracyclopina nana exposed to heavy metals. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C-toxicology & Pharmacology 151, 360368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, C. (2007) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. ISAAA Briefs No. 37. Ithaca, NY, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications.Google Scholar
Koywiwattrakul, P. & Sittipraneed, S. (2009) Expression of vitellogenin and transferrin in activated ovaries of worker honey bees, Apis mellifera . Biochemical Genetics 47, 1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, A.K., Sadasivam, M. & Ding, J.L. (2003) Receptor-ligand interaction between vitellogenin receptor (VtgR) and vitellogenin (Vtg), implications on low density lipoprotein receptor and apolipoprotein B/E-The first three ligand-binding repeats of VtgR interact with the amino-terminal region on Vtg. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 27992806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, G.M., Tan, W.J. & Guo, Y.Y. (2000) Study on screening and inheritance mode of resistance to Bt transgenic cotton in cotton bollworm. Acta Entomologica Sinica 43, 5762.Google Scholar
Liang, G.M., Wu, K.M., Rector, B. & Guo, Y.Y. (2007) Diapause, cold hardiness and flight ability of Cry1Ac-resistant and -susceptible strains of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). European Journal of Entomology 104, 699704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, G.M., Wu, K.M., Yu, H.K., Li, K.K., Feng, X. & Guo, Y.Y. (2008) Changes of inheritance mode and fitness in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) along with its resistance evolution to Cry1Ac toxin. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 97, 142149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C.X., Li, Y.H., Gao, Y.L., Ning, C.M. & Wu, K.M. (2010) Cotton bollworm resistance to Bt transgenic cotton: A case analysis. Science China Life Sciences 53, 934941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livak, K.J. & Schmittgen, T.D. (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data usingreal-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25, 402408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y.H., Wu, K.M., Jiang, Y.Y., Guo, Y.Y. & Desneux, N. (2012) Widespread adoption of Bt cotton and insecticide decrease promotes biocontrol services. Nature 487, 362365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luttrell, R.G., Fitt, G.P., Ramalho, F.S. & Sugonyaev, E.S. (1994) Cotton pest management: part I A worldwide perspective. Annual Review of Entomology 39, 517526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, A., Yasuda, K., Adachi, H., Sakurai, Y., Ishii, N. & Goto, S. (1999) Vitellogenin-6 is a major carbonylated protein in aged nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans . Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 264, 580583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateraki, L.E. & Stratakis, E. (2000) Synthesis and organization of vitellogenin and vitellin molecules from the land crab Potamon potamios . Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 125, 5361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piulachs, M.D., Guidugli, K.R., Barchuk, A.R., Cruz, J., Simões, Z.L.P. & Bellés, X. (2003) The vitellogenin of the honey bee, Apis mellifera: structural analysis of the cDNA and expression studies. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 33, 459465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provost-Javier, K.N., Chen, S. & Rasgon, J.L. (2010) Vitellogenin gene expression in autogenous Culex tarsalis . Insect Molecular Biology 19, 423429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raybould, A. (2012) Can science justify regulatory decisions about the cultivation of transgenic crops? Transgenic Research 21, 691698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, R.M., Robertson, J.L. & Savin, N.E. (1977) POLO: a new computer program for probit analysis. Review Entomology Socity Amercian 23, 209215.Google Scholar
Sappington, T.W. & Raikhel, A.S. (1998) Molecular characteristics of insect vitellogenins and vitellogenin receptors. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 28, 277300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shinoda, T., Miura, K., Taylor, D. & Chinzei, Y. (1996) Vitellogenin and vitellin in the bean bug, Riptortus clavatus (Hemiptera:Alydidae): purification, immunological identification, and induction by juvenile hormone. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 31, 395412.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, Y.H., Zhou, J.J., Tang, W.C., Lu, K.L., Zhou, Q. & Zhang, G.R. (2009) Molecular characterization and expression pattern of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) vitellogenin, and its response to lead stress. Journal of Insect Physiology 55, 608616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabashnik, B.E., Carriere, Y., Dennehy, T.J., Morin, S., Sisterson, M.S., Roush, R.T., Shelton, A.M. & Zhao, J.Z. (2003) Insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops: lessons from the laboratory and field. Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 10311038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabashnik, B.E., Dennehy, T.J. & Carriere, Y. (2005) Delayed resistance to transgenic cotton in pink bollworm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 1538915393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabashnik, B.E., Gassmann, A.J., Crowder, D.W. & Carriere, Y. (2008) Insect resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory. Nature Biotechnology 26, 199202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabashnik, B.E., Wu, K.M. & Wu, Y.D. (2012) Early detection of field-evolved resistance to Bt cotton in China: cotton bollworm and pink bollworm. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 110, 301306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, 27312739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Telfer, W.H. (2009) Egg formation in Lepidoptera. Journal of Insect Science 9, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 46734680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J.R. & Banaszak, L.J. (2002) Lipid-protein interactions in lipovitellin. Biochemistry 41, 93989409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tufail, M. &Takeda, M. (2008) Molecular characteristics of insect vitellogenins. Journal of Insect Physiology 54, 14471458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tufail, M. & Takeda, M. (2009) Insect vitellogenin/lipophorin receptors: molecular structures, role in oogenesis, and regulatory mechanisms. Journal of Insect Physiology 55, 87103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tufail, M., Lee, J.M., Hatakeyama, M., Oishi, K. & Takeda, M. (2000) Cloning of vitellogenin cDNA of the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana (Dictyoptera), and its structural and expression analyses. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 45, 3746.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tufail, M., Naeemullah, M., Elmogy, M., Sharma, P.N., Takeda, M. & Nakamura, C. (2010) Molecular cloning, transcriptional regulation, and differential expression profiling of vitellogenin in two wing-morphs of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stal (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Insect Molecular Biology 19, 787798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, K.M. & Guo, Y.Y. (2005) The evolution of cotton pest management practices in China. Annual Review of Entomology 50, 3152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, K.M., Guo, Y.Y. & Gao, S.S. (2002 a) Evaluation of the natural refuge function for Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) within Bacillus thuringiensis transgenic cotton growing areas in north China. Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 832837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, K.M., Guo, Y.Y., Lv, N., Greenplate, J.T. & Deaton, R. (2002 b) Resistance monitoring of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein in China. Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 826831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, K.M., Lu, Y.H., Feng, H.Q., Jiang, Y.Y. & Zhao, J.Z. (2008) Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in China in areas with Bt toxin-containing cotton. Science 321, 16761678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, G.Y., Dong, S.Z., Song, Q.S., Shi, M., Chen, X.X. & Hu, C. (2008) Molecular cloning and developmental expression of the vitellogenin gene in the endoparasitoid, Pteromalus puparum . Insect Molecular Biology 17, 227233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H.N., Wei, Y., Zhao, J., Jin, L., Yang, Y.H., Wu, S.W., Tabashnik, B.E. & Wu, Y.D. (2011) Early warning of cotton bollworm resistance associated with intensive planting of Bt cotton in China. PLOS ONE 6, e22874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H.N., Tian, W., Zhao, J., Jin, L., Yang, J., Liu, C.H., Yang, Y.H., Wu, S.W., Wu, K.M., Cui, J.J., Tabashnik, B.E. & Wu, Y.D. (2012) Diverse genetic basis of field-evolved resistance to Bt cotton in cotton bollworm from China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109, 1027510280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, X.C., Wu, K.M. & Guo, Y.Y. (2007) Comparisons of calling behaviour of different geographical populations of Helicoverpa armigera . Journal of Applied Entomology 131, 684689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, X.C., Wu, K.M., Liang, G.M. & Guo, Y.Y. (2008) Altered mating behaviour in a Cry1Ac-resistant strain of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 132, 360365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, L.Y., Li, Y.M., Zhang, Y., Wei, J.Z., Liang, G.M. & Guo, Y.Y. (2012) Stability of resistance to Cry1Ac and its effects on relative fitness in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 39(1), 7074.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Primers used for vitellogenin sequencing.

Figure 1

Table 2. Toxicity and resistance ratio against Cry1Ac in the four H. armigera groups.

Figure 2

Fig. 1. RT-PCR analysis of the sex specific expression of the Helicoverpa armigera Vg. ♀ is the female adult sample, ♂ is the male adult sample and M is the weight maker (2000 bp ladder), respectively.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Alignment of the Vg sequences in Lepidoptera. Alignment of the deducted amino acid sequences from HaVg (Helicoverpa armigera Vg, GenBank accession no. JX504706), SlVg (Spodoptera litura Vg, ABU68426), ApVg (Antheraea pernyi Vg, BAB16412), AyVg (Antheraea yamamai Vg, BAB32640), AsVg (Actias selene Vg, ADB94560), BmVg (Bombyx mandarina Vg, BAE47146), CmVg (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Vg, AEM75020), BmVgP (Bombyx mori Vg precursor, NP_001037309), LdVg (Lymantriadispar Vg, AAB03336), ScpVg (Samia cynthia pryeri Vg, BAD91196), ScrVg (Samia cynthia ricini Vg, BAB32641) and SjVg (Saturnia japonica Vg, BAD91195). The highly conserved regions are highlighted. The GICG motif, the RXRR cleavage site motif and the DGXR motif are indicated in the sequence. The polyserine tracts are labeled by the black frame.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. A molecular phylogenetic (neighbor-joining) tree based on the entire amino acid sequence of Vg for forty insects and five non-insect species.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Tissue expression levels of the HaVg mRNA detected by qRT-PCR. (a) Relative expression levels of the HaVg mRNA in different tissues. All of the expression levels of the HaVg mRNA in the tissues were compared with that in the fat body. (b) Relative expression levels of the HaVg mRNA in the female fat body at different stages of development. Take the expression level of the HaVg mRNA at 6 h after emergence as the control group, the levels in the other times were compared with that in the control group. The data represent the mean±SE for at least four repeats normalized relative to the double reference genes transcript level (β-actin and GAPDH). The differences are considered statistically significant at the P<0.05 level.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. The quantity real time PCR analysis of the HaVg mRNA expression levels in the whole body of the Helicoverpa armigera females at different developmental stages in the 96S, BtR, CK1 and CK2 strains, respectively. The RNA samples were extracted from the whole bodies of the pupa at different stages after eclosion. The data represents the mean±SE for at least four repeats with β-actin and GAPDH as the double reference normalized genes. A statistical comparison by the Student's t-test in pairs by strain is listed in Supplementary Table S2.

Supplementary material: File

Zhang Supplementary Material

Table S1 and Table S2

Download Zhang Supplementary Material(File)
File 56.3 KB