Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T13:00:34.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisionary notes on the New World genera of cercopid froghoppers (Homoptera: Cercopoidea). II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. G. Fennah
R. G. Fennah
Affiliation:
c/o Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, c/o British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many tomaspidine froghoppers are pests of crops in South America, and their current taxonomic position frequently does not reflect their true affinities. In this second revisionary contribution, certain generic features of Tiodus, Iphirhina, Tunaima and Urubaxia are described and compared, and 2 species are transferred to Maxantonia, 3 to Tunaima, 1 to Kanaima, 1 to Prosapia and 5 to Mahanarva. Huaina gen. n., Choconta gen. n. and Tiodus rufescens sp. n. are described. Monecphora fortunata Lall. is suppressed under Kanaima vittata (Wlk.), and Maxantonia scita (Wlk.) is recalled from synonymy with Monecphora quadrifasciata (Lep. & Serv.).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 267 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, C.. (1879). Hemiptera Argentina (Continuacion). —An. Soc. cient. argent. 8, 209–226.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L.. (1879). Descriptions of some new species of Hemiptera-Homoptera from Central America. —Entomologist's mon. Mag. 16, 61–63.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L.. (1909). Rhynchotal notes XLVL. —Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser. 8) 3, 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennah, R. G.. (1949). New genera and species of Neotropical Cercopidae (Homoptera). —Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser. 12) 1 (1948), 605–620.Google Scholar
Fennah, R. G.. (1968). Revisionary notes on the New World genera of cercopid froghoppers (Homoptera: Cercopoidea). —Bull. ent. Res. 58, 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, W. W.. (1897). Order Rhynchota. Suborder Hemiptera-Homoptera (Continued). —Biologia cent.-am. 2, 169–184.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1954 a). La candelilla en al arroz. —Bol. Ext. lnst. nac. Agric. Venez. [Maracay] no. 12, 1–19.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1954 b). Contribuciones al estudio de la candelilla (Aeneolamia spp. y Delassor spp., Homoptera Cercopidae) en Venezuela. I. Historia del insecto en el pais. —Agronomia trop. 4 no. 3, 151–161.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1955 a). Contribuciones al estudio de la candelilla de las gramineas en Venezuela. II. Los cercópidos causantes de la candelilla. (A) Aeneolamia (Tomaspis) varia (F.) y sus subespecies. —Agronomia trop. 5 no. 3, 135–194.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1955 b). Contribuciones al estudio de la candelilla de las gramineas en Venezuela. II. Los cercópidos causantes de la candelilla. (B) Aeneolamia flavilatera (Urich) y sus subespecies. —Agronomia trop. 6 no. 2, 51–73.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1957). Contributión al estudio de la candelilla en las gramineas de la Venezuela. III. Cuadro de la distributión geográphica de las especies de Aeneolamia Fennah y de sus plantas hospederas señaladas en Venezuela. —Agronomia trop. 6 no. 4, 165–194.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1961). Contribuciones al estudio de la candeliila de las gramineas en Venezuela. IV. Descriptión de una nueva subespecie de Aeneolamia flavilatera (Urich) que ataca a la cana de azucar. —Agronomia trop. 10 no. 4, 155–159.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1962). Las plagas de la cana de azucar en Venezuela. Tomo I–II.—Monografias Fondo. nac. Invest, agropec. no. 2 (tomo I: pp. ix, 1–482; tomo II: pp. [3] 483–850. Maracay, Centro de Investigaciones Agronomicas.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1970). As Cigarrhinas das pastagens do Nordeste do Brasil. —Ruralidade (Goiânia). 1 (2), 33–37.Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.. (1973). Homoptera Cercopidae, pp. 107–207in Pragas da Cana-de-Açúicar Nordeste do Brasil. — 622 pp. Rio, Ministério da Indústria do Comércio, Instituto do Acúcar e do Alcool, Divisão Administrativa, Serviço de Documentação (Coleçãao Canavieira. no. 10).Google Scholar
Guagliumi, P.., Tenório, E. C., Menezes, C.. ' Vilas Bôas, A. M.. (1972). Plantas hospedeiras das cigarrhinas. 88 pp. Publiçõacoes, Commissāo de combate à cigarrhina no Estado de Pernambuco. no. 5 [Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.]Google Scholar
Guérin-Méneville, F. E.. (1844). Insectes. Iconographie du règne animal de G. Cuvier 1829–1838. — 576 pp. Paris & London, J. B. Bailli`re.Google Scholar
Lallemand, V.. (1912). Homoptera Fam. Cercopidae. —Genera Insect. 143, 1–167.Google Scholar
Lallemand, V.. (1924 a). Notes sur les Cercopides de l'Amérique Centrale et Meridionale de la collection de M. C. B. Williams et de la mienne. —Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser. 9) 14, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lallemand, V.. (1924 b). Homoptéres nouveaux de la Collection du Muséum National de Paris et de la mienne. —Bull. Mus. natn. Hist, nat., Paris (1924). 378–385.Google Scholar
Lallemand, V.. (1927). Descriptions de Cercopides nouveaux provenant de la collection du British Muséum. —Trans. R. ent. Soc. Land. 75, 99–118.Google Scholar
Lallemand, V.. (1949). Révision des Cercopinae (Hemiptera Homoptera). Première partie. —Mém. lnst. r. Set. nat. Belg. (2) 32, 1–193.Google Scholar
Lallemand, V. & Synave, H.. (1952). Contribution à l'étude des Hemiptéres-Homoptères. I. — Note sur quelques Homoptères de L'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique. —Bull. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. 28 no. 7, 1–28.Google Scholar
Le Peletier de Saint-Fargeau, A. L. M.. & Audinet-Serville, J. G.. (1825). Tettigometre Tettigometra and Tettigone, Tettigonia, pp. 600–613in Latreille, M.. (Ed.). Olivier's Encyclopédie méthodique. Histoire naturelle. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des Crustacés, des Arachnides et des Insectes 10. — 832 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Nast, J.. (1950). Studia nad neotropikalnymi Cercopinae (Homoptera, Cercopoidea). Studies on Neotropical Cercopinae (Homoptera, Cercopidae). —Polskie Pismo ent. 20, 55–74.Google Scholar
Nast, J. (1975). Further studies on Neotropical Cercopidae (Homoptera). —Annls zool. Warsz 33, 93–101.Google Scholar
Say, T.. (1830). Descriptions of new North American Hemipterous insects belonging to the first family of the section Homoptera of Latreille (Continued). —J. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 6, 299–314.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E.. (1922). Beiträge zur Kenntniss aussereuropäischer Zikaden (Rhynchota, Homoptera) XXI. Maxantonia, eine neue Cercopiden-Gattung von Südamerica. —Arch. Naturgesch. 88, 264–265.Google Scholar
Stål, C.. (1862). Bidrag till Rio Janeiro-trakens Hemipterfauna. II.—K. svenska Vetensk-Akad. Handl. 3 (6), 1–75.Google Scholar
Walker, F.. (1851). List of the specimens of Homopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum, Part 3.—pp. 637–908. London, British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar