Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:59:28.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

No nutritional benefits of egg cannibalism for Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on a high-quality diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

A.H. Abdelwahab
Affiliation:
Economic Entomology Department, Mansoura University, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
J.P. Michaud*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Center-Hays, Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, 1232 240th Ave, Hays, KS 67601, USA
M.H. Bayoumy
Affiliation:
Economic Entomology Department, Mansoura University, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
S.S. Awadalla
Affiliation:
Economic Entomology Department, Mansoura University, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
M. El-Gendy
Affiliation:
Economic Entomology Department, Mansoura University, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
*
*Author for correspondence: Tel: 785-625-3425 Fax: 785-623-4369 E-mail: jpmi@ksu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Egg cannibalism serves various functions in the Coccinellidae. Here we examined the fitness consequences of egg cannibalism by neonates, fourth instar larvae, and prereproductive adults of Coleomegilla maculata DeGeer, with beetles fed a diet of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller eggs. Cannibalism of two eggs by neonates had no effect on development, and cannibalism of five eggs by fourth instars did not benefit any aspect of reproduction, but delayed pupation slightly. Cannibalism of eggs by pre-reproductive adults had no effect on reproductive success in any combination of reciprocal crosses of cannibals and non-cannibals. Females did not recognize, nor avoid consuming, their own clutches, and cannibalism propensity did not change following mating and onset of oviposition in either sex. These results contrast with those for more strictly aphidophagous species in which larvae gain developmental benefits, and females may recognize and avoid filial egg clusters while using cannibalism to interfere with conspecific females, whereas males reduce egg cannibalism after mating because they cannot recognize filial clusters. Egg cannibalism may confer developmental benefits to C. maculata when diet is suboptimal, as previously shown, but no such benefits were evident on the high-quality E. kuehniella egg diet. Female C. maculata do not require aphids to reproduce and distribute their eggs broadly in the environment, given that larvae can develop on pollen and non-aphid prey. Thus, C. maculata is not subject to the intraspecific competition that selects for cannibalism in more aphidophagous species, and also lacks many secondary adaptations associated with the behaviour.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

Cannibalism, the killing and eating of conspecifics, is now widely recognized as a behaviour that can enhance individual fitness under a variety of conditions. In general terms, cannibals often gain nutritional benefits over non-cannibals, advantages in intraspecific competition, or both (Fox, Reference Fox1975; Polis, Reference Polis1981). The nutritional benefits of cannibalism can range from subtle changes in developmental rate, to dramatic alterations in life history, to the difference between life and death when faced with starvation (Richardson et al., Reference Richardson, Mitchell, Reagel and Hanks2010). However, the indirect benefits of cannibalism conferred via reduced intraspecific competition can be more obscure and may be specific to a particular life stage, gender, or ecological context (Alabi et al., Reference Alabi, Michaud, Arnaud and Haubruge2008; Bayoumy & Michaud, Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015). A number of potential costs must be balanced against these benefits, including the risk of injury, disease (Rudolf & Antonovics, Reference Rudolf and Antonovics2007), or loss of inclusive fitness if a close relative is cannibalized (Joseph et al., Reference Joseph, Snyder and Moore1999).

Eggs are a life stage often targeted by cannibals (e.g., Richardson et al., Reference Richardson, Mitchell, Reagel and Hanks2010), as they are relatively defenceless and represent a store of conspecific protein and other nutrients in an undifferentiated and easily digestible form. In the extreme, infertile ‘trophic’ eggs are produced by some ant species as a way to store nutrients (Crespi, Reference Crespi, Elgar and Crespi1992). In other species, egg-clustering is a way that females can increase the probability of sibling egg cannibalism among their progeny when such behaviour improves net female fitness (Michaud & Grant, Reference Michaud and Grant2004; Barros-Bellanda & Zucoloto, Reference Barros-Bellanda and Zucoloto2005; Collie et al., Reference Collie, Kim and Baker2013). Many species of Coccinellidae, in particular, lay clustered eggs and derive various benefits from egg-cannibalism, whether they are predaceous (Osawa, Reference Osawa1992), or herbivorous (Nakamura & Ohgushi, Reference Nakamura and Ohgushi1981; Nakamura et al., Reference Nakamura, Hasan, Abbas, Godfray and Bonsall2004). Potential benefits include faster development, increased adult size, and fitness gained by reducing conspecific competition for progeny (Bayoumy & Michaud, Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015). Potential costs include the possibility of inadvertent filial cannibalism (Agarwala & Dixon, Reference Agarwala and Dixon1993).

Recently, Bayoumy & Michaud (Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015) assessed the life history consequences of egg cannibalism in three life stages of Hippodamia convergens Guerin-Meneville. Cannibalism by neonate larvae reduced their developmental time and resulted in heavier male adults. Cannibalism in the fourth instar accelerated pupation and the resulting adults laid eggs that hatched faster than those of non-cannibals, and had higher fertility if they were laid by cannibal mothers. Virgin male and female adults initially expressed similar cannibalism propensities, but egg cannibalism by females increased after mating, whereas it decreased in males. Female adults were able to distinguish and avoid cannibalizing clusters of their own eggs laid 24 h earlier. Because females did not gain any reproductive benefits from adult egg cannibalism, the function of increased egg cannibalism by mated females was inferred to be interference with the reproductive success of conspecific females. These patterns of cannibalism appeared to be consistent with the overall ecology of the species in its High Plains habitat, where adults scramble to reproduce quickly on ephemeral aphid outbreaks and may spend many months in reproductive diapause between generations (Michaud & Qureshi, Reference Michaud and Qureshi2006).

In contrast, the reproduction of Coleomegilla maculata De Geer, a North American species sympatric with H. convergens, is not so constrained by aphid availability. A highly polyphagous and facultatively omnivorous species (Hodek, Reference Hodek, Hodek and Honek1996), it can develop on an exclusive diet of pollen (Michaud & Grant, Reference Michaud and Grant2005) and even produce a few viable eggs without animal prey (Lundgren & Weidenmann, Reference Lundgren and Wiedenmann2004). Egg cannibalism by both larvae and adults of C. maculata has been well documented in field studies (Cottrell & Yeargan, Reference Cottrell and Yeargan1998a, Reference Cottrell and Yearganb; Schellhorn & Andow, Reference Schellhorn and Andow1999a, Reference Schellhorn and Andowb), but less is known about its fitness consequences for specific life stages. In the present work, we replicated with C. maculata the series of experiments conducted with H. convergens by Bayoumy & Michaud (Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015). We hypothesized that differences in ecology between the two species was reflected in different patterns of cannibalism behaviour. For example, the ability of H. convergens females to recognize their own egg clusters suggests that they have a high probability of re-encountering them in nature. This is consistent with ovipositional activity that is normally quite compressed in both time and space, dependent as they are on ephemeral and localized blooms of aphids. In contrast, C. maculata produce smaller clutches of eggs more continuously over a longer period (see Vargas et al., Reference Vargas, Michaud and Nechols2013 for a direct comparison), presumably distributing them far more widely across different habitats. Therefore, although we hypothesized that C. maculata would gain developmental benefits from neonate egg cannibalism similar to H. convergens, and possibly some reproductive benefits of cannibalizing in the fourth instar, we hypothesized that there would be little or no advantage for adult females to recognize filial versus non-filial egg clusters. Similarly, we hypothesized that there would be no change in cannibalism behaviour following a change in mating status for either male or female adults, as males would have low probability of encountering egg clusters they have sired, and females would gain little, if any, advantage from interfering with the reproductive success of conspecifics.

Materials and methods

Insect colony

A stock colony of C. maculata was established from ca. 160 adults collected from a corn field in Hays, KS, USA in May 2016. Adults were held in a 1 l glass mason jar filled with strips of wax paper to serve as harbourage and provisioned daily with eggs of the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) with water provided on a cotton wick. Jars were kept in a growth chamber set to 18 ± 1 °C, 55–65% RH and a 16:8 L:D photoperiod. Previous work has shown these conditions to be ideal for maintaining beetles in reproductive diapause for extended periods prior to breeding.

To produce beetles for experiments, 50 adult C. maculata females were isolated in plastic Petri dishes (5.5 cm diameter) and fed E. kuehniella eggs with water provided on a small piece of sponge, both refreshed daily. Females in reproductive diapause quickly mature eggs and begin oviposition upon isolation. Egg clusters were collected daily by transferring beetles to fresh dishes and the eggs were held in a climate-controlled growth chamber set to 26 ± 1.0 °C, 55–65% RH, and a 16:8 L:D daylength until eclosion. Neonate larvae were transferred to plastic Petri dishes (5.5 cm diam), five per dish, labelled according to their maternal lineage, and provisioned with frozen eggs of E. kuehniella plus water on a small cube of sponge, both refreshed every 2 days until larvae pupated. From experience, we knew that larvae of this species rarely cannibalize each other when good quality food is provided ad libitum. Upon emergence, adults were sexed, isolated in Petri dishes, and numbered according to their maternal lineage in order to prevent the pairing of siblings.

Neonate egg cannibalism

To assess the developmental consequences of neonate egg cannibalism in C. maculata, two groups of neonate larvae (n = 24 per treatment) were isolated in plastic Petri dishes (5.5 cm diam) within 24 h of eclosion. Larvae of the treatment group were each provided two conspecific eggs (24–48 h old) on their first day of life, while larvae of the control group were provided only E. kuehniella eggs with water on a small cube of sponge. Two eggs represent roughly twice the body weight of a neonate larvae, and previous work has shown that cannibalism of a single egg at this stage can be enough to alter larval life history (Osawa, Reference Osawa2002). Once all treatment larvae consumed their conspecific eggs (<6 h), they were provided ad libitum E. kuehniella eggs and water, both refreshed daily, and all larvae were reared until pupation on this diet without opportunity for any further egg cannibalism. All larvae were examined daily so that all developmental transitions could be tallied to the nearest day. Within 24 h of emergence, all adults were sexed and weighed on an analytical balance (Metler Toledo, model AG285, Columbus, Ohio).

Fourth instar egg cannibalism

To determine whether egg cannibalism later in larval development might benefit reproductive performance, a series of neonate larvae (n = 200) were obtained from the egg clusters of 15 unrelated females and isolated in plastic Petri dishes (5.5 cm diam). Larvae were labelled according to their maternal lineage and reared out on a diet of E. kuehniella eggs and water. Once larvae reached the fourth instar, they were divided into two groups with each maternal lineage equally represented in each. Larvae in the treatment group were each provided with five conspecific eggs (24–48 h old), in the presence of moth eggs and water, so that egg cannibalism was not driven by a lack of food in this experiment. Observations indicated that all conspecific eggs were consumed within 24 h. Both treatment (n = 100) and control larvae (n = 100) were then reared out on E. kuehniella eggs with water provided on a small cube of sponge, both refreshed daily. The duration of the fourth instar and pupal periods were recorded and, once larvae emerged as adults, they were separated by gender, isolated in clean Petri dishes, and provided E. kuehniella eggs and water. When beetles were 10–11 days old, non-sibling beetles were assigned to one of four mating treatments (n = 20 per treatment): ♀CAN × ♂CAN, ♀CAN × ♂NON, ♀NON × ♂CAN and ♀NON × ♂NON, where CAN and NON indicate cannibals and non-cannibals, respectively. Following termination of mating, females were isolated in Petri dishes (as above) and provided with E. kuehniella eggs and water, refreshed daily. Males were then isolated in separate Petri dishes (to prevent any egg cannibalism or disturbance of oviposition by females). The same pairs were reunited for a period of 4–5 h every other day to permit remating in the interest of maintaining female fertility. All eggs were collected daily by switching each female to a clean dish. Egg clusters were held until eclosion under the same conditions as the beetles, and the fecundity, fertility, and egg eclosion time of each female was recorded for 14 days after first oviposition.

Adult egg cannibalism

A series of 200 neonate larvae were obtained from the egg clusters of 15 unrelated females and isolated in plastic Petri dishes (as above) within 24 h of eclosion. Larvae were labelled according to their maternal lineage and reared out on a diet of E. kuehniella eggs and water. As adults emerged, a series were selected for the experiment that all emerged on the same day (n = 88). These were sorted by gender, isolated in Petri dishes, and divided into two groups of 44, each containing 22 males and 22 females. All adults were provisioned with moth eggs plus water, refreshed daily and, on their second day of adult life, both males and females in the treatment group were each provided with ten conspecific eggs (24–48 h old, all consumed within 24 h), which beetles in the control group did not receive. When beetles were 10–11 day-old (post-emergence), pairs of non-sibling beetles (n = 22 pairs per treatment) were established in Petri dishes in four different mating treatments (as in fourth instar egg cannibalism): ♀CAN × ♂CAN, ♀CAN × ♂NON, ♀NON × ♂CAN and ♀NON × ♂NON, where CAN and NON refer to cannibals and non-cannibals, respectively. Following termination of mating, females were again isolated in Petri dishes and supplied with eggs of E. kuehniella and water, refreshed daily. Females were each reunited with their male for 4–5 h every other day to maintain fertility. Fecundity and egg fertility data were collected for 14 days after first oviposition for each female.

Filial egg cannibalism by females

A series of 100 larvae were isolated in Petri dishes and reared out on E. kuehniella eggs and water, as described above. A series of emerging adults (n = 60) were then isolated in Petri dishes and fed the same diet. Once they were 10–11 days old post-emergence, these virgin beetles were paired in Petri dishes for about 6 h and directly observed to ensure all pairs successfully copulated. The females were then isolated in Petri dishes and provided with ad libitum E. kuehniella eggs and water, refreshed daily. Once females began laying eggs, circles were drawn around egg clusters on tops and bottoms of Petri dishes using different coloured markers to enable recognition of filial and non-filial eggs (colour designations were reversed in half the replicates to prevent any bias in the experiment). When eggs were still <24 h old, filial and non-filial egg clusters of approximately equal size (12–16 eggs) were combined in Petri dish arenas by bringing tops and bottoms together bearing one or the other – half of replicates had filial eggs on the top, the other half, on the bottom. Each female (n = 27) was introduced into an arena and, after 24 h, cannibalism of the marked clusters was tallied, along with any freshly laid eggs.

Cannibalism propensity and mating status

To test whether the propensity for adult egg cannibalism was sensitive to mating status, a series of 200 larvae from 15 maternal lineages were reared on eggs of E. kuehniella until they emerged as adults. Adults were isolated in 5.5 cm Petri dishes and fed E. kuehniella eggs and water. On day 10 post-emergence, adults of the treatment group were paired with a non-sibling of the opposite sex (n = 43 pairs), whereas those of the second group remained unmated in isolation (n = 43 females and 43 males). All beetles were tested on their 11th day of adult life by transferring them individually to 5.5 cm Petri dishes containing a cluster of conspecific eggs (n = 10) that were <48 h old. In replicates with females, these eggs were circled with a marker to distinguish them from any that might be laid during the course of the trial. Trials were conducted in the presence of ad libitum E. kuehniella eggs to prevent cannibalism from being driven by hunger alone.

Data analysis

Data sets were first tested for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and equality of variance (Levine's test); data sets that passed these tests were analyzed by ANOVA, and those that failed, by Mann–Whitney U-test, or Kruskal–Wallis H test when more than two groups were compared (SPSS, 1998). Data from the filial egg cannibalism experiment were analysed by means of a paired t-test using SPSS (1998). Whenever three or more means were compared by ANOVA, they were separated by the Bonferroni test (α = 0.05).

Results

Neonate egg cannibalism

Cannibalism of two eggs within 24 h of eclosion did not affect any aspect of C. maculata development. Data for total developmental time failed the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality (W = 0.775, P < 0.001) and were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U-test. Cannibal larvae averaged 17.6 ± 0.15 days in the larval stage, versus 17.8 ± 0.13 days for controls (U = 235.5, P = 0.235). Pupation time (the time from pupal moult to adult emergence) was almost constant at 4 days (one male in the cannibal treatment required 5 days). Data for adult weight also failed the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality (W = 0.944, P = 0.022) and were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U-test. Adult weight was also unaffected by cannibalism in both males (control: 12.1 ± 0.27 vs. cannibal: 11.9 ± 0.29 mg, U = 70.0, P = 0.479) and females (control: 13.2 ± 0.37 vs. cannibal: 14.2 ± 0.42 mg, U = 36.5, P = 0.116).

Fourth instar egg cannibalism

Cannibalism of five eggs within 24 h of moulting to the fourth instar caused a small increase in the duration of the fourth instar compared to controls (3.8 ± 0.05 vs. 3.5 ± 0.05 d; W = 0.689, P < 0.001; U = 3023.0, P < 0.001), but had no effect on pupal duration, which averaged 4.0 ± 0.2 d (W = 0.208, P < 0.001; U = 4414.5, P = 0.687). Neither the fresh weight of males (W = 0.988, P = 0.102; F 1,95 = 0.09, P = 0.772) nor females (W = 1.02, P = 0.157; F 1,90 = 0.83, P = 0.366) was significantly affected by egg cannibalism. The reproductive performance of reciprocal crosses did not differ in any respect among treatments (preoviposition period: W = 0.774, P < 0.001, H = 2.69, P = 0.442; 14-day fecundity: W = 0.759, P < 0.001, H = 3.52, P = 0.318; number of reproductive days: W = 0.820, P < 0.001, H = 3.10, P = 0.377; egg fertility: W = 0.757, P < 0.001, H = 1.91, P = 0.592; or time to eclosion: W = 0.787, P < 0.001, H = 1.68, P = 0.643; table 1).

Table 1. Mean (±SE) life history parameters for progeny of Coleomegilla maculata females from four mating treatments (CAN, cannibal; NON, control).

Cannibals each consumed five conspecific eggs (<24 h old) within 24 h of moulting to the fourth instar. All eggs were collected from each female for 14 days after first oviposition. No values were significantly different among treatments for any dependent variable (Kruskal–Wallis, α > 0.05).

Adult egg cannibalism

Cannibalism of ten eggs on the second day of adult life had no effect on the previposition period of females (W = 0.592, P < 0.001, H = 4.44, P = 0.218), their 14-day fecundity (W = 0.601, P < 0.001, H = 3.04, P = 0.386), number of reproductive days (W = 0.906, P < 0.001, H = 2.71, P = 0.438), egg fertility (W = 0.716, P < 0.001, H = 3.02, P = 0.389), or time to eclosion (W = 0.796, P < 0.001, H = 1.68, P = 0.642; table 2).

Table 2. Mean (±SE) life history parameters for Coleomegilla maculata females from four mating treatments (CAN, cannibal; NON, control).

Cannibals each consumed ten conspecific eggs (<24 h old) 24–48 h after emergence as an adult. All eggs were collected from each female for 14 days after first oviposition. No values were significantly different among treatments for any dependent variable (ANOVA, α > 0.05).

Filial egg cannibalism by females

Similar mean numbers of filial and conspecific eggs were offered to each of 27 females in the choice test (4.96 ± 0.36 vs. 4.96 ± 0.30 eggs; t = 0.00, P (2-tailed) = 1.000), and similar numbers were consumed (2.15 ± 0.45 vs. 2.96 ± 0.39; t = 1.55, P (2-tailed) = 0.133).

Cannibalism propensity and mating status

Adult males consumed similar numbers of eggs before (mean ± SE = 6.9 ± 0.6) and after (mean ± SE = 7.6 ± 0.5) mating (W = 0.280, P < 0.001; U = 845.0, P = 0.476), and so did females (8.1 ± 0.5 vs. 7.3 ± 0.6; W = 0.293, P < 0.001; U = 852.5, P = 0.473). Males cannibalized more eggs than females as virgins (U = 687.5, P = 0.028), but there were no gender differences after mating (U = 845.0, P = 0.457).

Discussion

Egg cannibalism by neonate larvae did not affect the developmental time of C. maculata, nor the duration of any immature life stage, compared with larvae that did not cannibalize. This result falsified our first hypothesis and stands in contrast to previous results for the same species (e.g., Gagne et al., Reference Gagne, Coderre and Mauffette2002) and those for most other lady beetle species that have been examined in this regard (Osawa, Reference Osawa1992, Reference Osawa2002; Michaud & Grant, Reference Michaud and Grant2004; Omkar et al., Reference Omkar and Gupta2006, Reference Omkar, Pervez and Gupta2007; Pervez et al., Reference Pervez, Gupta and Omkar2006; Roy et al., Reference Roy, Rudge, Goldrick and Hawkins2007; Bayoumy & Michaud, Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015). Whereas most of the latter studies employed aphids as the primary larval diet, the present study employed eggs of E. kuehniella and this may account for the absence of effects on developmental time. Apart from being a passive, rather than active prey, that require no energy to subdue, the moth eggs are also a richer source of protein and lipids than are aphids (Specty et al., Reference Specty, Febvay, Grenier, Delobel, Piotte, Pageaux, Ferran and Guillard2003) and have been shown to be superior to Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), a natural prey species, for C. maculata larval development (Michaud & Jyoti, Reference Michaud and Jyoti2008). Thus, the present results do not rule out potential developmental benefits of neonate egg cannibalism when the subsequent larval diet is inferior.

Michaud & Grant (Reference Michaud and Grant2004) studied the life history consequences of neonate egg cannibalism in three aphidophagous coccinellids and obtained similar results across species in some regards (faster development), but species-specific differences in others (larger body size in either male, female or both sexes). An E. kuehniella diet was also used in this study, and differences among species responses were attributed to differences among them in the relative suitability of the moth egg diet provided subsequent to cannibalism. Only males achieved larger body size in Cycloneda sanguinea (L), the species for which moth eggs were less suitable, whereas both sexes achieved larger body size in H. axyridis, for which E. kuehniella is close to an optimum diet. These results also conflicted with earlier results of Osawa (Reference Osawa2002) who found that male H. axyridis neonates benefited more than females from cannibalizing a single egg when the subsequent diet was Aphis spiraecola Patch, which happen to be an exceptionally low quality prey for most coccinellids (e.g., Michaud, Reference Michaud2000). Michaud & Grant (Reference Michaud and Grant2004) inferred that females are more sensitive to diet quality than males, and therefore only achieved the full benefits of neonate egg cannibalism when the subsequent diet quality was sufficiently high. The results for C. maculata contrast with these for more strictly aphidophagous species, because aphidophagy is a lifestyle that selects for cannibalism, and hence for physiological adaptations that benefit from it. If C. maculata rarely cannibalizes eggs in nature, it would not evolve the associated adaptations, and nutritional benefits of egg cannibalism would be evident only when it compensates for an otherwise low quality diet. Thus, the developmental benefits of neonate egg cannibalism observed by Gagne et al. (Reference Gagne, Coderre and Mauffette2002) most likely reflect the fact that A. pisum is inferior as a monotypic diet for C. maculata, whereas, an E. kuehniella diet is closer to optimal.

Egg cannibalism by C. maculata larvae in the fourth instar caused a small delay in completion of the fourth instar, but there were no effects on pupation time, adult weight, or subsequent reproductive performance. The delay in the onset of pupation probably reflects some displaced consumption of E. kuehniella eggs, which represent superior food for C. maculata larval development (Michaud & Jyoti, Reference Michaud and Jyoti2008). Once again, these results stand in contrast to those obtained for more strictly aphidophagous species. In a series of very similar experiments, H. convergens larvae that cannibalized a cluster of eggs in the fourth instar had reduced pupation times, and cannibal females had higher egg fertility than non-cannibals, whether they mated with cannibal or non-cannibal males (Bayoumy & Michaud, Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015). Because H. convergens females require aphids for egg production (Michaud & Qureshi, Reference Michaud and Qureshi2006), larvae of this species almost invariably develop within aphid colonies where predators will aggregate and opportunities for egg cannibalism by late instar larvae will occur. In contrast, it is probably rare for C. maculata larvae to encounter conspecific eggs after they leave their neonate cluster, given that they complete development on a wide range of foods, including pollen, in a variety of habitats (Hodek, Reference Hodek, Hodek and Honek1996; Lundgren & Weidennmann, Reference Lundgren and Wiedenmann2004; Michaud & Grant, Reference Michaud and Grant2005).

Egg cannibalism by prereproductive C. maculata adults resulted in no apparent costs or benefits to their subsequent reproductive success in any crossing treatment. In contrast, daughters produced by pairs of H. convergens cannibals matured to heavier body weights than did those in other treatments, albeit with a small cost in developmental time (Bayoumy & Michaud, Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015). In Coccinella undecimpunctata L., fecundity was improved by paternal cannibalism, whereas an improvement in fertility required cannibalism by both parents, and beneficial maternal effects of cannibal mothers were manifest in faster progeny development to larger body size with higher survival relative to non-cannibals (Bayoumy et al., Reference Bayoumy, Abou-Elnaga, Ghanim and Mashhoot2016). Although C. maculata females cannibalized somewhat more eggs than males when virgin, there were no significant gender differences after mating, and no significant change in cannibalism propensity of either sex as a function of mating status, supporting our hypothesis in this regard. Females were also unable to recognize and avoid cannibalizing their own egg clusters, as hypothesized, and again in contrast to H. convergens females (Bayoumy & Michaud, Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015). These results suggest that adult C. maculata adults rarely re-encounter their own egg masses in nature, as is more often the case for aphidophagous species that oviposit within aphid infestations that give rise to predator aggregations. Without dependency on aphids for reproduction, C. maculata is able to produce smaller egg clusters over a much longer period than H. convergens (Vargas et al., Reference Vargas, Michaud and Nechols2013) and likely distributes them far more widely in the environment. For example, female C. maculata have been shown to express significant oviposition preferences for particular plant species in the absence of any prey (Cottrell & Yeargan, Reference Cottrell and Yeargan1998a; Griffin & Yeargan, Reference Griffin and Yeargan2002a, Reference Griffin and Yearganb; Staley & Yeargan, Reference Staley and Yeargan2005). If C. maculata females rarely re-encounter their own egg masses in nature, there would be no need to evolve filial cluster recognition, as do the females of many aphid specialists (e.g., Agarwala & Dixon, Reference Agarwala and Dixon1993). Similarly, with their offspring dispersed widely in the environment, there would be no payoff for females to increase their egg cannibalism following onset of oviposition to reduce local competition for their progeny, nor for males to reduce their egg cannibalism to avoid eating filial clusters. Both of these behavioural changes are observed in H. convergens (Bayoumy & Michaud, Reference Bayoumy and Michaud2015).

In summary, because of the highly aggregated structure of aphid infestations, strict aphidophagy probably results in high levels of intraspecific competition among both larval and adult coccinellids. These conditions could select for cannibalism even if nutritional benefits of the behaviour are initially weak, because it reduces intraspecific competition. As cannibalism become an increasingly important determinant of individual fitness, other adaptations will be selected that minimize costs (e.g., filial egg recognition) and maximize benefits (e.g., more effective utilization of the nutrition so obtained in growth and reproduction). This ecological inference is further supported by the high propensities for cannibalism expressed by the larval stages of other primarily aphidophagous predators such as the Chrysopidae (Duelli, Reference Duelli1981; Noppe et al., Reference Noppe, Michaud and De Clerq2012) and Syrphidae (Branquart et al., Reference Branquart, Hemptinne, Bauffe and Benfekih1997; Belliure & Michaud, Reference Belliure and Michaud2001). We conclude that both larval and adult stages of C. maculata readily cannibalize eggs in the presence of suitable food, and probably gain nutritional advantages from doing so under conditions of low prey quality or availability. However, C. maculata does not appear to rely on egg cannibalism as an intraspecific interference tactic to the same extent as do more aphidophagous species, and thus displays fewer of the derived adaptations associated with egg cannibalism, whether behavioural or physiological.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Egyptian Cultural Affairs and Missions Sector, Ministry of Higher Education, Egypt for financial support for AHA, Mansoura University for academic support, and the Egyptian Cultural and Educational Bureau in Washington, D.C. for guidance. We thank Clint Bain for technical support in conducting the experiments. This is contribution no. 17-311-J of the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Agarwala, B.K. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1993) Kin recognition: egg and larval cannibalism in Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 90, 4550.Google Scholar
Alabi, T., Michaud, J.P., Arnaud, L. & Haubruge, E. (2008) A comparative study of cannibalism and predation in seven species of flour beetle. Ecological Entomology 33, 716726.Google Scholar
Barros-Bellanda, H.C.H. & Zucoloto, F.S. (2005) Egg cannibalism in Ascia monuste in the field; opportunistic, preferential and very frequent. Journal of Ethology 23, 133138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayoumy, M.H. & Michaud, J.P. (2015) Egg cannibalism and its life history consequences vary with life stage, sex, and reproductive status in Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 108, 16651674.Google Scholar
Bayoumy, M.H., Abou-Elnaga, A.M., Ghanim, A.A. & Mashhoot, G.A. (2016) Egg cannibalism potential benefits for adult reproductive performance and offspring fitness of Coccinella undecimpunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 26, 3542.Google Scholar
Belliure, B. & Michaud, J.P. (2001) Biology and behavior of Pseudodorus clavatus (Diptera: Syrphidae), an important predator of citrus aphids. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94, 9196.Google Scholar
Branquart, E., Hemptinne, J.-L., Bauffe, C. & Benfekih, L. (1997) Cannibalism in Episyrphus balteatus (Dipt.: Syrphidae). Entomophaga 42, 145152.Google Scholar
Collie, K., Kim, S.J. & Baker, M.B. (2013) Fitness consequences of sibling egg cannibalism by neonates of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Animal Behaviour 85, 329338.Google Scholar
Cottrell, T.E. & Yeargan, K.V. (1998 a) Influence of a native weed, Acalypha ostryaefolia (Euphorbiaceae), on Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) population density, predation, and cannibalism in sweet corn. Environmental Entomology 27, 13751385.Google Scholar
Cottrell, T.E. & Yeargan, K.V. (1998 b) Effect of pollen on Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) population density, predation and cannibalism in sweet corn. Environmental Entomology 27, 14021410.Google Scholar
Crespi, B.J. (1992) Canniblism and trophic eggs in subsocial and eusocial species. pp. 177213 in Elgar, M.A. & Crespi, B.J. (Eds), Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution among Diverse Taxa. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duelli, P. (1981) Is larval cannibalism in lacewings adaptive – (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Researches on Population Biology 23, 193209.Google Scholar
Fox, L.R. (1975) Cannibalism in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 6, 87106.Google Scholar
Gagne, I., Coderre, D. & Mauffette, Y. (2002) Egg cannibalism by Coleomegilla maculata lengi neonates: preference even in the presence of essential prey. Ecological Entomology 27, 285291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M.L. & Yeargan, K.V. (2002 a) Oviposition site selection by the spotted lady beetle Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae): choices among plant species. Environmental Entomology 31, 107111.Google Scholar
Griffin, M.L. & Yeargan, K.V. (2002 b) Factors potentially affecting oviposition site selection by the lady beetle Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environmental Entomology 31, 112119.Google Scholar
Hodek, I. (1996) Food relationships. pp. 143238 in Hodek, I. & Honek, A. (Eds) Ecology of Coccinellidae. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, S.B., Snyder, W.E. & Moore, A.J. (1999) Cannibalizing Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) larvae use endogenous cues to avoid eating relatives. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, 792797.Google Scholar
Lundgren, J.G. & Wiedenmann, R.N. (2004) Nutritional suitability of corn pollen for the predator Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 50, 567575.Google Scholar
Michaud, J.P. (2000) Development and reproduction of lady beetles (Coloeptera: Coccinellidae) on the citrus aphids Aphis spiraecola Patch and Toxoptera citricida (Kirkaldi) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Biological Control 18, 287297.Google Scholar
Michaud, J.P. & Grant, A.K. (2004) The adaptive significance of egg cannibalism in the Coccinellidae: Comparative evidence from three species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97, 710719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, J.P. & Grant, A.K. (2005) Suitability of pollen sources for development and reproduction of Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) under simulated drought conditions. Biological Control 32, 363370.Google Scholar
Michaud, J.P. & Jyoti, J.L. (2008) Dietary complementation across life stages in a polyphagous lady beetle, Coleomegilla maculata. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 126, 4045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, J.P. & Qureshi, J.A. (2006) Reproductive diapause in Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and its life history consequences. Biological Control 39, 193200.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K. & Ohgushi, T. (1981) Studies on the population dynamics of a thistle-feeding lady beetle, Henosepilachna pustulosa (Kono) in a cool temperate climax forest II. Life tables, key-factor analysis, and detection of regulatory mechanisms. Researches in Population Biology 23, 210231.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K., Hasan, N., Abbas, L., Godfray, H.C.J. & Bonsall, M.B. (2004) Generation cycles in Indonesian lady beetle populations may occur as a result of cannibalism. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 271, S501S504.Google Scholar
Noppe, C., Michaud, J.P. & De Clerq, P. (2012) Intraguild predation between lady beetles and lacewings: outcomes and consequences vary with focal prey and arena of interaction. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 105, 562571.Google Scholar
OmkarPervez, A. Pervez, A. & Gupta, A.K. (2006) Why do neonates of aphidophagous ladybird beetles preferentially consume conspecific eggs in presence of aphids? Biocontrol Science and Technology 16, 233243.Google Scholar
Omkar, , Pervez, A. & Gupta, A.K. (2007) Sibling cannibalism in aphidophagous ladybirds: its impact on sex-dependent development and body weight. Journal of Applied Entomology 131, 8184.Google Scholar
Osawa, N. (1992) Sibling cannibalism in the lady beetle Harmonia axyridis: fitness consequences for mother and offspring. Researches in Population Ecology 34, 4555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osawa, N. (2002) Sex-dependent effects of sibling cannibalism on life history traits of the ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76, 349360.Google Scholar
Pervez, A., Gupta, A.K. & Omkar, (2006) Larval cannibalism in aphidophagous ladybirds: influencing factors, benefits and costs. Biological Control 38, 307313.Google Scholar
Polis, G. (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12, 225251.Google Scholar
Richardson, M.L., Mitchell, R.F., Reagel, P.F. & Hanks, L.M. (2010) Causes and consequences of cannibalism in non-carnivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 55, 3953.Google Scholar
Roy, H.E., Rudge, H., Goldrick, L. & Hawkins, D. (2007) Eat or be eaten: prevalence and impact of egg cannibalism on two-spot ladybirds, Adalia bipunctata. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 126, 3338.Google Scholar
Rudolf, V.H.W. & Antonovics, J. (2007) Disease transmission by cannibalism: rare event or common occurrence? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 274, 12051210.Google Scholar
Schellhorn, N.A. & Andow, D.A. (1999 a) Cannibalism and interspecific predation: role of oviposition behavior. Ecological Applications 9, 418428.Google Scholar
Schellhorn, N.A. & Andow, D.A. (1999 b) Mortality of coccinellid (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) larvae and pupae when prey become scarce. Environmental Entomology 28, 10921100.Google Scholar
Specty, O., Febvay, G., Grenier, S., Delobel, B., Piotte, C., Pageaux, J.-F., Ferran, A. & Guillard, J. (2003) Nutritional plasticity of the predatory ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): comparison between natural and substitution prey. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 52, 8191.Google Scholar
SPSS Inc. (1998) SPSS 8.0 for Windows. Prentice Hall, NJ, SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
Staley, A.C. & Yeargan, K.V. (2005) Oviposition behavior of Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): diel periodicity and choice of host plants. Environmental Entomology 34, 440445.Google Scholar
Vargas, G.A., Michaud, J.P. & Nechols, J.R. (2013) Trajectories of reproductive effort in two aphidophagous lady beetles respond to variation in both income and capital. Environmental Entomology 42, 341353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Mean (±SE) life history parameters for progeny of Coleomegilla maculata females from four mating treatments (CAN, cannibal; NON, control).

Figure 1

Table 2. Mean (±SE) life history parameters for Coleomegilla maculata females from four mating treatments (CAN, cannibal; NON, control).