Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T06:43:36.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological activity of two new pyrrole derivatives against stored-product species: influence of temperature and relative humidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2016

M.C. Boukouvala
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos str., 11855 Athens, Attica, Greece Laboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta str., 14561 Kifissia, Attica, Greece Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, Panepistimioupolis, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
N.G. Kavallieratos*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos str., 11855 Athens, Attica, Greece Laboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta str., 14561 Kifissia, Attica, Greece
C.G. Athanassiou
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Phytokou str., Nea Ionia, 38446 Magnissia, Greece
L.P. Hadjiarapoglou
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, Panepistimioupolis, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +30-2105294569 E-mail: nick_kaval@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Members of the pyrrole group are likely to have interesting properties that merit additional investigation as insecticides at the post-harvest stages of agricultural commodities. In the present work, the insecticidal effect of two new pyrrole derivatives, ethyl 3-(benzylthio)-4,6-dioxo-5-phenyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-carboxylate (3i) and isopropyl 3-(benzylthio)-4,6-dioxo-5-phenyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-carboxylate (3k) were studied as stored-wheat protectants against two major stored-product insect species, the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jaquelin du Val adults and larvae and the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller larvae at different doses (0.1, 1 and 10 ppm), exposure intervals (7, 14 and 21 days), temperatures (20, 25 and 30°C) and relative humidity (55 and 75%) levels. For T. confusum adults, in the case of the pyrrole derivative 3i, mortality was low and it did not exceed 32.2% in wheat treated with 10 ppm 3i at 30°C and 55% relative humidity. Progeny production was very low (<1 individual/vial) in all combinations of 55% relative humidity, including control. In the case of the pyrrole derivative 3k, mortality reached 67.8% at 30°C and 55% relative humidity in wheat treated with 10 ppm after 21 days of exposure. Progeny production was low in all tested combinations (≤0.7 individuals/vial) of 55% relative humidity, including control. For T. confusum larvae, in the case of the pyrrole derivative 3i, at the highest dose, mortality was 82.2% at 25°C and 55% relative humidity whereas in the case of 3k it reached 77.8% at the same combination. In contrast, mortality at 75% relative humidity remained very low and did not exceed 13.3%. For E. kuehniella larvae, the highest mortalities, 44.4 and 63.3%, were observed in 10 ppm at 25°C and 55% relative humidity for both pyrrole derivatives. The compounds tested here have a certain insecticidal effect, but this effect is moderated by the exposure, the target species, the temperature and the relative humidity.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Introduction

Stored grain protection based on chemical control is common, which consists of two major categories of insecticides: fumigants and contact insecticides. Presently, the use of fumigants, and especially phosphine (PH3), is probably the major measure taken for insect control at the post-harvest stages of durable commodities, including grains and related amylaceous products (Chaudhry, Reference Chaudhry2000; Benhalima et al., Reference Benhalima, Chaudhry, Mills and Price2004; Corrêa et al., Reference Corrêa, Tomé, Braga, Martins, de Olivera and Guedes2014). However, after the withdrawal of methyl bromide (CH3Br), and also the development of resistance to phosphine in many parts of the world (Bell, Reference Bell2000; Fields & White, Reference Fields and White2002; Pimentel et al., Reference Pimentel, Faroni, Tótola and Guedes2007, Reference Pimentel, Faroni, Guedes, Sousa and Tótola2009, Reference Pimentel, Faroni, Corrêa and Guedes2012), research on contact insecticides, known as grain protectants has been enhanced (Daglish, Reference Daglish2008; Hertlein et al., Reference Hertlein, Thompson, Subramanyam and Athanassiou2011; Arthur, Reference Arthur2012). Grain protectants defined as insecticides that are applied directly on the grains, are expected to protect the commodities from insect infestations as long as they remain active (Arthur, Reference Arthur1996). There are several grain protectants which have already been registered for direct application in many types of grains; most of these are organophosporous compounds (OPs) and pyrethroids that act on insects’ nervous system (Arthur, Reference Arthur1999; Arthur & Campbell, Reference Arthur and Campbell2008; Kavallieratos et al., Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou and Arthur2015a ). Nevertheless, some neurotoxic compounds, especially OPs, may be no longer acceptable, due to the presence of toxic residues on the final product, and the consumers’ demand for residue-free food (Arthur, Reference Arthur1996, Reference Arthur1999; Athanassiou et al., Reference Athanassiou, Kavallieratos, Arthur and Throne2013). At the same time, some of the major stored-product insect species cannot be controlled with traditional grain protectants, due to resistance development, as a result of a continuous use of certain active ingredients. For example, Rumbos et al. (Reference Rumbos, Dutton and Athanassiou2013) reported that pirimiphos-methyl, which is one of the most commonly used grain protectants globally, could not control the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.). Moreover, natural pyrethrum was unable to control five species of stored product psocid species, i.e., Lepinotus reticulatus Enderlein, Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel, Liposcelis entomophila (Enderlein) and Liposcelis paeta Pearman (Athanassiou et al., Reference Athanassiou, Arthur and Throne2009). This fact constitutes essentially the evaluation of novel compounds that can be used successfully as alternatives to OPs and pyrethroids. In this context, one recently newly registered compound for grain protection is the bacterial insecticide spinosad, which is based on metabolites of the actinomycete Saccharopolyspora spinosa Mertz and Yao (Hertlein et al., Reference Hertlein, Thompson, Subramanyam and Athanassiou2011). However, despite the fact that spinosad was found very effective for the control of R. dominica, it was not effective for other species, such as the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Hertz), and the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Hertlein et al., Reference Hertlein, Thompson, Subramanyam and Athanassiou2011). Another member of the spinosyn group, spinetoram, has also been proven an efficacious grain protectant, although it is not registered yet for that purpose (Vassilakos & Athanassiou, Reference Vassilakos and Athanassiou2012a , Reference Vassilakos and Athanassiou b , Reference Vassilakos and Athanassiou2013; Athanassiou & Kavallieratos, Reference Athanassiou and Kavallieratos2014). One other registered alternative is the insect growth regulator (IGR) methoprene (methoprene containing the R and S isomers and s-methoprene containing the S isomer alone), which is non-neurotoxic, as it acts on insects’ metamorphosis (Arthur, Reference Arthur2004; Athanassiou et al., Reference Athanassiou, Arthur and Throne2010a , Reference Athanassiou, Arthur and Throne b ; Wijayaratne et al., Reference Wijayaratne, Fields and Arthur2012). Nevertheless, methoprene or s-methoprene is not effective for some major species, such as the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.), the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and the stored product Psocoptera L. bostrychophila, Liposcelis decolor (Pearman), L. entomophila, L. paeta and L. reticulatus (Nayak et al., Reference Nayak, Collins and Reid1998; Edwards & Short, Reference Edwards and Short1984; Daglish, Reference Daglish2008; Athanassiou et al., Reference Athanassiou, Arthur and Throne2010b , Reference Athanassiou, Arthur, Kavallieratos and Throne2011).

One of the recently evaluated insecticides for stored product insect control is chlorfenapyr which is a non-neurotoxic pyrrole that causes oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria, which disrupts the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and has low mammalian toxicity (Hunt, Reference Hunt1996; Tomlin, Reference Tomlin2000; McLeod et al., Reference McLeod, Diaz and Johnson2002). This pyrrole has been found very effective against the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) in maize at doses >0.1 ppm after 7 days of exposure (Kavallieratos et al., Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou, Hatzikonstantinou and Kavallieratou2011). However, so far it is registered in the USA only for structural application against urban pests (Athanassiou et al., Reference Athanassiou, Kavallieratos, Arthur and Throne2014). In this regard, members of the pyrrole group are likely to have some interesting properties that merit additional investigation as insecticides at the post-harvest stages of agricultural commodities. Recently, it was found that some new sulfanyl 5H-dihydro-pyrrole derivatives have some certain biological activities by exhibiting strong antioxidant activity (i.e., inhibition of lipid peroxidation and soybean lipoxygenase) (Georgiou et al., Reference Georgiou, Toutountzoglou, Muir, Hadjipavlou Litina and Elemes2012; Oikonomou et al., Reference Oikonomou, Georgiou, Katsamakas, Hadjipavlou Litina and Elemes2015). However, there are no published data regarding the efficacy of these compounds as insecticides so far. In the present work, we examined the insecticidal activity of two new pyrrole derivatives against two major stored-product insect species, T. confusum adults and larvae and the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller larvae at different temperatures and relative humidity levels.

Materials and methods

Insects

The insects used in the tests were reared at the Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, in continuous darkness. The cultures, initially collected from Greek storage facilities, have been kept at Agricultural University of Athens since 2014. T. confusum was reared in wheat flour including 5% brewer's yeast (w/w) at 27(±0.1)°C and 60(±0.2)% relative humidity. E. kuehniella was reared in wheat flour at 26(±0.1)°C and 60(±0.2)% relative humidity. Adults <2 weeks old of T. confusum and first instar-larvae of T. confusum or E. kuehniella were used in the tests. For the first instar, T. confusum and E. kuehniella eggs were collected from flour by using a sieve of 60 mesh (250 micron, W.S. Tyler, Mentor, OH, USA), then placed in incubators at 27°C and 60% relative humidity, or 26°C and 60% relative humidity respectively, and larvae were collected after hatching.

Commodity

Untreated, clean hard wheat, Triticum durum Desf. (var. Mexa), free of infestation, was used in the bioassays. The moisture content of the tested wheat was 11%, as determined by a Dickey–John moisture meter (mini GAC plus, Dickey-John Europe S.A.S., Colombes, France) at the beginning of the tests. Before the bioassays, the tested commodity was sieved to remove impurities and dockage.

Pyrrole derivatives

Two pyrrole derivatives, developed by the late Prof Dr Y. Elemes and his group (Oikonomou et al., Reference Oikonomou, Georgiou, Katsamakas, Hadjipavlou Litina and Elemes2015), the ethyl 3-(benzylthio)-4,6-dioxo-5-phenyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-carboxylate (3i) and the isopropyl 3-(benzylthio)-4,6-dioxo-5-phenyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-carboxylate (3k), were used for experimentation (fig. 1). These are pure substances and were used as powders in the tests. The codes 3i and 3k correspond to the ones given for the certain derivatives by Oikonomou et al. (Reference Oikonomou, Georgiou, Katsamakas, Hadjipavlou Litina and Elemes2015).

Fig. 1. Chemical structures of the pyrrole derivatives tested.

Bioassays

In cylindrical glass jars 1 kg lots of wheat were placed and treated with the pyrrole derivatives at three doses: 0.1 ppm (mg pyrrole derivate powder/kg wheat), 1 ppm and 10 ppm. The jars were shaken manually for 5 min to achieve the uniform distribution of the pyrrole derivatives particles in the entire wheat mass. An additional 1 kg of untreated wheat was served as control. From each lot, three samples, of 10 g each, were taken and placed in small cylindrical glass vials (7 cm diameter, 12 cm height) with a different scoop that was inside each jar. The quantity of 10 g was weighed with a Precisa XB3200D compact balance (Alpha Analytical Instruments, Gerakas, Greece). The closure of the vials had a 1.5 cm diameter hole in the middle, which was covered by gauze, to allow sufficient aeration inside the vial. Then, 10 adults or larvae of each insect species were separately placed inside each vial. The internal ‘necks’ of the vials were covered by Fluon (Northern Products Inc., Woonsocket, USA), to prevent insects from escaping. Subsequently, six series of bioassays of each compound were placed in controlled chambers under the following conditions: 20(±0.1)°C and 55(±0.2)% relative humidity, 25(±0.1)°C and 55(±0.2)% relative humidity, 30(±0.1)°C and 55(±0.2)% relative humidity, 20(±0.1)°C and 75(±0.2)% relative humidity, 25(±0.1)°C and 75(±0.2)% relative humidity, 30(±0.1)°C and 75(±0.2)% relative humidity for the duration of the experimental period. Mortality of the treated individuals was assessed after 7, 14 and 21 days of exposure. Dead adults were determined by prodding with a brush to detect movement under an Olympus stereomicroscope (Olympus SZX9, Bacacos S.A., Athens, Greece). The brush was carefully washed after the examination of each vial. All tests were repeated three times for each species (adults or larvae), by preparing new lots each time. After the 21 days mortality counts, all (alive or dead) parental individuals were discarded. In the case of vials that contained parental T. confusum adults, they were again put inside the incubators at the same conditions for an additional period of 60 days. They were then removed and the numbers of progeny were counted as noted above. Adult and immature progeny were recorded and progeny production was expressed as number of individuals/vial. However, the majority of the total number of progeny (>87%) consisted of adults. Since control mortality was very low (<3%), no correction was necessary for the mortality data.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed separately for each of the tested species or stage according to the repeated-measures model (Sall et al., Reference Sall, Lehman and Creighton2001). The repeated factor was exposure interval, while mortality was the response variable. Dose, pyrrole derivative, relative humidity and temperature were the main effects. The associated interactions of the main effects were incorporated in the analysis. Progeny production counts were subjected to four-way ANOVA, with dose, pyrrole derivative, relative humidity and temperature as main effects. The associated interactions of the main effects were incorporated in the analysis. Progeny production in the control vials (0 ppm) was also included in the analysis. All analyses were conducted using the JMP 11 software (SAS Institute, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Means were separated by the Tukey–Kramer honestly significant difference (HSD) test at 0.05 probability (Sokal & Rohlf, Reference Sokal and Rohlf1995).

Results

Mortality and progeny of T. confusum adults

Between and within exposure intervals, the main effects and the associated interactions are presented in table 1. In the case of the pyrrole derivative 3i, after 7 days of exposure, mortality was very low (<8%) in all tested combinations (table 2). Seven days later, mortality increased further in the combinations of 55% relative humidity, but it did not exceed 24.4%, whereas in combinations of 75% relative humidity, mortality remained in very low levels (<3.5%). Similar trends were noted after 21 days of exposure. Mortalities were higher at 55% relative humidity than those at 75% relative humidity. Yet, mortality was low and it did not exceed 32.2% in wheat treated with 10 ppm 3i at 30°C and 55% relative humidity. Regarding progeny production, main effects and the associated interactions are presented in table 3. Progeny production was very low (<1 individual/vial) in all combinations of 55% relative humidity, including control (table 4). No offspring emerged in 1 ppm at 20°C or 10 ppm at 20 and 25°C and 55% relative humidity. The increase of temperature significantly increased adult emergence in 0.1 ppm at 75% relative humidity. Significant differences of progeny production between control and treatments were noted only at 25°C and 75% relative humidity where at 10 ppm significantly fewer offsprings were emerged compared with 0 ppm.

Table 1. Repeated measures MANOVA parameters for main effects and associated interactions for mortality levels of T. confusum adults or larvae and E. kuehniella larvae between and within exposure intervals (error d.f. = 384 for all species).

*P ≤ 0.05.

**P ≤ 0.01.

Table 2. Mean mortality (%±SE) of T. confusum adults after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3i at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Within each column, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 3, 35. Within each row, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 2, 26, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at P = 0.05. Where no letters exist, no significant differences were recorded. Where dashes exist, no analysis was performed.

*P ≤ 0.05.

Table 3. ANOVA parameters for progeny production of T. confusum adults (total d.f. = 431).

**P ≤ 0.01.

Table 4. Progeny production of T. confusum (individuals/vial ± SE) in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3i at four doses (inclusive of 0 ppm) under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels 60 days after the removal of parental adults.

Within each column and relative humidity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 3, 35. Within each row and relative humidity, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 2, 26, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at P = 0.05). Where no letters exist, no significant differences were recorded.

*P ≤ 0.05.

**P ≤ 0.01.

In the case of the pyrrole derivative 3k, after 7 days of exposure, the highest mortality (18.9%) was observed in wheat treated with 10 ppm at 25°C and 55% relative humidity while at 25 and 75% relative humidity the mortality was 1.1% (table 5). At 75% relative humidity, mortalities were very low and they did not exceed 6.7%. No mortality was recorded at 20 and 25°C and 75% relative humidity at 0.1 and 1 ppm 3k. After 14 days of exposure, mortality was further increased. At 55% relative humidity, mortality ranged from 13.3 to 37.8% while at 75% relative humidity the mortality did not exceed 12.2%. Finally, after 21 days of exposure, mortality reached 67.8% at 30°C and 55% relative humidity in wheat treated with 10 ppm. The overall mortality was lower at 75% than that at 55% relative humidity and ranged from 2.2 to 25.6%. Progeny production was low in all tested combinations (<0.7 individuals/vial) (table 6). No offspring emerged in 1 or 10 ppm 3k at 20 and 25°C and 55% relative humidity and in 1 ppm 3k at 20°C or in 10 ppm 3k at 20 and 25°C and 75% relative humidity. The progeny production in all treatments was significantly lower compared with control at 25 and 30°C and 75% relative humidity.

Table 5. Mean mortality (% ±SE) of T. confusum adults after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3k at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Within each column, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 3, 35. Within each row, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 2, 26, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at P = 0.05). Where no letters exist, no significant differences were recorded.

*P ≤ 0.05.

**P ≤ 0.01.

Table 6. Progeny production of T. confusum (individuals/vial ± SE) in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3k at four doses (inclusive of 0 ppm) under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels 60 days after the removal of parental adults.

Within each column and relative humidity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 3, 35. Within each row and relative humidity, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 2, 26, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at P = 0.05. Where no letters exist, no significant differences were recorded.

*P ≤ 0.05.

**P ≤ 0.01.

Mortality of T. confusum larvae

Between and within exposure intervals, the main effects and the associated interactions are presented in table 1. In the case of the pyrrole derivative 3i, after 7 days of exposure, significantly more larvae died at 25°C than at 30°C and 55% relative humidity in wheat treated with 1 ppm but the mortality did not exceed 26.7% (table 7). Similar trend was also observed in 10 ppm but without significant differences. Still, mortality was low (<37%). At 75% relative humidity, mortality remained at very low levels (<12%) in 1 ppm 3i. However, in 10 ppm 3i it arose to 36.7% at 20°C which was significantly higher than that at 25 and 30°C. Similar trends were noted after 14 days of exposure, where mortality was significantly higher in 0.1 and 1 ppm at 25°C and 55% relative humidity, reaching 35.6 and 44.4% respectively, than at 30°C and 55% relative humidity. In 10 ppm, mortality was 60% at 25°C and 55% relative humidity. The overall mortality was lower at 75% relative humidity than at 55% relative humidity. After 21 days of exposure, mortality was further increased. At the highest dose it was 82.2 at 25°C and 55% relative humidity and significantly higher than that at the other two temperatures. Yet, mortality was lower at 75% than at 55% relative humidity and it did not exceed 55.6 at 20°C and 75% relative humidity in 10 ppm 3i.

Table 7. Mean mortality (%±SE) of T. confusum larvae after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3i at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Within each column, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 3, 35. Within each row, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 2, 26, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at P = 0.05). Where no letters exist, no significant differences were recorded.

*P ≤ 0.05.

**P ≤ 0.01.

In the case of 3k, after 7 days of exposure, mortality was low in 0.1 and 1 ppm at all temperatures and relative humidity levels and it did not exceed 26.7% (table 8). In 10 ppm, mortality was significantly higher at 25°C than that at 30°C and 55% relative humidity. After 14 days of exposure, mortality increased further and reached 67.8 and 52.2% at 55 and 75% relative humidity at 25°C in 10 ppm, respectively. After 21 days of exposure, mortality increased to 77.8% at 25°C and 55% relative humidity. At 75% relative humidity, mortality was lower than at 55% in all combinations tested and reached 65.6% at 25°C except in 1 ppm at 25 °C after 21 days of exposure.

Table 8. Mean mortality (%±SE) of T. confusum larvae after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3k at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Within each column, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 3, 35. Within each row, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 2, 26, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at P = 0.05. Where no letters exist, no significant differences were recorded.

*P ≤ 0.05.

**P ≤ 0.01.

Mortality of E. kuehniella larvae

Between and within exposure intervals, the main effects and the associated interactions are presented in table 1. In the case of the pyrrole derivative 3i, after 7 days of exposure, the highest mortality (20%) was observed in 10 ppm at 25°C and 55% relative humidity (table 9). The overall mortality at 75% relative humidity was very low and ranged from 1.1 to 5.6%. After 14 and 21 days of exposure, mortality reached 41.1 and 44.4%, respectively, in the same combination as at 7 days of exposure. In contrast, mortality at 75% relative humidity remained very low and did not exceed 11.1 and 13.3% after 14 and 21 days of exposure.

Table 9. Mean mortality (%±SE) of E. kuehniella larvae after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3i at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Within each column, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 3, 35. Within each row, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 2, 26, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at P = 0.05. Where no letters exist, no significant differences were recorded.

*P ≤ 0.05.

**P ≤ 0.01.

In the case of 3k, after 7 days of exposure in wheat treated with 0.1 or 1 ppm, mortality did not exceed 12.2% at 25°C and 55% relative humidity (table 10). Significantly higher mortality was recorded at 25°C (42.2%) than at 20 or 30°C in 10 ppm 3k. At 75% relative humidity, no significant differences among temperatures were noted in any dose. The maximum mortality (30%) was recorded in 10 ppm at 20°C and 75% relative humidity. After 14 and 21 days of exposure, mortality was further increased and reached 52.2 and 63.3% in 10 ppm 3k at 25°C and 55% relative humidity, respectively, as at 7 days of exposure. The overall mortality at 75% relative humidity was lower and it did exceed 45.6 and 50% in 10 ppm 3k at 20°C and 75% relative humidity at 14 and 21 days of exposure, respectively. As at 7 days of exposure, no significant differences were observed among temperatures in all doses either after 14 or 21 days of exposure.

Table 10. Mean mortality (%±SE) of E. kuehniella larvae after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3k at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Within each column, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 3, 35. Within each row, exposure and relative humidity, means followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different; d.f. = 2, 26, Tukey–Kramer (HSD) test at P = 0.05. Where no letters exist, no significant differences were recorded.

*P ≤ 0.05.

**P ≤ 0.01.

Discussion

The results of the present study show that the substances tested have a certain insecticidal effect, but this effect is moderated by the exposure interval, the target species, the temperature and the relative humidity prevailing. Generally, these compounds had low toxicity against T. confusum adults, which means that they are poor adulticides. Furthermore, in all combinations tested here, progeny production was very low. For IGRs, a group of insecticides that disorganize the normal development of insects, there is no or low adult mortality, but progeny production is suppressed through immature mortality (Cogburn, Reference Cogburn1988; Daglish et al., Reference Daglish, Erbacher and Eelkema1993; Kostyukovsky et al., Reference Kostyukovsky, Chen, Atsmi and Shaaya2000; Daglish & Wallbank, Reference Daglish and Wallbank2005; Daglish, Reference Daglish2008; Athanassiou et al., Reference Athanassiou, Arthur, Kavallieratos and Throne2011; Kavallieratos et al., Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou, Vayias and Tomanović2012b ). Just as, Kavallieratos et al. (Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou, Vayias and Tomanović2012b ) tested eight IGR formulations against P. truncatus and found that mortality of adults was low, but the progeny suppression was satisfactory (86.4–100%), indicating that the larvicidal or ovicidal effect was high. In the present study, we found that the pyrrole derivatives tested gave a noticeable level of larval mortality, at least in some of the combinations used. Although we did not take any quantitative data towards this direction, we observed that the survived larvae were able to develop normally, which means that there was no effect on molting. The suppression of the offspring production of T. confusum is related to the biology of this species since, as a secondary colonizer, it cannot develop easily on sound grains (Brewer & Ferrell, Reference Brewer and Ferrell1992), a fact that may explain the low progeny that was observed in the control sound kernels of wheat we used. Thus, the tested ingredients may not act as IGRs. For the pyrrole chlorfenapyr, Kavallieratos et al. (Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou, Hatzikonstantinou and Kavallieratou2011) found that, as an admixture with the grains, mortality of P. truncatus adults was 98.3% in maize treated with 1 ppm, after 14 days of exposure. Nevertheless, at the same conditions, mortality of T. confusum adults was 47.8%. In general, adults of T. confusum cannot be easily controlled with several insecticides, such as alpha-cypermethrin, deltamethrin, abamectin, spinosad, chlorfenapyr, diatomaceous earths (DEs), and spinetoram (Athanassiou et al., Reference Athanassiou, Kavallieratos, Vayias, Papagregoriou, Dimizas and Buchelos2004; Kavallieratos et al., Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou, Vayias, Mihail and Tomanović2009; Hertlein et al., Reference Hertlein, Thompson, Subramanyam and Athanassiou2011; Kavallieratos et al., Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou and Boukouvala2012a , Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou, Korunic and Mikeli b ; Athanassiou & Kavallieratos, Reference Athanassiou and Kavallieratos2014). For instance, spinosad can control T. confusum adults at doses that largely exceed the recommended dose (1 ppm) (Hertlein et al., Reference Hertlein, Thompson, Subramanyam and Athanassiou2011). However, the larvae of this species were very susceptible to spinosad, suggesting that adult control will eventually occur through increased larval mortality (Hertlein et al., Reference Hertlein, Thompson, Subramanyam and Athanassiou2011). In our case, T. confusum larval mortality reached 82.2 and 77.8% in wheat treated with 3i and 3k, respectively after 21 days of exposure, indicating that high immature control can contribute to the concomitant adult control. The same holds for E. kuehniella larvae, as morality was 63.3% after 21 days of exposure in wheat treated with 3k.

Temperature plays a key role in the efficacy of several insecticides that are applied as grain protectants. For DEs, Vayias & Athanassiou (Reference Vayias and Athanassiou2004) noted that efficacy against T. confusum larvae was increased with the increase of temperature. Similar observations were made by Badii et al. (Reference Badii, Adarkwash, Ulrichs and Obeng Ofori2013) for the pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) in DE-treated Kersting's groundnut (Macrotyloma geocarpum Harms) seeds. Moreover, for the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam Arthur et al. (Reference Arthur, Yue and Wide2004) reported that mortality of the saw-toothed grain, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.), R. dominica, the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and T. castaneum were higher at 32 than at 22°C. Similar results have also been reported for spinosad and spinetoram as grain protectants against P. truncatus in treated maize and R. dominica, S. oryzae and T. confusum in treated wheat (Athanassiou & Kavallieratos, Reference Athanassiou and Kavallieratos2014). The rationale for this increased effect is that, at elevated temperatures, insect major metabolic activities are increased, which means that insects are more vulnerable to the toxic agent (Athanassiou & Kavallieratos, Reference Athanassiou and Kavallieratos2014). Moreover, insects are usually more mobile at increased temperatures, which means that they are likely to have a greater contact with the treated substrate (Kavallieratos et al., Reference Kavallieratos, Athanassiou, Korunic and Mikeli2015b ). Nevertheless, temperature may not play a key role on all stored product insects. For larvae of the Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner), Jenson et al. (Reference Jenson, Arthur and Nechols2009) noted that temperature did not affect the insecticidal effect of s-methoprene as surface treatment. Moreover, Rumbos et al. (Reference Rumbos, Dutton and Athanassiou2013) found that in grains treated with the OP insecticide pirimiphos-methyl, mortality of R. dominica and T. confusum was not generally affected by temperature ranging between 25 and 30°C. In that study, the authors found that relative humidity was the factor that determined the effect of temperature, as in high relative humidity values, mortality was generally lower. This could be attributed to the fact that at high relative humidity, water loss and, as a result, stress, may occur more rapidly (Arthur, Reference Arthur2000; Badii et al., Reference Badii, Adarkwash, Ulrichs and Obeng Ofori2013). Our results stand in accordance with this observation, as high relative humidity moderated larval and adult mortality of T. confusum. However, a humid environment, apart from the effect on the insect per se, may have a certain effect on the insecticide, i.e., increased dissipation, or trigger certain interactions between the insects and the active ingredient, such as reduced contact. For DEs, Vayias & Athanassiou (Reference Vayias and Athanassiou2004) reported a decrease in efficacy against larvae of T. confusum with the increase of relative humidity, due to the fact that DE dust particles are partially ‘inactivated’ at elevated humidity/moisture conditions. Our results showed that both pyrrole derivatives performed better at 25°C than at 20 or 30°C at both relative humidity levels against both insect species. This finding is important given that E. kuehniella develops quicker from egg to adult at 25°C than at lower or upper temperatures (Jacob & Cox, Reference Jacob and Cox1977). Furthermore, the level of 25°C could be critical for the potential application of the tested compounds in terms of optimization of their efficacy against E. kueniella and T. confusum.

For the pyrrole chlorfenapyr, the data about stored-product insect larvae are disproportionally fewer in comparison with those for adults. Arthur & Fontenot (Reference Arthur and Fontenot2012) found that although mortality of the 4-week old larvae of T. castaneum was low on surfaces which contained wheat flour and were partially treated with chlorfenapyr, most of the surviving larvae died later as adults. Hence, it is likely that further mortality occurred at later periods. Chlorfenapyr is generally considered as a slow-acting insecticide (Arthur & Fontenot, Reference Arthur and Fontenot2012), which means that increased mortality may not occur during initial exposure, and that exposed insects may escape from the treated substrate and colonize untreated parts of the commodity or the facility (Daglish & Nayak, Reference Daglish and Nayak2010). The results of the present study show that larvae of T. confusum were affected more than adults of T. confusum, however, we did not estimate possible pupal or adult mortality after the larval observation period, an issue that merits more investigation.

Pyrroles are novel insecticides that can be used with success against many insect pests in crop protection, but also at the post-harvest and urban environment. Our study is the first attempt to assess the insecticidal value of novel pyrrole derivatives. The data presented here illustrate that, under certain conditions, some of these ingredients can be further evaluated as insecticides, under a wider range of scenarios (i.e., biotic and abiotic factors). In this regard, the mode of insecticidal action of these compounds should be determined and characterized, as this constitutes the key element in any further assessment.

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by the project 4100 of Research Committee of the University of Thessaly and the scholarship “Athanassios Sotiroudas” provided by the Hellenic Entomological Society.

References

Arthur, F.H. (1996) Grain protectants: current status and prospects for the future. Journal of Stored Products Research 32, 293302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, F.H. (1999) Effect of temperature on residual toxicity of cyfluthrin wettable powder. Journal of Economic Entomology 92, 695699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, F.H. (2000) Toxicity of diatomaceous earth to red flour beetles and confused flour beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): effects of temperature and relative humidity. Journal of Economic Entomology 93, 526532.Google Scholar
Arthur, F.H. (2004) Evaluation of methroprene alone and in combination with diatomaceous earth to control Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) on stored wheat. Journal of Stored Products Research 40, 485498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, F.H. (2012) Aerosols and contact insecticides as alternatives to methyl bromide in flour mills, food production facilities, and food warehouses. Journal of Pest Science 85, 323329.Google Scholar
Arthur, F.H. & Campbell, J.F. (2008) Distribution and efficacy of pyrethrin aerosol to control Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in food storage facilities. Journal of Stored Products Research 44, 5864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, F.H. & Fontenot, E.A. (2012) Food source provisioning and susceptibility of immature and adult Tribolium castaneum on concrete partially treated with chlorfenapyr (Phantom®). Journal of Pest Science 85, 277282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, F.H., Yue, B. & Wide, G.E. (2004) Susceptibility of stored-product beetles on wheat and maize treated with thiamethoxam: effects of concentration, exposure interval, and temperature. Journal of Stored Products Research 40, 527546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassiou, C.G. & Kavallieratos, N.G. (2014) Evaluation of spinetoram and spinosad for control of Prostephanus truncatus, Rhyzopertha dominica, Sitophilus oryzae and Tribolium confusum on stored grains under laboratory tests. Journal of Pest Science 87, 469483.Google Scholar
Athanassiou, C.G., Kavallieratos, N.G., Vayias, B.J., Papagregoriou, A.S., Dimizas, C.B. & Buchelos, C.Th. (2004) Residual toxicity of beta cyflurthrin, alpha cypermethrin and deltamethrin against Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on stored wheat. Applied Entomology and Zoology 39, 195202.Google Scholar
Athanassiou, C.G., Arthur, F.H. & Throne, J.E. (2009) Efficacy of grain protectants against four psocid species on maize, rice and wheat. Pest Management Science 65, 11401146.Google Scholar
Athanassiou, C.G., Arthur, F.H. & Throne, J.E. (2010 a) Efficacy of layer treatment with methoprene for control of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) on wheat, rice and maize. Pest Management Science 67, 380384.Google Scholar
Athanassiou, C.G., Arthur, F.H. & Throne, J.E. (2010 b) Efficacy of methoprene for control of five species of psosids (Psocoptera) on wheat, rice, and maize. Journal of Food Protection 73, 22442249.Google Scholar
Athanassiou, C.G., Arthur, F.H., Kavallieratos, N.G. & Throne, J.E. (2011) Efficacy of spinosad and methoprene, applied alone or in combination against six stored-product insect species. Journal of Pest Science 84, 6171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassiou, C.G., Kavallieratos, N.G., Arthur, F.H. & Throne, J.E. (2013) Efficacy of a combination of beta-cyfluthrin and imidacloprid and beta-cyfluthrin alone for control of stored product insects on concrete. Journal of Economic Entomology 106, 10641070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Athanassiou, C.G., Kavallieratos, N.G., Arthur, F.H. & Throne, J.E. (2014) Residual efficacy of chlorfenapyr for control of stored-product psocids (Psocoptera). Journal of Economic Entomology 10, 854859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badii, K.B., Adarkwash, C., Ulrichs, C. & Obeng Ofori, D. (2013) Efficacy of diatomaceous earth formulations against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Kersting's groundnut (Macrotyloma geocarpum Harms): influence of dosage rate and relative humidity. Journal of Pest Science 87, 285294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, C.H. (2000) Fumigation in the 21st century. Crop Protection 19, 563569.Google Scholar
Benhalima, H., Chaudhry, M.Q., Mills, K.A. & Price, N.R. (2004) Phosphine resistance in stored-product insects collected from various grain storage facilities in Morocco. Journal of Stored Products Research 40, 241249.Google Scholar
Brewer, M.J. & Ferrell, M.A. (1992) Stored Grain Insects of Wyoming, an Introduction. MP-22. Laramie, WY, Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, M.Q. (2000) Phoshine resistance: a growing threat to an ideal fumigant. Pesticide Outlook 11, 8891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogburn, R.R. (1988) Fenoxycarb as a long-term protectant for stored rough rice. Journal of Economic Entomology 81, 722726.Google Scholar
Corrêa, A.S., Tomé, H.V.V., Braga, L.S., Martins, G.F., de Olivera, L.O. & Guedes, R.N.C. (2014) Are mitochondrial lineages, mitochondrial lysis and respiration rate associated with phosphine susceptibility in the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais? Annals of Applied Biology 165, 137146.Google Scholar
Daglish, G.J. (2008) Impact of resistance on the efficacy of binary combinations of spinosad, chlorpyrifos-methyl and s-methoprene against five stored-grain beetles. Journal of Stored Products Research 44, 7176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daglish, G.J. & Nayak, M. (2010) Uneven application can influence the efficacy of s-methoprene against Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) in wheat. Journal of Stored Products Research 46, 250253.Google Scholar
Daglish, G.J. & Wallbank, B.E. (2005) Efficacy of diflubenzuron plus methoprene against Sitophilus oryzae and Rhyzopertha dominica in stored sorghum. Journal of Stored Products Research 41, 353360.Google Scholar
Daglish, G.J., Erbacher, J.M. & Eelkema, M. (1993) Efficacy of protectants against Callosobruchus phaseoli (Gyll.) and C. maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in mugbeans. Journal of Stored Products Research 29, 345349.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.P. & Short, J.E. (1984) Evaluation of three compounds with insect juvenile hormone activity as grain protectants against insecticide-susceptible and resistant strains of Sitophilus species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 20, 1115.Google Scholar
Fields, P.G. & White, N.D.G. (2002) Alternatives to methyl bromide treatments for stored-product and quarantine insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 331359.Google Scholar
Georgiou, D., Toutountzoglou, V., Muir, K.W., Hadjipavlou Litina, D. & Elemes, Y. (2012) Synthesis of sulfur containing dihydro-pyrrolo derivatives and their biological evaluation as antioxidants. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 20, 51035109.Google Scholar
Hertlein, M.B., Thompson, G.D., Subramanyam, Bh. & Athanassiou, C.G. (2011) Spinosad: a new natural product for stored grain protection. Journal of Stored Products Research 47, 131146.Google Scholar
Hunt, D.A. (1996) 2-Arylpyrroles: a new class of insecticide. Structure, activity, and mode of action. Pesticides Science 47, 201202.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, T.A. & Cox, P.D. (1977) The influence of temperature and humidity on the life-cycle of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 13, 107118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, E.A., Arthur, F.H. & Nechols, J.R. (2009) Efficacy of methoprene applied at different temperatures and rates on surface substrates to control eggs and fifth instars of Plodia interpunctella . Journal of Economic Entomology 102, 19922002.Google Scholar
Kavallieratos, N.G., Athanassiou, C.G., Vayias, Β.J., Mihail, S. & Tomanović, Ž. (2009) Insecticidal efficacy of abamectin against three stored product insect pests: influence of dose rate, temperature, commodity and exposure interval. Journal of Economic Entomology 102, 13521359.Google Scholar
Kavallieratos, N.G., Athanassiou, C.G., Hatzikonstantinou, A.N. & Kavallieratou, H.N. (2011) Abiotic and biotic factors affect efficacy of chlorfenapyr for control of stored-product insect pests. Journal of Food Protection 74, 12881299.Google Scholar
Kavallieratos, N.G., Athanassiou, C.G. & Boukouvala, M.C. (2012 a) Insecticidal effect of chlorantaniliprole against major stored-product insect pests in different grain commodities under laboratory tests. Pest Management Science 69, 11411154.Google Scholar
Kavallieratos, N.G., Athanassiou, C.G., Vayias, B.J. and Tomanović, Ž. (2012 b) Efficacy of insect growth regulators as grain protectants against two stored-product pests in wheat and maize. Journal of Food Protection 75, 942950.Google Scholar
Kavallieratos, N.G., Athanassiou, C.G. & Arthur, F.H. (2015 a) Efficacy of deltamethrin against stored-product beetles at short exposure intervals or on a partially treated rice mass. Journal of Economic Entomology 108, 14161421.Google Scholar
Kavallieratos, N.G., Athanassiou, C.G., Korunic, Z. & Mikeli, N.H. (2015 b) Evaluation of three novel diatomaceous earths against three stored-grain beetle species on wheat and maize. Crop Protection 75, 132138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostyukovsky, M., Chen, B., Atsmi, S. & Shaaya, E. (2000) Biological activity of two juvenoids and two ecdysteroids against three stored product insects. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 30, 891897.Google Scholar
McLeod, P., Diaz, F.J. & Johnson, D.T. (2002) Toxicity, persistence, and efficacy of spinosad, chlorfenapyr, and thiamethoxam on eggplant when applied against the eggplant flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 331335.Google Scholar
Nayak, M.K., Collins, P.J. & Reid, S.R. (1998) Efficacy of grain protectants and phosphine against Liposcelis bostrychophila, L. entomophila, and L. paeta (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). Journal of Economic Entomology 91, 12081212.Google Scholar
Oikonomou, K., Georgiou, D., Katsamakas, S., Hadjipavlou Litina, D. & Elemes, Y. (2015) Sulfanyl 5H-dihydropyrrole derivatives via 1,3-dipolar cycloassition, their further chemical manipulation and antioxidant activity. Arkivoc 16, 214231.Google Scholar
Pimentel, M.A.G., Faroni, L.R.D'A., Tótola, M.R. & Guedes, R.N.C. (2007) Phoshine resistance, respiration rate and fitness consequences in stored-product research. Pest Management Science 63, 876881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, M.A.G., Faroni, L.R.D'A., Guedes, R.N.C., Sousa, A.H. & Tótola, M.R. (2009) Phosphine resistance in Brazilian populations of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 45, 7174.Google Scholar
Pimentel, M.A.G., Faroni, L.R.A., Corrêa, A.S. & Guedes, R.N.C. (2012) Phoshine-induced walking response of the lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica). Pest Management Science 68, 13681373.Google Scholar
Rumbos, C.I., Dutton, A.C. & Athanassiou, C.G. (2013) Comparison of two pirimiphos-methyl formulations against major stored-product insect species. Journal of Stored Products Research 55, 106115.Google Scholar
Sall, J., Lehman, A. & Creighton, L. (2001) JMP Start Statistics. A Guide to Statistics and Data Analysis using JMP and JMP IN Software. Belmont, CA, Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry. 3rd edn. New York, W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
Tomlin, C.D.S. (2000) The Pesticide manual. London, BCPC Publications.Google Scholar
Vassilakos, T.N. & Athanassiou, C.G. (2012 a) Effect of short exposures to spinetoram against three stored-product beetle species. Journal of Economic Entomology 105, 10881094.Google Scholar
Vassilakos, T.N. & Athanassiou, C.G. (2012 b) Effect of uneven distribution of spinetoram-treated wheat and rice on mortality and progeny production of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val. Journal of Stored Products Research 50, 7380.Google Scholar
Vassilakos, T.N. & Athanassiou, C.G. (2013) Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the efficacy of spinetoram for the control of three stored product beetle species. Journal of Stored Products Research 55, 7377.Google Scholar
Vayias, B.J. & Athanassiou, C.G. (2004) Factors affecting efficacy of the diatomaceous earth formulation SilicoSec against adults and larvae of the confused beetle Tribolium confusum du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Crop Protection 23, 565573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijayaratne, L.K.W., Fields, P.G. & Arthur, F.H. (2012) Effect of methoprene on the progeny production of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Pest Management Science 68, 217224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Chemical structures of the pyrrole derivatives tested.

Figure 1

Table 1. Repeated measures MANOVA parameters for main effects and associated interactions for mortality levels of T. confusum adults or larvae and E. kuehniella larvae between and within exposure intervals (error d.f. = 384 for all species).

Figure 2

Table 2. Mean mortality (%±SE) of T. confusum adults after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3i at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Figure 3

Table 3. ANOVA parameters for progeny production of T. confusum adults (total d.f. = 431).

Figure 4

Table 4. Progeny production of T. confusum (individuals/vial ± SE) in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3i at four doses (inclusive of 0 ppm) under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels 60 days after the removal of parental adults.

Figure 5

Table 5. Mean mortality (% ±SE) of T. confusum adults after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3k at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Figure 6

Table 6. Progeny production of T. confusum (individuals/vial ± SE) in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3k at four doses (inclusive of 0 ppm) under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels 60 days after the removal of parental adults.

Figure 7

Table 7. Mean mortality (%±SE) of T. confusum larvae after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3i at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Figure 8

Table 8. Mean mortality (%±SE) of T. confusum larvae after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3k at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Figure 9

Table 9. Mean mortality (%±SE) of E. kuehniella larvae after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3i at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.

Figure 10

Table 10. Mean mortality (%±SE) of E. kuehniella larvae after 7, 14 and 21 days in wheat treated with the pyrrole derivative 3k at three doses under three temperatures and two relative humidity levels.