Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dlb68 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T05:03:23.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associations of evolutionary-concordance diet, Mediterranean diet and evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern scores with all-cause and cause-specific mortality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

En Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
Caroline Y. Um
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
Anna Prizment
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
DeAnn Lazovich
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Roberd M. Bostick*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
*
*Corresponding author: R. M. Bostick, fax +1 404 727 8737, email rmbosti@emory.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various individual diet and lifestyle factors are associated with mortality. Investigating these factors collectively may help clarify whether dietary and lifestyle patterns contribute to life expectancy. We investigated the association of previously described evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet pattern scores and a novel evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern score with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the prospective Iowa Women’s Health Study (1986–2012). We created the diet pattern scores from Willett FFQ responses, and the lifestyle pattern score from self-reported physical activity, BMI and smoking status, and assessed their associations with mortality, using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Of the 35 221 55- to 69-year-old cancer-free women at baseline, 18 687 died during follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI for all-cause, all CVD, and all-cancer mortality among participants in the highest relative to the lowest quintile of the evolutionary-concordance lifestyle score were, respectively, 0·52 (95 % CI 0·50, 0·55), 0·53 (95 % CI 0·49, 0·57) and 0·51 (95 % CI 0·46, 0·57). The corresponding findings for the Mediterranean diet score were HR 0·85 (95 % CI 0·82, 0·90), 0·83 (95 % CI 0·76, 0·90) and 0·93 (95 % CI 0·84, 1·03), and for the evolutionary-concordance diet score they were close to null and not statistically significant. The lowest estimated risk was among those in the highest joint quintile of the lifestyle score and either diet score (both Pinteraction <0·01). Our findings suggest that (1) a more Mediterranean-like diet pattern and (2) a more evolutionary-concordant lifestyle pattern, alone and in interaction with a more evolutionary-concordant or Mediterranean diet pattern, may be inversely associated with mortality.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Authors 2018 

Cancer and CVD are the two leading causes of death worldwide(1). Diet and lifestyle are associated with these and other diseases(Reference Behrens, Fischer and Kohler2Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5). Increased attention is being placed on dietary patterns rather than individual food components in epidemiological investigations of associations of diet with mortality(Reference McCullough6). Various diet patterns, which contain multiple constituents acting and interacting along the same and different pathways, have been inversely associated with chronic disease risk and mortality(Reference Jankovic, Geelen and Streppel7Reference Zazpe, Sanchez-Tainta and Toledo17), supporting further research into dietary patterns in chronic disease prevention(Reference Hu18). Physical activity, excess adiposity, smoking and other modifiable lifestyle factors have been associated with higher mortality(Reference Ding, Rogers and van der Ploeg3, Reference Gellert, Schottker and Brenner19Reference Nocon, Hiemann and Muller-Riemenschneider25). Lifestyle factors coexist and may interact, and underlying causes of death may be multi-causal(Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5), suggesting that investigating associations of various lifestyle factors, in combination, with mortality may help with developing public health recommendations(Reference Ding, Rogers and van der Ploeg3, Reference Loef and Walach4, Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26Reference Yun, Won and Kimm29). Recently, we developed a ‘Paleolithic diet’ pattern score and a modified Mediterranean diet pattern score and found both diet pattern scores to be strongly inversely associated with biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation(Reference Whalen, McCullough and Flanders30), colorectal adenoma(Reference Whalen, McCullough and Flanders31) and all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality(Reference Whalen, Judd and McCullough32).

The Paleolithic diet pattern was developed to address the increase in ‘diseases of civilisation’ (cancer, CVD, etc.) as being the possible consequence of evolutionary discordance between the general diets and lifestyles of Homo sapiens living in the range of environments of evolutionary adaptedness before the agricultural revolution and those during the modern era(Reference Konner and Eaton33). The Paleolithic diet pattern, which was estimated from anthropological studies of fossils and extant hunter–gatherer societies, is characterised as rich in a marked diversity of fruits and vegetables, lean meats, eggs and nuts; excluding grains, dairy products and refined fats and sugar; and very low in salt(Reference Eaton and Konner34). Furthermore, lifestyle patterns that are more ‘Paleolithic-like’ include high levels of physical activity, energy balances resulting in lean body masses, and no tobacco use(Reference Eaton and Konner34, Reference Eaton, Konner and Shostak35). Given the constraints in investigating Paleolithic diet and lifestyle patterns in the modern context (e.g. limited wild food intakes, food preparation methods, types of physical activity), herein we use the alternative terms evolutionary-concordance diet and lifestyle patterns rather than ‘Paleolithic’ (our re-termed evolutionary-concordance diet pattern score is identical to our previously reported Paleolithic diet score).

The Mediterranean diet has been consistently reported to be beneficial for health and longevity(Reference Trichopoulou36, Reference Garcia-Fernandez, Rico-Cabanas and Rosgaard37), and is characterised by high intakes of fruits, cereals, nuts, vegetables, legumes and olive oil; moderate intakes of fish and poultry; low intakes of eggs, dairy products, red and processed meats and sweets; and moderate consumption of alcohol with meals(Reference Willett, Sacks and Trichopoulou38, Reference Trichopoulou, Costacou and Bamia39). Prospective cohort studies and recent meta-analyses found adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern to be inversely associated with all-CVD and all-cause mortality(Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference McNaughton, Bates and Mishra9, Reference Mitrou, Kipnis and Thiebaut10, Reference Reedy, Krebs-Smith and Miller11, Reference Tognon, Lissner and Saebye13, Reference Tong, Wareham and Khaw15, Reference Zazpe, Sanchez-Tainta and Toledo17, Reference Dinu, Pagliai and Casini40) and inconsistently inversely associated with all-cancer mortality(Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Mitrou, Kipnis and Thiebaut10, Reference Reedy, Krebs-Smith and Miller11, Reference Tognon, Nilsson and Lissner14, Reference Vormund, Braun and Rohrmann16, Reference Dinu, Pagliai and Casini40). Thus, the Mediterranean diet pattern can serve as a reference for comparisons of associations of a more evolutionary-concordant diet with mortality.

We previously reported similar inverse associations of evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet pattern scores with all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality in a prospective cohort of white and black adults(Reference Whalen, Judd and McCullough32). However, there are no reported studies of an association of an evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern score, alone or combined with an evolutionary-concordance or a Mediterranean diet pattern score, with mortality. Therefore, we addressed this in the prospective Iowa Women’s Health Study (IWHS).

Methods

Study population and data collection

As described previously(Reference Folsom, Kaye and Prineas41), the IWHS, established in 1986, is a prospective cohort study of 41 836 55- to 69-year-old Iowa women. In addition to the original survey, follow-up surveys were mailed in 1987, 1989, 1992, 1997 and 2004. The University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study, and the Emory University IRB also approved the present analysis.

At baseline, detailed information on demographics, self-measured anthropometrics, lifestyle, medical and family history, diet and other factors was collected. Dietary intakes and vitamin and mineral supplement use were collected at baseline using a 127-item semi-quantitative Willett FFQ, for which the validity and reliability in the study population were previously reported(Reference Munger, Folsom and Kushi42). Total energy and nutrient intakes were calculated by adding energy and nutrients from all food sources using the dietary database developed by Willett et al. (Reference Willett, Sampson and Browne43). Physical activity was assessed via two questions regarding the frequency of partaking in moderate and vigorous physical activities(Reference Kushi, Fee and Folsom44) and categorised as low, medium and high (see Table 2 footnote §). Diet and physical activities were only comprehensively reassessed in 2004 when only 68·3 % of the participants remained alive (therefore, only baseline exposure information was used in the present analyses).

Deaths were identified through the State Health Registry of Iowa and the National Death Index for those who did not respond to the follow-up questionnaires or had emigrated from Iowa. Underlying cause of death was assigned and coded by state vital registries according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). CVD mortality was defined using ICD-9 codes 390–459 and ICD-10 codes I00–I99, and cancer mortality was defined using ICD-9 codes 140–239 and ICD-10 codes C00-D48. Follow-up time was calculated as the time from the date of completing the baseline questionnaire to the date of death, the last follow-up contact, or the end of follow-up (31 December 2012), whichever was first(Reference Klein and Moeschberger45).

Scores

The evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet pattern scores were constructed in a similar manner as described previously(Reference Whalen, McCullough and Flanders30Reference Whalen, Judd and McCullough32). Based on the distribution of all study participants’ baseline intakes, each participant was assigned a quintile rank (a corresponding score from 1 to 5) of intake for each food category. Higher scores were given for higher intakes of foods considered characteristic of the diet pattern, and lower scores were given for lower-to-no consumption of foods considered not characteristic of the diet pattern (Table 1). For the evolutionary-concordance diet score, two unique variables were created. The first, a fruit and vegetable diversity score, was created by summing the total number of different fruits and vegetables that participants reported consuming >1–3 servings/month. Second, since the Paleolithic diet had little dairy food but high amounts of Ca (from wild plant foods)(Reference Eaton and Konner34), to consider dietary Ca separately from dairy products, we used the residuals of a linear regression of total Ca intake on total dairy products consumption. A modified Mediterranean diet score, the alternative Mediterranean diet score, originally developed as an adaptation to FFQ in the USA(Reference Fung, McCullough and Newby46), was calculated according to previous literature(Reference Fung, McCullough and Newby46, Reference Reedy, Mitrou and Krebs-Smith47). However, instead of basing it on dichotomising the component dietary intake categories (high v. low, based on median intake) as is most common, we used quintiles of intakes to facilitate a more direct comparison of the two diet scores. The components of the dietary scores were not weighted because (1) in our previously reported studies of dietary scores, weighting made no difference(Reference Dash, Bostick and Goodman48Reference Cheng, Um and Prizment50) and (2) the components of Mediterranean diet scores traditionally are not weighted. The points for each of the food groups comprising diet scores were summed. Therefore, the final, possible score ranges were 14–70 for the fourteen-component evolutionary-concordance diet score and 9–45 for the nine-component Mediterranean diet score, with higher scores indicating higher concordance with a dietary pattern.

Table 1 Constituents and construction of evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet pattern scores in the prospective Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012*

* All constituents measured in servings/week unless otherwise indicated. Highest intake ‘best’: number of points assigned to each quintile = quintile rank (e.g. highest and lowest quintiles scored 5 and 1 points, respectively); lowest intake ‘best’: number of points assigned to each quintile = reverse quintile rank (e.g. highest and lowest quintiles scored 1 and 5 points, respectively). Other: alcohol intake 5–15 g/d scored 5 points, outside of the range scored 1 point.

Consumption of nitrate-processed meats and non-lean red meat combined.

The evolutionary-concordance diet pattern score had fourteen components; range of possible scores, 14–70.

§ Lean meats included skinless chicken or turkey and lean beef.

|| Baked goods included items such as cake, pie and other pastry-type foods.

Fruit and vegetable diversity calculated by summing the total number of different fruits and vegetables items in the FFQ the participants indicated that they ate more than 1–3 times per month.

** Intake of Ca independent of non-Ca components of dairy foods; calculated as residuals from the linear regression of total Ca intake (mg/d) on dairy-food intake.

†† The Mediterranean diet pattern score had nine components; range of possible scores, 9–45.

For our novel, weighted, evolutionary-concordance lifestyle score, we combined physical activity, BMI (weight (kg)/height (m)2) and smoking status (Table 2). First, because there were only three categories for each lifestyle variable (rather than five categories as for the dietary variables), to put the lifestyle variables on the same initial scale as the dietary variables, each component was assigned a preliminary score of 1, 3 or 5, for, respectively, low/medium/high physical activity, BMI ≥30/25–<30/<25 kg/m2 and current/former/never smoking. Then, because the individual lifestyle factors are more strongly associated with all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality than are the individual dietary factors, the preliminary scores were weighted by dividing the two ‘most exposed’ category scores by summary relative risks from meta-analyses of associations of physical activity(Reference Li, Gu and Jing21, Reference Lollgen, Bockenhoff and Knapp22, Reference Nocon, Hiemann and Muller-Riemenschneider25), BMI(Reference McGee23) and smoking status(Reference Gellert, Schottker and Brenner19, Reference Jones, Tellez-Plaza and Navas-Acien20, Reference Mons, Muezzinler and Gellert24) with all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality. The summary relative risk values from these meta-analyses that were used for weighting the lifestyle score components are shown in Table 2. The final three-component lifestyle scores for all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality could range from 2·26 to 15·81, 2·10 to 17·69 and 2·34 to 17·25, respectively, with higher scores indicating a more evolutionary-concordant lifestyle.

Table 2 Constituents and construction of the evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern score in the prospective Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012

* Weights based on summary relative risks from reported meta-analyses of observational epidemiological studies of associations of physical activity(Reference Li, Gu and Jing21, Reference Lollgen, Bockenhoff and Knapp22, Reference Nocon, Hiemann and Muller-Riemenschneider25), smoking status(Reference Gellert, Schottker and Brenner19, Reference Jones, Tellez-Plaza and Navas-Acien20, Reference Mons, Muezzinler and Gellert24) and BMI(Reference McGee23) with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality; the initial points in the two most evolutionary concordant categories of physical activity (hypothesised to be inversely associated with risk) and the two least evolutionary concordant categories of smoking and BMI (hypothesised to be directly associated with risk) were divided by these values to yield the weighted values to be summed for the lifestyle score (e.g. for high physical activity and all-cause mortality: 5/0·69 = 7·25; for current smoker: 1/1·80 = 0·56).

Least evolutionary concordant category.

Most evolutionary concordant category.

§ Physical activity level derived from two questions regarding the frequency of moderate and vigorous physical activity(Reference Trichopoulou, Costacou and Bamia39), and categorised as high (vigorous activity twice a week or moderate activity >4 times/week), medium (vigorous activity once a week plus moderate activity once a week or moderate activity 2–4 times/week) and low.

|| Categories are for obese, overweight and normal/underweight, respectively, according to the WHO guidelines.

Statistical analysis

For our analyses, we excluded participants with a history of cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) at baseline (n 3830) and those who left >10 % of the FFQ questions blank (n 2499) or had implausible total energy intakes (<2510 or >20920 kJ/d; n 286), leaving an analytic cohort of 35 221.

Participants’ characteristics, by score quintiles, were summarised and compared using the χ 2 test for categorical variables and ANOVA for continuous variables. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazards ratios (HR) and 95 % CI to estimate the associations of the various scores with cause-specific and all-cause mortality. The scores were analysed as continuous and categorical variables (quintiles) based on the distributions of all participants’ scores at baseline. The median value of each diet score quintile was used for conducting all trend tests. Correlations between scores were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients.

Based on previous literature and biological plausibility, the following variables were considered as potential confounders for the diet score models: age (years; continuous), smoking status (current, past, never smoker), education (<high school, high school, >high school), BMI (continuous), physical activity (low, medium, high), total energy intake (kJ/d; continuous), hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use (current, past, never), marital status (married, never married, widowed, divorced/separated) and chronic disease (yes/no). Participants with chronic disease were defined as those who had a self-reported history of diabetes, heart disease or cirrhosis. For the lifestyle score model, the evolutionary-concordance diet score was also considered as a covariate. Criteria for inclusion in the final models were biological plausibility and/or whether inclusion/exclusion of the variable from the model changed the adjusted HR for the primary exposure variable by ≥10 %. The covariates for the final adjusted models are noted in the footnotes of Tables 4 and 5.

To assess potential interaction of the two diet scores with the lifestyle score, we conducted joint/combined (cross-classification) analyses. In these analyses, the reference group was participants who were in the first quintile of both the lifestyle score and the diet score of interest.

To assess whether associations differed by categories of other risk factors not included in the scores, we conducted separate analyses within each category of age (≤/>median age of 61 years), education (≤high school/>high school), chronic disease (yes/no), total energy intake (≤/>median of 7186 kJ/d) and HRT use (current or past/never).

To assess the sensitivity of the associations with various considerations, we repeated the analyses with the following variations: (1) excluded participants who died within 1 or 2 years of follow-up, (2) used a lifestyle score composed of unweighted components and (3) used a Mediterranean diet score based on dichotomised components. Finally, we investigated whether removing and replacing each component of each score one at a time materially affected the observed associations.

All analyses were conducted using SAS statistical software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). All P values were two-sided. A P value ≤0·05 or a 95 % CI that excluded 1·0 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 18 687 participants who died during 310 762 person-years of follow-up over 26 years (interquartile range: 11·6–22·6 years), 7064 died of CVD and 4665 of cancer. The baseline characteristics of the study participants according to quintiles of the evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet scores and the evolutionary-concordance lifestyle score are presented in Table 3. Participants in the highest relative to the lowest quintile of each diet score were more likely to be educated, use HRT, be physically active, and have higher mean total Ca and dietary fibre intakes. Participants in the highest quintile of the evolutionary-concordance diet score had lower mean total energy, alcohol, protein and carbohydrate intakes and were more likely to have a chronic disease, while those in the highest quintile of the Mediterranean diet score had higher mean total energy, alcohol, protein, carbohydrate and total fat intakes. Exclusive of variables included in the evolutionary-concordance lifestyle score, participants in the highest quintiles of the score were more likely to be educated, less likely to have a chronic disease, and had higher mean total energy, total Ca, total fat, dietary fibre, protein and carbohydrate intake and lower alcohol intake.

Table 3 Selected characteristics of participants according to quintiles of the evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet and evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern scores at baseline in the Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012 (Mean values and standard deviations, or percentages)

HRT, hormone replacement therapy.

* Continuous variables presented as means and standard deviations, and categorical variables as percentage.

P values calculated using the χ 2 test for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA for continuous variables.

Physical activity level derived from two questions regarding the frequency of moderate and vigorous physical activity(Reference Kushi, Fee and Folsom44), and categorised as high (vigorous activity twice a week or moderate activity >4 times/week), medium (vigorous activity once a week plus moderate activity once a week or moderate activity 2–4 times/week) and low.

§ History of diabetes, heart disease or cirrhosis.

|| Total = diet+supplements.

The evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet scores ranged from 19 to 68 and 9 to 45, respectively. The correlation between the two diet scores was r 0·54 (P <0·01). The lifestyle score for all-cause mortality ranged from 2·34 to 17·25. The correlations between the lifestyle score and the evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet scores were r 0·17 and 0·19, respectively (both P <0·01).

Multivariable-adjusted associations of the scores with all-cause and cause-specific mortality are presented in Table 4. For each score, the findings for all-CVD and all-cancer mortality were similar to those for all-cause mortality, and the lifestyle score was more strongly inversely associated with mortality than was either diet pattern score. When the lifestyle score was treated as a continuous variable, each point increase was associated with statistically significant 7, 6 and 8 % lower risk of all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality, respectively; when the score was categorised as quintiles, the corresponding estimates for those in the highest relative to the lowest quintiles were for 48, 47 and 49 % lower risk, respectively (all point estimates and tests for trend were statistically significant). The evolutionary-concordance diet score, whether treated as a continuous or categorical variable, was minimally inversely, but not statistically significantly, associated with all-cancer and all-cause mortality. For those in the upper relative to the lowest quintile of the Mediterranean diet score, risk for all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality was estimated to be 15, 17 and 7 % lower, respectively (point estimates for all-cause and CVD mortality were statistically significant).

Table 4 Multivariable-adjusted associations of evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet and evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern scores with total and cause-specific mortality in the Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012 (Numbers, hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals)

HR, hazards ratio.

* For score construction, see text and Table 1. HR from Cox proportional hazards models; covariates included age (years; continuous), smoking status (current, past, never smoker), education (<high school, high school, >high school), BMI (weight (kg)/height (m)2; continuous), physical activity (low, medium, high), total energy intake (kJ/d; continuous), hormone replacement therapy use (current, past, never), marital status (married, never married, widowed, divorced/separated) and chronic disease (yes/no).

Includes smoking, physical activity and BMI; for score construction, see text. HR from Cox proportional hazards models; covariates included age (years; continuous), education (<high school, high school, >high school), total energy intake (kJ/d; continuous), hormone replacement therapy use (current, past, never), marital status (married, never married, widowed, divorced/separated), chronic disease (yes/no) and evolutionary-concordant diet score (quintiles).

For all-cancer mortality, family history of cancer in a first-degree relative (yes/no) was added to the Cox proportional hazards models.

As shown in Table 5, being in the highest quintile of the lifestyle score jointly with being in either the highest quintile of the evolutionary-concordance diet score or the highest quintile of the Mediterranean diet score was associated with modestly lower risk for all-cause mortality (HR 0·46 (95 % CI 0·42, 0·50) and HR 0·45 (95 % CI 0·41, 0·49), respectively) than was being in the highest quintile of only one of the scores (both P interaction <0·01).

Table 5 Multivariable-adjusted joint/combined associations* of the evolutionary-concordance lifestyle score, and evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet pattern scores with all-cause mortality in the Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012 (Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals)

Ref., reference.

* HR from Cox proportional hazards models; covariates included age (years; continuous), education (<high school, high school, >high school), total energy intake (kJ/d; continuous), hormone replacement therapy use (current, past, never), marital status (married, never married, widowed, divorced/separated) and chronic disease (yes/no).

P interaction <0·01; from lifestyle score × diet score interaction term in the Cox proportional hazards model.

There were no consistent, clear patterns of differences in associations of any of the scores with all-cause mortality according to age, education, total energy intake or HRT use (online Supplementary Table S1). However, whereas the association of the diet scores with all-cause mortality were null among those with a history of a chronic disease at baseline, there was a statistically significant trend for decreasing risk with an increasing score among those with no such history and for those in the upper relative to the lowest quintile of the evolutionary-concordance and the Mediterranean diet scores, the HR were 0·92 (95 % CI 0·87, 0·97) and 0·80 (95 % CI 0·76, 0·84) (P interaction <0·01 and P interaction = 0·05, respectively) (online Supplementary Table S1).

Removal of physical activity and BMI from the lifestyle score did not substantially change the association of the score with all-cause mortality (online Supplementary Table S2). However, removal of smoking status from the score attenuated the association: for those in the upper relative to the lowest quintile, the HR changed from 0·52 (95 % CI 0·50, 0·55) to 0·76 (95 % CI 0·72, 0·80). In addition, (1) exclusion of participants who died within 1 or 2 years of follow-up, (2) using an unweighted lifestyle score and (3) using a Mediterranean diet score based on dichotomised components did not materially alter the results (online Supplementary Tables S3–S5). In the sensitivity analyses, removal/replacement of each individual dietary score component one at a time did not materially change the results.

Discussion

Our findings suggest that (1) a more Mediterranean-like diet pattern and (2) a more evolutionary-concordant lifestyle pattern, alone and in interaction with a more evolutionary-concordant or Mediterranean-like diet pattern, may be inversely associated with all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality. Although our findings for a more evolutionary-concordant diet were close to the null, its association with all-cause mortality was more inverse and statistically significant among those without a history of a chronic disease at baseline, suggesting that the diet pattern may possibly more strongly influence preventing than ameliorating chronic diseases that lead to premature mortality.

More evolutionary-concordant and Mediterranean-like diet patterns and more evolutionary-concordant lifestyle patterns may reduce the risk of chronic diseases that lead to premature mortality by several plausible mechanisms. Both diet patterns include high intakes of fruits, vegetables and nuts, which are rich sources of a variety of nutrients that may reduce risk via modulating detoxification enzymes; stimulating the immune system; reducing platelet aggregation; modulating cholesterol synthesis and hormone metabolism; and reducing blood pressure and antioxidant, antibacterial and antiviral effects(Reference Lampe51, Reference Bao, Han and Hu52). Both diet patterns also include low intakes of red, processed and fatty meats, which are high in high-energy total and saturated fats, which contribute to a positive energy balance, oxidative stress, inflammation and mutagenic/mitogenic bile acids in the gut(Reference Santarelli, Pierre and Corpet53Reference McAfee, McSorley and Cuskelly55) and have been linked to hypercholesterolaemia, endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, hypertension, CVD, type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer(Reference McAfee, McSorley and Cuskelly55Reference Cross, Leitzmann and Gail58). Physical inactivity, obesity and smoking individually have been consistently reported in epidemiological studies and systematic reviews with meta-analyses to be associated with higher risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality(Reference Gellert, Schottker and Brenner19, Reference Jones, Tellez-Plaza and Navas-Acien20, Reference Li, Gu and Jing21Reference Nocon, Hiemann and Muller-Riemenschneider25). Being more physically active was found to reduce obesity and risk of falling and associated injuries and to improve glucose metabolism, bone health, independent living and physical well-being, all of which may help reduce mortality risk(Reference Warburton, Glendhill and Quinney59). Obesity increases insulin resistance, inflammation and oxidative stress and contributes to the risk of death from some cancers, CVD and all causes combined(Reference Barness, Opitz and Gilbert-Barness60-Reference Solomon and Manson62). Smoking delivers known toxicants and carcinogens, which cause DNA damage leading to mutations and thus to multiple types of cancer; cell damage – especially in small airways – leading to chronic airway diseases; and endothelial dysfunction, dyslipidaemia and platelet activation – leading to vascular occlusion, thereby contributing to premature death(Reference Doll63, Reference Tsiara, Elisaf and Mikhailidis64).

Several reported studies investigated the possible health benefits of following a more evolutionary-concordant diet pattern. In four small, uncontrolled trials, four short-term randomised trials and one 2-year randomised trial, participants on an evolutionary-concordance diet pattern intervention, either short-term or long-term, had reductions in weight and waist circumference(Reference Genoni, Lyons-Wall and Lo65Reference Otten, Stomby and Waling69); improved glucose control, lipid profiles and insulin sensitivity(Reference Lindeberg, Jonsson and Granfeldt66, Reference Mellberg, Sandberg and Ryberg67, Reference Otten, Stomby and Waling69Reference Masharani, Sherchan and Schloetter74); and decreases in blood pressure(Reference Osterdahl, Kocturk and Koochek68, Reference Boers, Muskiet and Berkelaar71Reference Jonsson, Granfeldt and Ahren73). An evolutionary-concordance diet pattern was inversely associated with inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers in a cross-sectional study (n 646)(Reference Whalen, McCullough and Flanders30); with incident, sporadic colorectal adenoma in a case–control study (n 2301)(Reference Whalen, McCullough and Flanders31); and with all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) prospective cohort study (n 21 423; 2513 deaths during follow-up)(Reference Whalen, Judd and McCullough32). In REGARDS, for participants in the highest relative to the lowest evolutionary-concordance (‘Paleolithic’) diet pattern score quintile, the HR for all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality were 0·77 (95 % CI 0·67, 0·89), 0·78 (95 % CI 0·61, 1·00) and 0·72 (95 % CI 0·55, 0·95), respectively; the associations did not substantially differ by sex. Our minimally inverse, non-statistically significant results may be explained by the relative homogeneity of the dietary exposures in the IWHS population. Examples of first and fifth quintile median intakes in the IWHS v. the REGARDS cohorts are total vegetables, 11·5 and 43 v. 6·5 and 52·6 servings/week; sugar-sweetened beverages, 0 and 4 v. 0 and 11·8 servings/week and alcohol, 0 and 12·1 v. 0 and 23·1 g/d (online Supplementary Table S6).

Our findings of inverse associations of a Mediterranean diet pattern with all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality are consistent with those reported in previous prospective studies. Of ten reported prospective cohort studies(Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8Reference Tognon, Nilsson and Lissner14, Reference Vormund, Braun and Rohrmann16, Reference Zazpe, Sanchez-Tainta and Toledo17, Reference Prinelli, Yannakoulia and Anastasiou28), all found inverse associations with all-cause mortality, of which nine were statistically significant(Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8Reference Tognon, Nilsson and Lissner14, Reference Zazpe, Sanchez-Tainta and Toledo17, Reference Prinelli, Yannakoulia and Anastasiou28); the estimated associations were generally stronger among men(Reference Mitrou, Kipnis and Thiebaut10, Reference Reedy, Krebs-Smith and Miller11, Reference Sotos-Prieto, Bhupathiraju and Mattei12, Reference Tognon, Nilsson and Lissner14, Reference Vormund, Braun and Rohrmann16). Of the eight reported prospective cohort studies(Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Mitrou, Kipnis and Thiebaut10Reference Vormund, Braun and Rohrmann16), all reported inverse associations with all-CVD mortality, of which seven were statistically significant(Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Mitrou, Kipnis and Thiebaut10Reference Tong, Wareham and Khaw15); five reported associations stratified by sex, of which two reported stronger, statistically significant, associations among women(Reference Reedy, Krebs-Smith and Miller11, Reference Tognon, Nilsson and Lissner14). Of the six reported prospective cohort studies of associations of Mediterranean diet pattern scores with all-cancer mortality(Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Mitrou, Kipnis and Thiebaut10, Reference Reedy, Krebs-Smith and Miller11, Reference Sotos-Prieto, Bhupathiraju and Mattei12, Reference Tognon, Nilsson and Lissner14, Reference Vormund, Braun and Rohrmann16), all reported inverse associations, of which three were statistically significant(Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Mitrou, Kipnis and Thiebaut10, Reference Reedy, Krebs-Smith and Miller11); five reported associations stratified by sex, of which one reported a stronger, statistically significant, association among women(Reference Reedy, Krebs-Smith and Miller11).

Eight prospective cohort studies reported associations of lifestyle scores (some studies considered diet as part of lifestyle) with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Common score components included alcohol, dietary behaviour (primarily framed as adherence to existing dietary recommendations; for example, Mediterranean diet, Danish Dietary Recommendations, Dietary Guidelines to Australians, etc.), physical activity, sedentary behaviour, smoking, BMI and waist circumference(Reference Ding, Rogers and van der Ploeg3Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26Reference Yun, Won and Kimm29). Although these studies created different lifestyle scores, their results are consistent with ours in relation to all-cause(Reference Ding, Rogers and van der Ploeg3Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26Reference Yun, Won and Kimm29), all-CVD(Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26) and all-cancer(Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26, Reference Yun, Won and Kimm29) mortality. Of eight studies that investigated associations of lifestyle scores with all-cause mortality, all reported statistically significant, inverse associations(Reference Ding, Rogers and van der Ploeg3Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26Reference Yun, Won and Kimm29). Of the three studies of all-CVD mortality, all reported inverse, statistically significant associations(Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26). Of the four studies of all-cancer mortality, all reported statistically significant inverse associations(Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26, Reference Yun, Won and Kimm29). Of the three studies that reported results by sex, all found stronger inverse associations with all-cause and all-CVD mortality but not with all-cancer mortality, among women(Reference Ding, Rogers and van der Ploeg3, Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Yun, Won and Kimm29).

In line with previous studies(Reference Ding, Rogers and van der Ploeg3Reference Petersen, Johnsen and Olsen5, Reference Knoops, de Groot and Kromhout8, Reference Ford, Bergmann and Boeing26Reference Yun, Won and Kimm29), our findings of statistically significant, albeit modest, estimated interactions between a more evolutionary-concordant or Mediterranean-like diet and the lifestyle score suggest that multiple lifestyle factors and diet may interact to influence mortality. Since the effects of adverse factors may accumulate throughout life, it is particularly essential for elderly people to adhere to healthy diets and lifestyles that minimise their risk of death(75).

Our study strengths include that this is the first study of associations of a weighted evolutionary-concordance lifestyle score with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, the long-term prospective study design and the large sample size and number of deaths. However, the study has certain limitations. The FFQ has known limitations (e.g. recall error, limited number of food items, complex task of estimating and calculating intake frequencies, etc.). There was also limited reassessment of diet and other key exposures during follow-up. Although we adjusted for many potential confounders, residual and unmeasured confounding cannot be ruled out. Our study population was limited to older, white Iowa women, limiting the generalisability of our findings. Furthermore, as noted above, there was more homogeneity of diet and other exposures in our study population than found in other cohorts. However, our findings are generally consistent with those of other investigators.

In conclusion, our findings, taken together with previous literature, suggest that (1) a more Mediterranean-like diet pattern and (2) a more evolutionary-concordant lifestyle pattern, alone and in interaction with a more evolutionary- or Mediterranean-concordant diet pattern, may be inversely associated with all-cause, all-CVD and all-cancer mortality. Also, our findings for a more evolutionary-concordant diet alone, considering (a) its statistically significant, albeit modest, estimated interaction with the lifestyle score, (b) that it was inversely associated with mortality among those without a history of a chronic disease at baseline (which may suggest possible stronger influence on preventing than on ameliorating chronic diseases that lead to premature mortality) and (c) previous findings that it was inversely associated with mortality in a population with more heterogeneous diets, suggest that a more evolutionary-concordant diet pattern may contribute to lower mortality risk. Given that this is the first study of an association of an evolutionary-concordance lifestyle score – alone or jointly with evolutionary concordance and Mediterranean diet pattern scores – with mortality, further study in other populations is indicated.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (grant R01 CA039742). The National Cancer Institute had no influence on the analysis and interpretation of the data, the decision to submit the manuscript for publication, or the writing of the manuscript.

The author’s responsibilities are as follows: E. C. and R. M. B. designed the research; A. P. and D. L. coordinated data collection and provided the dataset; E. C. and C. Y. U. analysed data; E. C. wrote the manuscript; C. Y. U., A. P. and D. L. provided comments on the manuscript; R. M. B. revised the manuscript, supervised the research and had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material/s referred to in this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114518003483

References

1. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators (2015) Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 385, 117171.Google Scholar
2. Behrens, G, Fischer, B, Kohler, S, et al. (2013) Healthy lifestyle behaviors and decreased risk of mortality in a large prospective study of U.S. women and men. Eur J Epidemiol 28, 361372.Google Scholar
3. Ding, D, Rogers, K, van der Ploeg, H, et al. (2015) Traditional and emerging lifestyle risk behaviors and all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older adults: evidence from a large population-based Australian cohort. PLoS Med 12, e1001917.Google Scholar
4. Loef, M & Walach, H (2012) The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 55, 163170.Google Scholar
5. Petersen, KE, Johnsen, NF, Olsen, A, et al. (2015) The combined impact of adherence to five lifestyle factors on all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality: a prospective cohort study among Danish men and women. Br J Nutr 113, 849858.Google Scholar
6. McCullough, ML (2014) Diet patterns and mortality: common threads and consistent results. J Nutr 144, 795796.Google Scholar
7. Jankovic, N, Geelen, A, Streppel, MT, et al. (2014) Adherence to a healthy diet according to the World Health Organization guidelines and all-cause mortality in elderly adults from Europe and the United States. Am J Epidemiol 180, 978988.Google Scholar
8. Knoops, KT, de Groot, LC, Kromhout, D, et al. (2004) Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly European men and women: the HALE project. JAMA 292, 14331439.Google Scholar
9. McNaughton, SA, Bates, CJ & Mishra, GD (2012) Diet quality is associated with all-cause mortality in adults aged 65 years and older. J Nutr 142, 320325.Google Scholar
10. Mitrou, PN, Kipnis, V, Thiebaut, AC, et al. (2007) Mediterranean dietary pattern and prediction of all-cause mortality in a US population: results from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Arch Intern Med 167, 24612468.Google Scholar
11. Reedy, J, Krebs-Smith, SM, Miller, PE, et al. (2014) Higher diet quality is associated with decreased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality among older adults. J Nutr 144, 881889.Google Scholar
12. Sotos-Prieto, M, Bhupathiraju, SN, Mattei, J, et al. (2017) Association of changes in diet quality with total and cause-specific mortality. N Engl J Med 377, 143153.Google Scholar
13. Tognon, G, Lissner, L, Saebye, D, et al. (2014) The Mediterranean diet in relation to mortality and CVD: a Danish cohort study. Br J Nutr 111, 151159.Google Scholar
14. Tognon, G, Nilsson, LM, Lissner, L, et al. (2012) The Mediterranean diet score and mortality are inversely associated in adults living in the subarctic region. J Nutr 142, 15471553.Google Scholar
15. Tong, TY, Wareham, NJ, Khaw, KT, et al. (2016) Prospective association of the Mediterranean diet with cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality and its population impact in a non-Mediterranean population: the EPIC-Norfolk study. BMC Med 14, 135.Google Scholar
16. Vormund, K, Braun, J, Rohrmann, S, et al. (2015) Mediterranean diet and mortality in Switzerland: an alpine paradox? Eur J Nutr 54, 139148.Google Scholar
17. Zazpe, I, Sanchez-Tainta, A, Toledo, E, et al. (2014) Dietary patterns and total mortality in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN project. J Acad Nutr Diet 114, 3747.Google Scholar
18. Hu, FB (2002) Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol 13, 39.Google Scholar
19. Gellert, C, Schottker, B & Brenner, H (2012) Smoking and all-cause mortality in older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 172, 837844.Google Scholar
20. Jones, MR, Tellez-Plaza, M & Navas-Acien, A (2013) Smoking, menthol cigarettes and all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and a meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 8, e77941.Google Scholar
21. Li, Y, Gu, M, Jing, F, et al. (2016) Association between physical activity and all cancer mortality: dose–response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer 138, 818832.Google Scholar
22. Lollgen, H, Bockenhoff, A & Knapp, G (2009) Physical activity and all-cause mortality: an updated meta-analysis with different intensity categories. Int J Sports Med 30, 213224.Google Scholar
23. McGee, DL, Diverse Populations Collaboration (2005) Body mass index and mortality: a meta-analysis based on person-level data from twenty-six observational studies. Ann Epidemiol 15, 8797.Google Scholar
24. Mons, U, Muezzinler, A, Gellert, C, et al. (2015) Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on cardiovascular events and mortality among older adults: meta-analysis of individual participant data from prospective cohort studies of the CHANCES consortium. BMJ 350, h1551.Google Scholar
25. Nocon, M, Hiemann, T, Muller-Riemenschneider, F, et al. (2008) Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 15, 239246.Google Scholar
26. Ford, ES, Bergmann, MM, Boeing, H, et al. (2012) Healthy lifestyle behaviors and all-cause mortality among adults in the United States. Prev Med 55, 2327.Google Scholar
27. Hulsegge, G, Looman, M, Smit, HA, et al. (2016) Lifestyle changes in young adulthood and middle age and risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the Doetinchem Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc 5, e002432.Google Scholar
28. Prinelli, F, Yannakoulia, M, Anastasiou, CA, et al. (2015) Mediterranean diet and other lifestyle factors in relation to 20-year all-cause mortality: a cohort study in an Italian population. Br J Nutr 113, 10031011.Google Scholar
29. Yun, JE, Won, S, Kimm, H, et al. (2012) Effects of a combined lifestyle score on 10-year mortality in Korean men and women: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 12, 673.Google Scholar
30. Whalen, KA, McCullough, ML, Flanders, WD, et al. (2016) Paleolithic and Mediterranean diet pattern scores are inversely associated with biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative balance in adults. J Nutr 146, 12171226.Google Scholar
31. Whalen, KA, McCullough, M, Flanders, WD, et al. (2014) Paleolithic and Mediterranean diet pattern scores and risk of incident, sporadic colorectal adenomas. Am J Epidemiol 180, 10881097.Google Scholar
32. Whalen, KA, Judd, S, McCullough, ML, et al. (2017) Paleolithic and Mediterranean diet pattern scores are inversely associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in adults. J Nutr 147, 612620.Google Scholar
33. Konner, M & Eaton, SB (2010) Paleolithic nutrition: twenty-five years later. Nutr Clin Pract 25, 594602.Google Scholar
34. Eaton, SB & Konner, M (1985) Paleolithic nutrition. A consideration of its nature and current implications. N Engl J Med 312, 283289.Google Scholar
35. Eaton, SB, Konner, M & Shostak, M (1988) Stone agers in the fast lane: chronic degenerative diseases in evolutionary perspective. Am J Med 84, 739749.Google Scholar
36. Trichopoulou, A (2004) Traditional Mediterranean diet and longevity in the elderly: a review. Public Health Nutr 7, 943947.Google Scholar
37. Garcia-Fernandez, E, Rico-Cabanas, L, Rosgaard, N, et al. (2014) Mediterranean diet and cardiodiabesity: a review. Nutrients 6, 34743500.Google Scholar
38. Willett, WC, Sacks, F, Trichopoulou, A, et al. (1995) Mediterranean diet pyramid: a cultural model for healthy eating. Am J Clin Nutr 61, 1402S1406S.Google Scholar
39. Trichopoulou, A, Costacou, T, Bamia, C, et al. (2003) Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med 348, 25992608.Google Scholar
40. Dinu, M, Pagliai, G, Casini, A, et al. (2018) Mediterranean diet and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. Eur J Clin Nutr 72, 3043.Google Scholar
41. Folsom, AR, Kaye, SA, Prineas, RJ, et al. (1990) Increased incidence of carcinoma of the breast associated with abdominal adiposity in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 131, 794803.Google Scholar
42. Munger, RG, Folsom, AR, Kushi, LH, et al. (1992) Dietary assessment of older Iowa women with a food frequency questionnaire: nutrient intake, reproducibility, and comparison with 24-hour dietary recall interviews. Am J Epidemiol 136, 192200.Google Scholar
43. Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Browne, ML, et al. (1988) The use of a self-administered questionnaire to assess diet four years in the past. Am J Epidemiol 127, 188199.Google Scholar
44. Kushi, LH, Fee, RM, Folsom, AR, et al. (1997) Physical activity and mortality in postmenopausal women. JAMA 277, 12871292.Google Scholar
45. Klein, JP & Moeschberger, ML (2005) Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
46. Fung, TT, McCullough, ML, Newby, PK, et al. (2005) Diet-quality scores and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 163173.Google Scholar
47. Reedy, J, Mitrou, PN, Krebs-Smith, SM, et al. (2008) Index-based dietary patterns and risk of colorectal cancer: the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 168, 3848.Google Scholar
48. Dash, C, Bostick, RM, Goodman, M, et al. (2015) Oxidative balance scores and risk of incident colorectal cancer in a US prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 181, 584594.Google Scholar
49. Dash, C, Goodman, M, Flanders, WD, et al. (2013) Using pathway-specific comprehensive exposure scores in epidemiology: application to oxidative balance in a pooled case–control study of incident, sporadic colorectal adenomas. Am J Epidemiol 178, 610624.Google Scholar
50. Cheng, E, Um, CY, Prizment, AE, et al. (2018) Evolutionary-concordance lifestyle and diet and Mediterranean diet pattern scores and risk of incident colorectal cancer in Iowa women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27, 11951202.Google Scholar
51. Lampe, JW (1999) Health effects of vegetables and fruit: assessing mechanisms of action in human experimental studies. Am J Clin Nutr 70, 475S490S.Google Scholar
52. Bao, Y, Han, J, Hu, FB, et al. (2013) Association of nut consumption with total and cause-specific mortality. N Engl J Med 369, 20012011.Google Scholar
53. Santarelli, RL, Pierre, F & Corpet, DE (2008) Processed meat and colorectal cancer: a review of epidemiologic and experimental evidence. Nutr Cancer 60, 131144.Google Scholar
54. Ward, MH, Cross, AJ, Divan, H, et al. (2007) Processed meat intake, CYP2A6 activity and risk of colorectal adenoma. Carcinogenesis 28, 12101216.Google Scholar
55. McAfee, AJ, McSorley, EM, Cuskelly, GJ, et al. (2010) Red meat consumption: an overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Sci 84, 113.Google Scholar
56. Micha, R, Wallace, SK & Mozaffarian, D (2010) Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 121, 22712283.Google Scholar
57. Koeth, RA, Wang, Z, Levison, BS, et al. (2013) Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med 19, 576585.Google Scholar
58. Cross, AJ, Leitzmann, MF, Gail, MH, et al. (2007) A prospective study of red and processed meat intake in relation to cancer risk. PLoS Med 4, e325.Google Scholar
59. Warburton, DE, Glendhill, N & Quinney, A (2001) The effects of changes in musculoskeletal fitness on health. Can J Appl Physiol 26, 161216.Google Scholar
60. Barness, LA, Opitz, JM & Gilbert-Barness, E (2007) Obesity: genetic, molecular, and environmental aspects. Am J Med Genet A 143A, 30163034.Google Scholar
61. BMIMC, Global, Di Angelantonio, E, Bhupathiraju, Sh N, et al. (2016) Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet 388, 776786.Google Scholar
62. Solomon, CG & Manson, JE (1997) Obesity and mortality: a review of the epidemiologic data. Am J Clin Nutr 66, 1044S1050S.Google Scholar
63. Doll, R (1999) Risk from tobacco and potentials for health gain. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 3, 9099.Google Scholar
64. Tsiara, S, Elisaf, M & Mikhailidis, DP (2003) Influence of smoking on predictors of vascular disease. Angiology 54, 507530.Google Scholar
65. Genoni, A, Lyons-Wall, P, Lo, J, et al. (2016) Cardiovascular, metabolic effects and dietary composition of ad-libitum Paleolithic v. Australian guide to healthy eating diets: a 4-week randomised trial. Nutrients 8, 314.Google Scholar
66. Lindeberg, S, Jonsson, T, Granfeldt, Y, et al. (2007) A Palaeolithic diet improves glucose tolerance more than a Mediterranean-like diet in individuals with ischaemic heart disease. Diabetologia 50, 17951807.Google Scholar
67. Mellberg, C, Sandberg, S, Ryberg, M, et al. (2014) Long-term effects of a Palaeolithic-type diet in obese postmenopausal women: a 2-year randomized trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 350357.Google Scholar
68. Osterdahl, M, Kocturk, T, Koochek, A, et al. (2008) Effects of a short-term intervention with a Paleolithic diet in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 682685.Google Scholar
69. Otten, J, Stomby, A, Waling, M, et al. (2017) Benefits of a Paleolithic diet with and without supervised exercise on fat mass, insulin sensitivity, and glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 33, e2828.Google Scholar
70. Bligh, HF, Godsland, IF, Frost, G, et al. (2015) Plant-rich mixed meals based on Palaeolithic diet principles have a dramatic impact on incretin, peptide YY and satiety response, but show little effect on glucose and insulin homeostasis: an acute-effects randomised study. Br J Nutr 113, 574584.Google Scholar
71. Boers, I, Muskiet, FA, Berkelaar, E, et al. (2014) Favourable effects of consuming a Palaeolithic-type diet on characteristics of the metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot-study. Lipids Health Dis 13, 160.Google Scholar
72. Frassetto, LA, Schloetter, M, Mietus-Synder, M, et al. (2009) Metabolic and physiologic improvements from consuming a Paleolithic, hunter–gatherer type diet. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 947955.Google Scholar
73. Jonsson, T, Granfeldt, Y, Ahren, B, et al. (2009) Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 8, 35.Google Scholar
74. Masharani, U, Sherchan, P, Schloetter, M, et al. (2015) Metabolic and physiologic effects from consuming a hunter–gatherer (Paleolithic)-type diet in type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 944948.Google Scholar
75. World Health Organization & World Health Organization/Tufts University Consultation on Nutritional Guidelines for the Elderly (2002) Keep Fit for Life: Meeting the Nutritional Needs of Older Persons. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Constituents and construction of evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet pattern scores in the prospective Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012*

Figure 1

Table 2 Constituents and construction of the evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern score in the prospective Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012

Figure 2

Table 3 Selected characteristics of participants according to quintiles of the evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet and evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern scores at baseline in the Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012 (Mean values and standard deviations, or percentages)

Figure 3

Table 4 Multivariable-adjusted associations of evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet and evolutionary-concordance lifestyle pattern scores with total and cause-specific mortality in the Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012 (Numbers, hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 4

Table 5 Multivariable-adjusted joint/combined associations* of the evolutionary-concordance lifestyle score, and evolutionary-concordance and Mediterranean diet pattern scores with all-cause mortality in the Iowa Women’s Health Study (n 35 221), 1986–2012 (Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals)

Supplementary material: File

Cheng et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S6

Download Cheng et al. supplementary material(File)
File 56.2 KB