Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T15:12:53.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POWER THERAPIES: EVIDENCE VS MIRACULOUS CLAIMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1999

Gerald M. Rosen ,
Jeffey M. Lohr ,
Richard J. McNally  and
James D. Herbert
Gerald M. Rosen
Affiliation:
University of Washington, U.S.A.
Jeffey M. Lohr
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas, U.S.A.
Richard J. McNally
Affiliation:
Harvard University, U.S.A.
James D. Herbert
Affiliation:
Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Poole, de Jongh and Spector ask for empirical research rather than emotive arguments when evaluating EMDR. When one applies this standard, Poole et al.’s remaining points are devoid of substance. EMDR, like other Power Therapies, is a “miracle” cure that has failed.

Keywords

EMDRPTSDplacebosham therapies
Type
Leading Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 9 - 12
Copyright
© 1999 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.