No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ECT and Minors: When More is Less
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2009
Extract
In a diverse therapeutic context, multiple interventions are available for use with disordered or dysfunctional minors. With this population, electroshock administration is always inappropriate.
- Type
- Controversial Issues
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1996
References
Baldwin, S. and Jones, Y. (1990). ECT, children and clinical psychologists: a shock to the system? Clinical Psychology Forum 25, 3–5.Google Scholar
Baldwin, S. and Jones, Y. (1991). More ECT, more children and more clinical psychologists: new shocks to the system. Clinical Psychology Forum 32, 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, S. and Oxlad, M. (1996a). Multiple case sampling of ECT administration to 217 minors, a meta-analysis. Journal of Mental Health. In press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, S. and Oxlad, M. (1996b). ECT and minors: social sciences solutions will reform the psychiatric abuse of infants, children and adolescents. Journal of Mental Health 2(3), 174–188.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1994). ECT: sham statistics, the myth of convulsive therapy, and the case for consumer misinformation. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 15(1/2), 177–198.Google Scholar
James, A. C (1996). The use of ECT in adolescents: a reply to Jones and Baldwin. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 24, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. (1996). ECT and young minds: Why choose it? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 24, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxlad, M. and Baldwin, S. (1995). Electroconvulsive therapy, children and adolescents: the power to stop. Nursing Ethics 2(4), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.