Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T15:58:03.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT’S DUE: GUIDELINES ON AUTHORSHIP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

F. Katharina Reichelt ,
Ian A James  and
Derek L. Milne
F. Katharina Reichelt
Affiliation:
Newcastle City Health NHS Trust, U.K.
Ian A James
Affiliation:
Newcastle City Health NHS Trust, U.K.
Derek L. Milne
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The thorny issue of inappropriate authorship is a well recognized problem in research (Epstein, 1993). Recent editorials and articles in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Lancet and Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) have raised its profile amongst our medical colleagues. The current authors feel that clinical psychologists, nurses and other mental health professionals need to be more aware of the complexities of the area. Hence this paper intends to clarify the major concerns regarding proper accreditation and gives some recommendations and guidelines.

Keywords

Authorshippublicationsreferencingresponsibilityaccreditationcitation
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , November 1998 , pp. 339 - 344
Copyright
1998 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.