Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T15:16:41.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Contents May Vary”: A Pilot Study of Treatment Histories of OCD Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2007

Blake Stobie
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Tracey Taylor
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Alexandra Quigley
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Sandra Ewing
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Paul M. Salkovskis
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Definitions of treatment failure and the labelling of patients as non-responsive typically require treatments to have been offered and failed. For pharmacological treatments, treatment quality is relatively easy to define; this is much more difficult with psychological treatments. This study examined patient recollections of previous therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). A Treatment History Questionnaire was administered to a sample of 57 apparently treatment refractory OCD patients from a specialist national OCD treatment unit and a national charity for OCD sufferers. On average, respondents reported an 8$\frac{1}{2}$ year wait between the obsessional symptoms interfering significantly with their lives and being diagnosed. Forty-three percent recalled having received either cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) or behaviour therapy as the first treatment; 31% of the group did not know what type of therapy they had received. The components of therapy that respondents recalled were analysed and contrasted with minimal therapy criteria. These criteria appear not to have been met in most patients who understood that they had received “CBT”. The implications of this study for assessment of treatment integrity and the classification of patients as “treatment resistant” are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.