Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T15:04:42.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASSESSING THE INTEGRITY OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING INTERVENTIONS: RELIABILITY OF THE MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING SKILLS CODE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2003

Theresa Moyers ,
Tim Martin ,
Delwyn Catley ,
Kari Jo Harris  and
Jasjit S. Ahluwalia
Theresa Moyers
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
Tim Martin
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
Delwyn Catley
Affiliation:
University of Kansas Medical Center, USA
Kari Jo Harris
Affiliation:
University of Kansas Medical Center, USA
Jasjit S. Ahluwalia
Affiliation:
University of Kansas Medical Center, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The motivational interviewing skills code (MISC) was used to review 86 audiotaped interactions between clinicians and patients participating in a smoking cessation intervention. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were completed for two of the MISC elements: global evaluations and behavior counts. Results indicate 75% of the global ratings yielded ICCs in the good to excellent range, while only 44% of the behavior counts yielded this level of accuracy. Adherence scores were created to form overall ratings of clinician adherence to using motivational interviewing and 80% of these competence measures yielded ICCs in the good to excellent range. Specific recommendations regarding modifications for the MISC are suggested based on the data presented.

Keywords

Motivational interviewingreliabilitytreatment integrity
Type
Clinical Section
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 177 - 184
Copyright
2003 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.