Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-12T07:39:51.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yes, but it was never just about the science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2003

Craig T. Palmer
Craig T. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80933 cpalmer@concentric.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Andrews et al. present a clear discussion of the various criteria needed to identify adaptations. However, they also imply a history of the debate between adaptationists and their critics that is incomplete. The history implied is one of only genuine scientific disagreement. This neglects the role of nonscientific motives and strawman arguments on behalf of the critics of adaptationists.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , August 2002 , pp. 523 - 524
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press