Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T19:10:24.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What about phonological facilitation, response-set membership, and phonological coactivation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Peter A. Starreveld  and
Wido La Heij
Peter A. Starreveld
Affiliation:
Unit of Experimental and Theoretical Psychology, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlandsstarreve@rulfsw.leidenuniv.nllahey@rulfsw.leidenuniv.nl www.fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Wido La Heij
Affiliation:
Unit of Experimental and Theoretical Psychology, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlandsstarreve@rulfsw.leidenuniv.nllahey@rulfsw.leidenuniv.nl www.fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss two inconsistencies between Levelt et al.'s model and existing theory about, and data from, picture-word experiments. These inconsistencies show that the empirical support for weaver++ is much weaker than Levelt et al. suggest. We close with a discussion of the proposed explanation for phonological coactivation of near synonyms of a target word.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 56 - 58
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press