Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T20:58:55.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A viable alternative to null-hypothesis testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1998

Bruno D. Zumbo
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and of Mathematics, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, B.C. V2N 4Z9, Canada zumbob@unbc.ca quarles.unbc.ca./psyc.edgeworth2.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This commentary advocates an alternative to null-hypothesis testing that was originally represented by Rozeboom over three decades ago yet is not considered by Chow (1996). The central distinguishing feature of this approach is that it allows the scientist to conclude that the data are much better fit by those hypotheses whose values fall inside the interval than by those outside.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press