Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T21:06:44.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

the trade-off between symmetry and asymmetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2005

michael c. corballis
Affiliation:
department of psychology, university of auckland, private bag 92019, auckland 1001, new zealandm.corballis@auckland.ac.nz http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

population-level asymmetry may be maintained, not by an “evolutionarily stable strategy” pitting a dominant bias against its nondominant opposite, but rather by a genetically based system pitting a directional bias against the absence of any such bias. stability is then achieved through a heterozygotic advantage, maintaining balanced polymorphism. this model may better capture the fundamental trade-off between lateralization and bilateral symmetry.

Type
open peer commentary
Copyright
2005 cambridge university press