Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T11:07:38.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

To have and to eat cake: The biscriptive role of game-theoretic explanations of human choice behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2003

William D. Casebeer*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO80840http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfpfa/CVs/Casebeer.html
James E. Parco*
Affiliation:
American Embassy, Tel Aviv, 63903Israelhttp://parco.usafa.biz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Game-theoretic explanations of behavior need supplementation to be descriptive; behavior has multiple causes, only some governed by traditional rationality. An evolutionarily informed theory of action countenances overlapping causal domains: neurobiological, psychological, and rational. Colman's discussion is insufficient because he neither evaluates learning models nor qualifies under what conditions his propositions hold. Still, inability to incorporate emotions in axiomatic models highlights the need for a comprehensive theory of functional rationality.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003