Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T17:27:28.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A theory of lexical access in speech production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Willem J. M. Levelt
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlandspim@mpi.nl www.mpi.nl
Ardi Roelofs
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdoma.roelofs@exeter.ac.uk
Antje S. Meyer
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlandsasmeyer@mpi.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Preparing words in speech production is normally a fast and accurate process. We generate them two or three per second in fluent conversation; and overtly naming a clear picture of an object can easily be initiated within 600 msec after picture onset. The underlying process, however, is exceedingly complex. The theory reviewed in this target article analyzes this process as staged and feedforward. After a first stage of conceptual preparation, word generation proceeds through lexical selection, morphological and phonological encoding, phonetic encoding, and articulation itself. In addition, the speaker exerts some degree of output control, by monitoring of self-produced internal and overt speech. The core of the theory, ranging from lexical selection to the initiation of phonetic encoding, is captured in a computational model, called weaver++. Both the theory and the computational model have been developed in interaction with reaction time experiments, particularly in picture naming or related word production paradigms, with the aim of accounting for the real-time processing in normal word production. A comprehensive review of theory, model, and experiments is presented. The model can handle some of the main observations in the domain of speech errors (the major empirical domain for most other theories of lexical access), and the theory opens new ways of approaching the cerebral organization of speech production by way of high-temporal-resolution imaging.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press