Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-21T00:49:02.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tactics in theory of mind research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Jesse E. Purdy  and
Michael Domjan
Jesse E. Purdy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Southwestern University, Georgetown, TX 78626 purdy@ralph.southwestern.edu
Michael Domjan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 domjan@psy.utexas.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Progress in the “theory of mind” debate would be better served at this point by abandoning the search for a perfect “critical experiment” and developing an incremental research program based on a systematic theory of “theory of mind.” Studies using the goggle procedure advocated by Heyes should dissociate the ability to see from possible behavioral artifacts of “blind” trainers.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 129 - 130
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press