No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The sociobiology of sociopathy: An alternative hypothesis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2004
Abstract:
Mealey argued that sociopathy is an evolutionary stable strategy subject to frequency-dependent selection – high levels of sociopathy being advantageous to the individual if population-wide frequencies of it are low, and vice versa. I argue that at least one alternative hypothesis exists that explains her data equally well. Alternative hypotheses must be formulated and tested before any theory can be validated.
- Type
- Continuing Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004
References
Broadhurst, P. L. & Jinks, J. L. (1974) What genetical architecture can tell us about the natural selection of behavioural traits. In: The genetics of behaviour, ed. van Abeelen, J. H. F. North-Holland. [WEC]Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H., O’Riain, M. J., Brotherton, P. N. M., Gaynor, D., Kansky, R., Griffin, A. S. & Manser, M. (1999) Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 284:1640–44. [WEC]Google Scholar
Crusio, W. E. (1991) No evolution without genetic variation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:267. [WEC]Google Scholar
Crusio, W. E. (1995) The sociopathy of sociobiology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18(3):552. [WEC]Google Scholar
Crusio, W. E. (2000) An introduction to quantitative genetics. In: Neurobehavioral genetics: Methods and applications, ed. Jones, B. C. & Mormède, P. CRC Press. [WEC]Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1995) Male nipples and clitoral ripples. In: Adam's navel. Penguin. [WEC]Google Scholar
Mealey, L. (1995) The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18(3):523–41. [WEC]Google Scholar
Thornhill, N. W. (1991a) An evolutionary analysis of rules regulating human inbreeding and marriage. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:247–61. [WEC]Google Scholar
Thornhill, N. W. (1991b) Mental mechanisms underlying inbreeding rule making. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:281–93. [WEC]Google Scholar