Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T01:52:38.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selecting is not abstracting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 1999

Stellan Ohlsson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607 stellan@uic.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Barsalou's hypothesis that mental representations are constructed by selecting parts of percepts encounters the same difficulties as other empiricist theories: They cannot explain concepts for which instances do not share perceptible features (e.g., furniture) or for which there are no relevant percepts (e.g., the end of time). Barsalou's attempt to reduce falsity to failed pattern matching is an elementary error, and the generativity of his simulators cannot be attained without nonterminal symbols. There is not now, and there never was, any reason to be interested in empiricist theories of knowledge. Abstraction is a fundamental aspect of human cognition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press