Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T16:09:23.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scientific psychology and tenure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2007

James M. Clark*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 2E9, Canada www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ceci et al. draw conclusions that are inaccurate, analyze and report results inappropriately, fail to translate their scale into policy-relevant terms, and draw overly strong conclusions from their single study. They also attribute all the ills of academic appointments to tenure, and ignore problems with other aspects of the system. Their conclusion that tenure is not supported is at best premature.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007