Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T16:59:16.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The preservation of academic freedom: Tenure is not enough

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2007

Elizabeth A. Franz  and
Harlene Hayne
Elizabeth A. Franz*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand http://psy.otago.ac.nz/staff/franz.html http://psy.otago.ac.nz/staff/hayne.html
Harlene Hayne*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand http://psy.otago.ac.nz/staff/franz.html http://psy.otago.ac.nz/staff/hayne.html
*
5269lfranz@psy.otago.ac.nz
hayne@psy.otago.ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The original purpose of tenure has become clouded by the process by which it is granted. In New Zealand, tenure and academic freedom are separate, with academic freedom protected by legislation. Clearly, tenure is neither necessary nor sufficient to protect academic freedom. Individuals and universities must do more to guard academic freedom in order to encourage, nurture, and protect it.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2006 , pp. 576 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007