Hostname: page-component-66644f4456-vjjx6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T00:30:05.905Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plus maze experiments and the boundary conditions of the dynamic field model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Melissa Burns  and
Michael Domjan
Melissa Burns
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129 m.burns@tcu.edu www.psy.tcu.edu/psy/burns.html
Michael Domjan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 domjan@psy.utexas.edu www.psy.utexas.edu/psy/faculty/domjan.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the dynamic field model, parametric variations of the same general processes predict how infants reach for a goal. Animal learning investigators argue that locating a goal is the product of qualitatively different mechanisms (response learning and place learning) Response versus place learning experiments suggest limitations to the dynamic field model hut where those limitations begin or end is unclear.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 35 - 36
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press