Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T21:16:00.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Play to learn, teach by play

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Elisabetta Palagi
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, University of Pisa, 56011 Calci, Pisa, Italy. elisabetta.palagi@unipi.ithttp://unimap.unipi.it/cercapersone/cercapersone.php Unit of Cognitive Primatology & Primate Center, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies CNR, 00197 Rome, Italy.
Roscoe Stanyon
Affiliation:
Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Biology, University of Florence, 50122 Florence, Italy. roscoe.stanyon@unifi.ithttp://www.bio.unifi.it
Elisa Demuru
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, University of Pisa, 56011 Calci, Pisa, Italy. elisabetta.palagi@unipi.ithttp://unimap.unipi.it/cercapersone/cercapersone.php Department of Bioscience, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy. elidemu@yahoo.ithttp://www.bioscienze.unipr.it/it

Abstract

The synthesis provided by Kline in the target article is noteworthy, but ignores the inseparable role of play in the evolution of learning and teaching in both humans and other animals. Play is distinguished and advantaged by its positive feedback reinforcement through pleasure. Play, especially between adults and infants, is probably the platform from which human learning and teaching evolved.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Play is older than culture, for culture, however inadequately defined, always presupposes human society, and animals have not waited for man to teach them their playing.

— from Homo Ludens (Huizinga Reference Huizinga1938/1949)

Kline provides a commendable synthesis, valuable for designing future research on learning and teaching both cross-culturally and across species. Kline ties teaching and learning to the cognitive, social, and cultural evolution of humans. However, although Kline claims to have incorporated “all known teaching mechanisms in humans and other animals into a cohesive theoretical framework” (sect. 3, para. 2), the role of social play is virtually ignored.

Play only seemingly serves no function and has no apparent, immediate benefits, but the incredible phylogenetic depth of play strongly suggests that play is a functional and adaptive behavior (Burghardt Reference Burghardt2005). It is well appreciated that play facilitates learning in humans, and it is thought that learning is a key explanation and function of play across the animal kingdom (Pellegrini Reference Pellegrini2011; Pellis & Pellis Reference Pellis and Pellis2009).

Many lines of evidence point to social play as a prime building block for the evolution of both learning and teaching. Play, in human and nonhuman infants, provides opportunities for the acquisition of relevant stimuli, for the diffusion of social and environmental knowledge, and for the development of fundamental cognitive and communicative capacities (Power Reference Power2000). Play reduces spatial separation between individuals (Macaca tonkeana, Palagi et al. Reference Palagi, Dall'Olio, Demuru and Stanyon2014) and increases cooperation and empathic proclivity (Pan paniscus, Demuru & Palagi Reference Demuru and Palagi2012; Theropithecus gelada, Palagi et al. Reference Palagi, Leone, Mancini and Ferrari2009). Play renders individuals more competent in the emotional domain (Pellis & Pellis Reference Pellis and Pellis2009), thus creating favorable conditions for learning and teaching (Ciani et al. Reference Ciani, Dall'Olio, Stanyon and Palagi2012). In brief, play cannot be separated from learning, and is a ready-built platform from which to launch teaching.

What differentiates play from other forms of teaching and learning is the positive reinforcement arising from its pleasurable nature (Lewis & Barton Reference Lewis and Barton2006; Rilling et al. Reference Rilling, Scholz, Preuss, Glasser, Errangi and Behrens2011). Play between adults and infants, in particular, is a behavioral setting in which a “teacher” and a “learner” can be clearly recognized. While benefits always outweigh costs for immature learners, costs for adult teachers are generally high and strongly dependent upon the type of play and on the social environment. In order for teaching to evolve, there should also be benefits for the teacher. For example, teachers may be related to their pupils, or pupils may be future allies or mates (Mancini & Palagi Reference Mancini and Palagi2009). In species characterized by a complex sociality, such as human and nonhuman primates, play between adults and immature subjects can be an important bridge to broaden and strengthen social networks of the adults (Palagi et al. Reference Palagi, Cordoni and Borgognini Tarli2004; Reference Palagi, Paoli and Borgognini Tarli2006).

Social play is a multifaceted behavior with various typologies (Cordoni & Palagi Reference Cordoni and Palagi2011; Palagi Reference Palagi, Coplan and Bowker2014; Palagi & Cordoni Reference Palagi and Cordoni2012), which come in succession in early stages of life and then integrate into one another. Information gathered and lessons learned by playing can later be recruited and tinkered to cope with many other aspects of life. Long-standing data show that the longer the period of development and learning, the more pervasive the social play (Fagen Reference Fagen, Pereira and Fairbanks1993).

Play between mother and offspring is probably both ontogenetically and phylogenetically the first means of teaching and learning. In primates, the role of mothers in the playful exchanges with newborns is fundamental. For example, great ape mothers are responsible for initiating and ending play sessions with offspring in their very first months of life. Later, infants spontaneously become more interactive in initiating new playful interactions with their mothers (Hoff et al. Reference Hoff, Nadler and Maple1981; van Lawick-Goodall Reference van Lawick-Goodall1968). Gradually, newborns are introduced into the social network of the mother (Berman Reference Berman1982). During this period, the mother actively monitors her infant's play sessions and often modifies their content (Power Reference Power2000). The direct, active interventions of the mother decrease as the infant learns to self-regulate and acquires social and emotional competence (Govindarajulu et al. Reference Govindarajulu, Hunte, Vermeer and Horrocks1993; Pellis & Pellis Reference Pellis and Pellis2009). The provision of positive or negative reinforcements by the mother is a form of evaluative feedback (sensu Kline) because it leads to the appropriate management of play by infants.

Over time, the infant's sphere of play extends outward to other kin adults and, in tolerant social systems, even to non-kin adults (Ciani et al. Reference Ciani, Dall'Olio, Stanyon and Palagi2012). In despotic societies, cultural and social knowledge gained by playing is therefore mainly vertical, limited to close kin, whereas in tolerant societies, transmission can also spread horizontally, involving unrelated individuals. Moreover, because unrelated subjects can use different play schemes and modules compared to related subjects, social tolerance enhances the diffusion of behavioral and cultural innovation (Fagen Reference Fagen, Pereira and Fairbanks1993; Huffman et al. Reference Huffman, Leca, Nahallage, Nakagawa, Nakamichi and Sugiura2010). Hence, play is an engine fostering a positive feedback linking tolerance to teaching and learning.

According to Kline, teaching includes specific communicative capacities as behavioral markers or ostensive cues. Similarly, play requires intensive, constant exchanges of ostensive signals and can be actively stimulated. Nonhuman primate research is rich in examples of the capacity of mothers and adults to adapt their communicative schemes to infants. When addressing infants of other females, macaque females (Macaca mulatta) use specific vocalizations to communicate their benign intent, a form of metacommunication (“vocal motherese”; Whitham et al. Reference Whitham, Gerard and Maestripieri2007). Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) use a higher rate of repetitions and sequences of tactile gestures (Luef & Liebal Reference Luef and Liebal2012) when playing with infants. This form of “nonvocal motherese” sustains the development of infant gorillas in the learning process of nonvocal signals, and meets the criteria defining direct active teaching (sensu Kline).

As Kline notes, “the prevalence of teaching in humans and other animals is a contentious issue” (sect. 4.1, para. 1). However, the existence of play in all human societies and across mammalian species is not. This lends credence to our hypothesis that play may be one of the most basal building blocks from which human learning and teaching evolved.

References

Berman, C. M. (1982) The ontogeny of social relationships with group companions among free-ranging infant rhesus monkeys: II. Differentiation and attractiveness. Animal Behaviour 30:163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burghardt, G. M. (2005) The genesis of animal play: Testing the limits. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ciani, F., Dall'Olio, S., Stanyon, R. & Palagi, E. (2012) Social tolerance and adult play in macaque societies: A comparison with different human cultures. Animal Behaviour 84:1313–22.Google Scholar
Cordoni, G. & Palagi, E. (2011) Ontogenetic trajectories of chimpanzee social play: Similarities with humans. PLoS ONE 6:e27344.Google Scholar
Demuru, E. & Palagi, E. (2012) In bonobos yawn contagion is higher among kin and friends. PLoS ONE 7:e49613.Google Scholar
Fagen, R. (1993) Primate juveniles and primate play. In: Juvenile primates, ed. Pereira, M. E. & Fairbanks, L. A., pp. 182–96. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Govindarajulu, P., Hunte, W., Vermeer, L. A. & Horrocks, J. A. (1993) The ontogeny of social play in a feral troop of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus): The function of early play. International Journal of Primatology 14:701–19.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. P., Nadler, R. D. & Maple, T. L. (1981) The development of infant play in a captive group of lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). American Journal of Primatology 1:6572.Google Scholar
Huffman, M. A., Leca, J. B. & Nahallage, C. A. D. (2010) Cultured Japanese macaques: A multidisciplinary approach to stone handling behavior and its implications for the evolution of behavioral traditions in nonhuman primates. In: The Japanese Macaques, ed. Nakagawa, N., Nakamichi, M. & Sugiura, H., pp. 191219. Springer.Google Scholar
Huizinga, J. (1938/1949) Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Vol. 3. Taylor & Francis. (Original work published in 1938).Google Scholar
Lewis, K. P. & Barton, R. A. (2006) Amygdala size and hypothalamus size predict social play frequency in nonhuman primates: A comparative analysis using independent contrasts. Journal of Comparative Psychology 120:3137.Google Scholar
Luef, E. & Liebal, K. (2012) Infant-directed communication in lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla): Do older animals scaffold communicative competence in infants? American Journal of Primatology 74:841–52.Google Scholar
Mancini, G. & Palagi, E. (2009) Play and social dynamics in a captive herd of gelada baboons (Theropithecus gelada). Behavioural Processes 82:286–92.Google Scholar
Palagi, E. (2014) Playing alone and with others: A lesson from animals. In: The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone, ed. Coplan, R. J. & Bowker, J. C., pp. 463–82. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Palagi, E. & Cordoni, G. (2012) The right time to happen: Play developmental divergence in the two Panspecies. PLoS ONE 7:e52767.Google Scholar
Palagi, E., Cordoni, G. & Borgognini Tarli, S. (2004) Immediate and delayed benefits of play behaviour: New evidence from chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Ethology 110:949–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palagi, E., Dall'Olio, S., Demuru, E. & Stanyon, R. (2014) Exploring the evolutionary foundations of empathy: Consolation in monkeys. Evolution and Human Behavior 35:341–49. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palagi, E., Leone, A., Mancini, G. & Ferrari, P. F. (2009) Contagious yawning in gelada baboons as a possible expression of empathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:19262–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palagi, E., Paoli, T. & Borgognini Tarli, S. (2006) Short-term benefits of play behaviour: Conflict prevention in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). International Journal of Primatology 27:1257–70.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., ed. (2011) The Oxford handbook of the development of play. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pellis, S. M. & Pellis, V. C. (2009) The playful brain: Venturing to the limits of neuroscience. Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
Power, T. G. (2000) Play and exploration in children and animals. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rilling, J. K., Scholz, J., Preuss, T. M., Glasser, M. F., Errangi, B. K. & Behrens, T. E. (2011) Differences between chimpanzees and bonobos in neural systems supporting social cognition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7:369–79.Google Scholar
van Lawick-Goodall, J. (1968) The behaviour of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve. Animal Behaviour Monographs 1:161311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, J. C., Gerard, M. S. & Maestripieri, D. (2007) Intended receivers and functional significance of grunt and girney vocalizations in free-ranging female rhesus macaques. Ethology 113:862974.Google Scholar