Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T10:41:56.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

No short cuts to science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Bruce G. Charlton
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, university of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle NE1 7RU, United Kingdombruce.charlton@ncl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Steven Rose regards oversimplification of biology as the supreme sin, inevitably leading to evil consequences, and requiring an unique distortion of scientific practice to avoid it. To avoid this, he proposes a short-cut to scientific knowledge by defining certain areas of biology that are intrinsically flawed. But this achieves only a subordination of science to politics. There are no general-purpose shortcuts for evaluating the validity of theories, and no substitutes for testing specific theories using relevant evidence.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press