Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:18:42.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is neural entrainment to rhythms the basis of social bonding through music?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Jessica A. Grahn
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ONN6A 3K7, Canada. jgrahn@uwo.ca; www.jessicagrahn.com
Anna-Katharina R. Bauer
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX2 6GG, UK. anna-katharina.matke-bauer@psy.ox.ac.uk; http://www.annakatharinabauer.com/ Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 7JX, UK
Anna Zamm
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Quellenstrasse 51, Vienna1100, Austria. zamma@ceu.edu; https://annapzamm.github.io/

Abstract

Music uses the evolutionarily unique temporal sensitivity of the auditory system and its tight coupling to the motor system to create a common neurophysiological clock between individuals that facilitates action coordination. We propose that this shared common clock arises from entrainment to musical rhythms, the process by which partners' brains and bodies become temporally aligned to the same rhythmic pulse.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Many human biological processes – from breathing to walking – are rhythmic. Savage et al. propose entrainment as one neurobiological underpinning of music's social effects. Here, we clarify the concept of entrainment and its neurobiological mechanisms, arguing that entrainment should take the central role in the discussion of music's social origins.

Entrainment is the process by which two – or more – oscillatory (fluctuating) processes become coupled via phase or frequency adjustment (Pikovsky, Rosenblum, & Kurths, Reference Pikovsky, Rosenblum and Kurths2003). When two oscillators are entrained, they are temporally aligned, such as when musicians synchronize to another's tone onsets (Demos, Layeghi, Wanderley, & Palmer, Reference Demos, Layeghi, Wanderley and Palmer2019). This synchronization is sustained beyond direct physical coupling, which differentiates entrainment from resonance, a term that is often (and incorrectly) used interchangeably with entrainment (Helfrich, Breska, & Knight, Reference Helfrich, Breska and Knight2019). In fact, the intention and attention required to maintain behavioral entrainment (Leow, Waclawik, & Grahn, Reference Leow, Waclawik and Grahn2018) may create the “social” nature of the signal: entrainment in musical group contexts is not simply reflexive or the result of unintentional mirroring.

When an individual entrains their actions with an external oscillation – such as the music of a partner – they achieve behavioral synchrony. Growing evidence suggests that behavioral entrainment is governed by neural entrainment, the alignment of rhythmic brain activity to external rhythmic stimuli (for a review, see Lakatos, Gross, & Thut, Reference Lakatos, Gross and Thut2019). For music, neural entrainment may alter auditory perception by guiding attention toward rhythmically salient acoustic events (Henry & Herrmann, Reference Henry and Herrmann2014; Jones, Moynihan, MacKenzie, & Puente, Reference Jones, Moynihan, MacKenzie and Puente2002). Moreover, neural entrainment to perceived rhythms facilitates detection of auditory stimulus features (Bauer, Bleichner, Jaeger, Thorne, & Debener, Reference Bauer, Bleichner, Jaeger, Thorne and Debener2018; Henry & Obleser, Reference Henry and Obleser2012), suggesting that entrainment facilitates more than simply moving along to music.

Merely hearing an auditory rhythm activates motor brain areas (Grahn & Brett, Reference Grahn and Brett2007; Grahn & Rowe, Reference Grahn and Rowe2009; Zatorre, Chen, & Penhune, Reference Zatorre, Chen and Penhune2007), particularly when the rhythm features a salient beat (Grahn & Rowe, Reference Grahn and Rowe2013); a regular, psychologically salient, recurring event in the rhythm. The beat is central to entrainment, as the beat is what people generally synchronize to, and it enables synchronization even to novel music. Perhaps unsurprisingly then, entrainment of neural oscillations to the beat occurs not only in auditory, but also in motor regions (Fujioka, Trainor, Large, & Ross, Reference Fujioka, Trainor, Large and Ross2009, Reference Fujioka, Ross and Trainor2015; Morillon & Baillet, Reference Morillon and Baillet2017). Auditory-motor entrainment may be the neural driver behind moving to music; entrainment of beat-related auditory-motor activity influences behavioral synchronization (Mathias, Zamm, Gianferrara, Ross, & Palmer, Reference Mathias, Zamm, Gianferrara, Ross and Palmer2020; Nozaradan, Zerouali, Peretz, & Mouraux, Reference Nozaradan, Zerouali, Peretz and Mouraux2015). We propose that this tight auditory-motor coupling, translating musical rhythms into action, is critical for group music-making.

Musical partners mutually synchronize auditory and motor brain activity to the sounds that they produce (Müller, Sänger, & Lindenberger, Reference Müller, Sänger and Lindenberger2013; Sänger et al., Reference Sänger, Müller and Lindenberger2012, Reference Sänger, Müller and Lindenberger2013; Zamm et al., Reference Zamm, Debener, Bauer, Bleichner, Demos and Palmer2018). In fact, when two brains are synchronized through electrical stimulation, spontaneous (Pan et al., Reference Pan, Novembre, Song, Zhu and Hu2021) and intentional (Novembre, Knoblich, Dunne, & Keller, Reference Novembre, Knoblich, Dunne and Keller2017) bodily movements also become more synchronized. Moreover, physiological activity is coupled during synchronous musical behavior (Gordon et al., Reference Gordon, Gilboa, Cohen, Milstein, Haimovich, Pinhasi and Siegman2020; Mueller & Lindenberger, Reference Müller and Lindenberger2011). Thus, interpersonal synchrony operates at behavioral, neural, and physiological levels, all of which may support the social effects of synchronous music-making.

Interpersonal synchrony has been suggested to play an evolutionary role in promoting social cohesion (Launay, Tarr, & Dunbar, Reference Launay, Tarr and Dunbar2016) by facilitating trust (Launay, Dean, & Bailes, Reference Launay, Dean and Bailes2013), affiliation (Hove & Risen, Reference Hove and Risen2009), and prosocial behavior (Cirelli, Einarson, & Trainor, Reference Cirelli, Einarson and Trainor2014). Consistent with this view, interpersonal behavioral, physiological, and neural synchrony occur between mothers and infants (for a review, see Wass, Whitehorn, Haresign, Phillips, & Leong, Reference Wass, Whitehorn, Haresign, Phillips and Leong2020), between certain animal species' movements and computer-generated or conspecific rhythms (Cook, Rouse, Wilson, & Reichmuth, Reference Cook, Rouse, Wilson and Reichmuth2013; Lameira, Eerola, & Ravignani, Reference Lameira, Eerola and Ravignani2019; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Iversen, Bregman and Schulz2009). These links between entrainment and social cohesion across adults, children, and certain animals, suggest that entrainment may be the musical feature evolutionarily selected to facilitate bonding.

Interestingly, both infants and animals are poorer at synchronization than adult humans, raising the question of whether precise synchronization and well-honed prediction mechanisms are critical for experiencing the social benefits of interpersonal synchrony, the latter being a central argument of Savage et al. Even adults show a wide range of synchronization abilities (Grahn & Schuit, Reference Grahn and Schuit2012), yet there is little evidence that poor synchronizers – adults or children – do not enjoy dancing or moving to music, nor that they experience less social affiliation afterward. In fact, anecdotally, the social affiliation within an amateur, less synchronized musical group may surpass that of a professional, highly synchronized group. Therefore, bonding can arise in social entrainment contexts regardless of individuals' ability to synchronize accurately. Thus, the ability to experience the social benefits of entrainment in group music-making is not necessarily dependent on accurate entrainment ability.

Overall, auditory entrainment to musical rhythms activates the motor system. During music-making, synchronization of actions, brain rhythms, and physiological activity occurs between musical partners. However, many non-musical behaviors involving entrained actions, such as walking side-by-side (Nessler & Gilliland, Reference Nessler and Gilliland2010), rowing (Cohen, Ejsmond-Frey, Knight, & Dunbar, Reference Cohen, Ejsmond-Frey, Knight and Dunbar2010), and dance (Chauvigné, Walton, Richardson, & Brown, Reference Chauvigné, Walton, Richardson and Brown2019), facilitate interpersonal synchrony of behavior and likely also neural and physiological rhythms. We argue that entrainment – of bodies and minds – is the key evolutionary mechanism underlying the social bonding that arises in music. The highly rhythmic structure of music – which arises from both well-defined temporal and spectral patterns – makes music a superior facilitator of interpersonal synchrony and bonding to other entrained activities; however, this hypothesis remains to be definitively proven. We hope that future research inspired by this special issue will test how group music-making specifically enhances social bonding beyond other forms of interpersonal entrainment.

Acknowledgments

A.-K.R.B. receives funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG: MA 8554/1-1). A.Z. receives funding from European Commission H2020 Marie Skodowska-Curie Fellowship JAL-843722.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Bauer, A.-K. R., Bleichner, M. G., Jaeger, M., Thorne, J. D., & Debener, S. (2018). Dynamic phase alignment of ongoing auditory cortex oscillations. NeuroImage, 167, 396407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauvigné, L. A., Walton, A., Richardson, M. J., & Brown, S. (2019). Multi-person and multisensory synchronization during group dancing. Human Movement Science, 63, 199208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cirelli, L. K., Einarson, K. M., & Trainor, L. J. (2014). Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Developmental Science, 17(6), 10031011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, E. E. A., Ejsmond-Frey, R., Knight, N., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010). Rowers’ high: Behavioural synchrony is correlated with elevated pain thresholds. Biological Letters, 6, 106108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, P., Rouse, A., Wilson, M., & Reichmuth, C. (2013). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) can keep the beat: Motor entrainment to rhythmic auditory stimuli in a non-vocal mimic. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 127(4), 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demos, A. P., Layeghi, H., Wanderley, M. M., & Palmer, C. (2019). Staying together: A bidirectional delay–coupled approach to joint action. Cognitive Science, 43(8), e12766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujioka, T., Ross, B., & Trainor, L. J. (2015). Beta-band oscillations represent auditory beat and its metrical hierarchy in perception and imagery. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(45), 1518715198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujioka, T., Trainor, L. J., Large, E. W., & Ross, B. (2009). Beta and gamma rhythms in human auditory cortex during musical beat processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 8992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, I., Gilboa, A., Cohen, S., Milstein, N., Haimovich, N., Pinhasi, S., & Siegman, S. (2020). Physiological and behavioral synchrony predict group cohesion and performance. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grahn, J. A., & Rowe, J. B. (2009). Feeling the beat: Premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(23), 75407548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grahn, J. A., & Rowe, J. B. (2013). Finding and feeling the musical beat: Striatal dissociations between detection and prediction of regularity. Cerebral Cortex, 23(4), 913921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grahn, J. A., & Schuit, D. (2012). Individual differences in rhythmic ability: Behavioral and neuroimaging investigations. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 22(2), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahn, J., & Brett, M. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 893906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helfrich, R. F., Breska, A., & Knight, R. T. (2019). Neural entrainment and network resonance in support of top-down guided attention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 8289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, M. J., & Herrmann, B. (2014). Low-frequency neural oscillations support dynamic attending in temporal context. Timing & Time Perception, 2, 6286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, M. J., & Obleser, J. (2012). Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(49), 2009520100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social cognition, 27(6), 949960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. R., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science, 13(4), 313319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakatos, P., Gross, J., & Thut, G. (2019). A new unifying account of the roles of neuronal entrainment. Current Biology, 29(18), R890R905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lameira, A. R., Eerola, T., & Ravignani, A. (2019). Coupled whole-body rhythmic entrainment between two chimpanzees. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2013). Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction. Experimental Psychology, 60, 5363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Launay, J., Tarr, B., & Dunbar, R. I. (2016). Synchrony as an adaptive mechanism for large-scale human social bonding. Ethology, 122(10), 779789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, L. A., Waclawik, K., & Grahn, J. A. (2018). The role of attention and intention in synchronization to music: Effects on gait. Experimental Brain Research, 236(1), 99115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathias, B., Zamm, A., Gianferrara, P. G., Ross, B., & Palmer, C. (2020). Rhythm complexity modulates behavioral and neural dynamics during auditory–motor synchronization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(10), 18641880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morillon, B., & Baillet, S. (2017). Motor origin of temporal predictions in auditory attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(42), E8913E8921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, V., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Cardiac and respiratory patterns synchronize between persons during choir singing. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e24893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024893CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, V., Sänger, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2013). Intra- and inter-brain synchronization during musical improvisation on the guitar. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nessler, J. A., & Gilliland, S. J. (2010). Kinematic analysis of side-by-side stepping with intentional and unintentional synchronization. Gait & Posture, 31(4), 527529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novembre, G., Knoblich, G., Dunne, L., & Keller, P. E. (2017). Interpersonal synchrony enhanced through 20 Hz phase-coupled dual brain stimulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(4), 662670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozaradan, S., Zerouali, Y., Peretz, I., & Mouraux, A. (2015). Capturing with EEG the neural entrainment and coupling underlying sensorimotor synchronization to the beat. Cerebral Cortex, 25(3), 736747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y., Novembre, G., Song, B., Zhu, Y., & Hu, Y. (2021). Dual brain stimulation enhances interpersonal learning through spontaneous movement synchrony. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1–2), 210221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, A. D., Iversen, J. R., Bregman, M. R., & Schulz, I. (2009). Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal. Current Biology, 19(10), 827830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., & Kurths, J. (2003). Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences (Vol. 12). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sänger, J., Müller, V., & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Intra- and interbrain synchronization and network properties when playing guitar in duets. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sänger, J., Müller, V., & Lindenberger, U. (2013). Directionality in hyperbrain networks discriminates between leaders and followers in guitar duets. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wass, S. V., Whitehorn, M., Haresign, I. M., Phillips, E., & Leong, V. (2020). Interpersonal neural entrainment during early social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 329342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamm, A., Debener, S., Bauer, A-K.R., Bleichner, M.G., Demos, A.P., & Palmer, C. (2018). Amplitude envelope correlations measure synchronous cortical oscillations in performing musicians. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1423(1), 251263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L., & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 8(7), 547558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed