Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T22:20:03.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implausibility versus misinterpretation of the FLMP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2000

Gregg C. Oden
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 gregg-oden@uiowa.edu www.cs.uiowa.edu/~oden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The case for the independence of featural processing supports Merge and FLMP alike. The target article's criticisms of the latter model are founded on misunderstanding its application to natural language processing. In fact, the main difference in the functional properties of the models is the FLMP's ability to account for graded perceptual experience. @T3:It is startling to be informed that beliefs you have held for a quarter of a century are indefensible and implausible. So it comes as a relief to discover that it was all just a big misunderstanding.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press