Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T07:39:01.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypnotic responding and self-deception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

Irving Kirsch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1020 irvingk@uconnvm.uconn.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As understood by neodissociation and sociocognitive theorists, hypnotic responses are instances of self-deception. Neodissociation theory matches the strict definition of Sackeim and Gur (1978) and sociocognitive theory matches Mele's looser definition. Recent data indicate that many hypnotized individuals deceive themselves into holding conflicting beliefs without dissociating, but others convince themselves that the suggested state of affairs is true without simultaneously holding a contrary belief.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press