Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T20:09:37.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human speech: A tinkerer's delight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1998

Harvey M. Sussman
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics and Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 sussman@mail.utexas.edu
David Fruchter
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 fruchter@mail.utexas.edu
Jon Hilbert
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
Joseph Sirosh
Affiliation:
HNC Software, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121 sirosh@hnc.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The most frequent criticism of the target article is the lack of clear separability of human speech data relative to neuroethological data. A rationalization for this difference was sought in the tinkered nature of such new adaptations as human speech. Basic theoretical premises were defended, and new data were presented to support a claim that speakers maintain a low-noise relationship between F2 transition onset and offset frequencies for stops in pre-vocalic positions through articulatory choices. It remains a viable and testable hypothesis that the phenomenon described by the locus equation is a functional adaptation of production mechanisms to processing preferences of the auditory system.

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press