Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T22:27:29.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

For the short-term: Are women just looking for a few pair of genes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Lynn Carol Miller
Affiliation:
Annenberg School and Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0281 lmiller@rcf.usc.edu
William C. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061 {billp; allisonj; aputcha}@rcf.usc.edu
Allison R. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061 {billp; allisonj; aputcha}@rcf.usc.edu
Anila D. Putcha
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061 {billp; allisonj; aputcha}@rcf.usc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although we find Gangestad & Simpson's argument intriguing, we question some of its underlying assumptions, including: (1) that fluctuating asymmetry (FA) is consistently heritable; (2) that symmetry is driving the effects; (3) that use of parametric tests with FA is appropriate; and (4) that a short-term mating strategy produces more offspring than a long-term strategy.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press