Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T20:28:49.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Steven W. Gangestad
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 sgangest@unm.edu
Jeffry A. Simpson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 jas@psyc.tamu.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During human evolutionary history, there were “trade-offs” between expending time and energy on child-rearing and mating, so both men and women evolved conditional mating strategies guided by cues signaling the circumstances. Many short-term matings might be successful for some men; others might try to find and keep a single mate, investing their effort in rearing her offspring. Recent evidence suggests that men with features signaling genetic benefits to offspring should be preferred by women as short-term mates, but there are trade-offs between a mate's genetic fitness and his willingness to help in child-rearing. It is these circumstances and the cues that signal them that underlie the variation in short- and long-term mating strategies between and within the sexes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press