Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T22:09:56.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Empathy: Each is in the right – hopefully, not all in the wrong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2003

Stephanie D. Preston
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 2RCP – Neurology Clinic, Iowa City, IA 52242 stephanie-d-preston@uiowa.edu http://www.medicine.uiowa.edu/prestonresearch
Frans B. M. de Waal
Affiliation:
Living Links, Yerkes Primate Center and Psychology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 dewaal@rmy.emory.edu http://www.emory.edu/LIVING_LINKS/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Only a broad theory that looks across levels of analysis can encompass the many perspectives on the phenomenon of empathy. We address the major points of our commentators by emphasizing that the basic perception-action process, while automatic, is subject to control and modulation, and is greatly affected by experience and context because of the role of representations. The model can explain why empathy seems phenomenologically more effortful than reflexive, and why there are different levels of empathy across individuals, ages, and species.

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press