Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T00:57:44.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does metacognition necessarily involve metarepresentation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2004

Joëlle Proust
Affiliation:
Institut Jean-Nicod CNRS (Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Ecole Normale Supérieure), 75007 Paris, France; and Max-Planck Institut Für Psychologische Forschung, Münich, Germany jproust@ehess.fr http://joelle.proust.free.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Against the view that metacognition is a capacity that parallels theory of mind, it is argued that metacognition need involve neither metarepresentation nor semantic forms of reflexivity, but only process-reflexivity, through which a task-specific system monitors its own internal feedback by using quantitative cues. Metacognitive activities, however, may be redescribed in metarepresentational, mentalistic terms in species endowed with a theory of mind.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press