Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T10:32:28.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determinism, omniscience, and the multiplicity of explanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Mary Midgley
Affiliation:
Formerly Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England, Newcastle NE2 2JP, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Complete determinism is, as Karl Popper said, “a daydream of omniscience.” Determinism is usually conceived as linked with a particular science whose explanations are deemed fundamental. As Rose rightly points out, biological enquiry includes many different kinds of question. Genetic determinism, making genes central to biology, is therefore biased and misguided. The crucial unit must be the whole organism.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press