Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:53:08.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common or distinct deficits for auditory and visual hallucinations?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2005

Johanna C. Badcock  and
Murray T. Maybery
Johanna C. Badcock*
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, and Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, Graylands Hospital, Claremont, Perth, WA6901, Australia
Murray T. Maybery*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, WA6009, Australia
*
jobad@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
murray@psy.uwa.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The dual-deficit model of visual hallucinations (Collerton et al. target article) is compared with the dual-deficit model of auditory hallucinations (Waters et al., in press). Differences in cognitive mechanisms described may be superficial. Similarities between these models may provide the basis for a general model of complex hallucinations extended across disorders and modalities, involving shared (overlapping) cognitive processes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , December 2005 , pp. 757 - 758
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005