Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T21:08:13.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A clash of competing metaphors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Michael Bradie
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403 mbradie@bgnet.bgsu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Metaphors have three important functions in scientific discourse: heuristic, rhetorical, and epistemic. I argue that, contrary to prevailing opinion, metaphors are indispensable components of scientific methodology as well as scientific communication. Insofar as the choice of metaphors reflects ideological commitments, all science is ideological. The philosophically vexed question is how to characterize the sense in which science is not merely ideological.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press