Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-12T00:16:34.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Choice of mating tactics and constrained optimality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

William M. Baum
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, San Francisco, CA 94108 wm.baum@unh.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Gangestad & Simpson's arguments may be rendered more substantial and precise by capitalizing on research and theory on choice between reinforced response alternatives. An analysis in terms of feedback functions shows that the effects of individual differences in attractiveness may be understood as constraints on optimality and may be reconciled with the previous research and theory that the authors criticize.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press