Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T18:04:16.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

categorization in artificial agents: guidance on empirical research?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2005

william s.-y. wang  and
tao gong
william s.-y. wang
Affiliation:
department of electronic engineering, the chinese university of hong kong, shatin, new territories, hong kong, chinawsywang@ee.cuhk.edu.hk http://www.ee.cuhk.edu.hk/~wsywang/ tgong@ee.cuhk.edu.hk
tao gong
Affiliation:
department of electronic engineering, the chinese university of hong kong, shatin, new territories, hong kong, chinawsywang@ee.cuhk.edu.hk http://www.ee.cuhk.edu.hk/~wsywang/ tgong@ee.cuhk.edu.hk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

by comparing mechanisms in nativism, empiricism, and culturalism, the target article by steels & belpaeme (s&b) emphasizes the influence of communicational constraint on sharing color categories. our commentary suggests deeper considerations of some of their claims, and discusses some modifications that may help in the study of communicational constraints in both humans and robots.

Type
open peer commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , August 2005 , pp. 511 - 512
Copyright
2005 cambridge university press