Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-5ws7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-12T01:43:18.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The case against memory consolidation in REM sleep: Balderdash!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2001

William Fishbein
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The City College and Graduate School of The City University of New York, New York, NY 10031 wfatoffice@aol.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Unfortunately, some researchers think a good scientific theory is one that has been repeatedly confirmed, and a bad theory is one that has not received consistent confirmation. However, confirmation of a theory depends on the extent to which a hypothesis exposes itself to disconfirmation. One confirmation of a highly specific, falsifiable experiment can have a far greater impact than the disconfirmation of twenty experiments that are virtually unfalsifiable. This commentary (1) counteracts misleading biases regarding the REM sleep/memory consolidation theory, and (2) demonstrates how chaotic cerebral activation during sleep is an essential component of long-term memory storage processes.

[Vertes & Eastman]

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press