Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T19:18:06.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The case against distributed representations: Lack of evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Simon Farrell  and
Stephan Lewandowsky
Simon Farrell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, W.A. 6907, Australia{simon; lewan}@psy.uwa.edu.auwww.psy.uwa.edu.au/user/{simon; lewan}
Stephan Lewandowsky
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, W.A. 6907, Australia{simon; lewan}@psy.uwa.edu.auwww.psy.uwa.edu.au/user/{simon; lewan}
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We focus on two components of Page's argument in favour of localist representations in connectionist networks: First, we take issue with the claim that localist representations can give rise to generalisation and show that whenever generalisation occurs, distributed representations are involved. Second, we counter the alleged shortcomings of distributed representations and show that their properties are preferable to those of localist approaches.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2000 , pp. 476 - 477
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press