Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T14:08:13.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

At least some electrophysiological and behavioural data cannot be reconciled with the planning–control model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

P. Paolo Battaglini*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Patologia and BRAIN Center for Neuroscience, Università di Trieste, 34143Trieste, Italyhttp://www.units.it/~brain/
Paolo Bernardis*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Psicologia and BRAIN Center for Neuroscience, Università di Trieste, 34143Trieste, Italy
Nicola Bruno*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Psicologia and BRAIN Center for Neuroscience, Università di Trieste, 34143Trieste, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The planning/control distinction is an important tool in the study of sensorimotor transformations. However, published data from our laboratories suggest that, contrary to what is predicted by the proposed model, (1) structures in the superior parietal lobe of both monkeys and humans can be involved in movement planning; and (2) fast pointing actions can be immune to visual illusions even if they are performed without visual feedback. The planning–control model as proposed by Glover is almost certainly too schematic.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004