Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T21:18:09.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are there nontrivial constraints on colour categorization?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

B. A. C. Saunders
Affiliation:
Centre for Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgiumpop00127@cc5.kuleuven.ac.be
J. van Brakel
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this target article the following hypotheses are discussed: (1) Colour is autonomous: a perceptuolinguistic and behavioural universal. (2) It is completely described by three independent attributes: hue, brightness, and saturation: (3) Phenomenologically and psychophysically there are four unique hues: red, green, blue, and yellow; (4) The unique hues are underpinned by two opponent psychophysical and/or neuronal channels: red/green, blue/yellow. The relevant literature is reviewed. We conclude: (i) Psychophysics and neurophysiology fail to set nontrivial constraints on colour categorization. (ii) Linguistic evidence provides no grounds for the universality of basic colour categories. (iii) Neither the opponent hues red/green, blue/yellow nor hue, brightness, and saturation are intrinsic to a universal concept of colour. (iv) Colour is not autonomous.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1997 Cambridge University Press