Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T22:28:31.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anatomical structure alone cannot predict function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Dieter Jaeger
Affiliation:
Division of Biology 216-76, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 dieter@bbb.caltech.edu
Erik De Schutter
Affiliation:
Born-Bunge Foundation, University of Antwerp-UIA, B2610 Antwerp, Belgiumerik@bbf.uia.ac.bebbfwww.uia.ac.be/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The central hypothesis of Braitenberg et al.'s target article – that tidal waves of parallel fiber excitation precisely activate Purkinje cell spiking – is hard to reconcile with recent neurophysiological and modeling data. The assumed pattern of mossy fiber input seems unrealistic, inhibition is likely to interfere with the proposed excitatory responses, and moreover, computer simulations show that the Purkinje cell is a poor coincidence detector.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
1997 Cambridge University Press