Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T22:27:41.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyses of mating differences within-sex and between-sex are complementary, not competing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Todd K. Shackelford ,
Gregory J. LeBlanc ,
Richard L. Michalski  and
Viviana A. Weekes
Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Division of Science-Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 {tshackel; gleb2044; rmic5640; vwee9812}@fau.edu
Gregory J. LeBlanc
Affiliation:
Division of Science-Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 {tshackel; gleb2044; rmic5640; vwee9812}@fau.edu
Richard L. Michalski
Affiliation:
Division of Science-Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 {tshackel; gleb2044; rmic5640; vwee9812}@fau.edu
Viviana A. Weekes
Affiliation:
Division of Science-Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 {tshackel; gleb2044; rmic5640; vwee9812}@fau.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Analyses of between-sex differences have provided a powerful starting point for evolutionarily informed work on human sexuality. This early work set the stage for an evolutionary analysis of within-sex differences in human sexuality. A comprehensive theory of human sexual strategies must address both between-sex differences and within-sex differences in evolved psychology and manifest behavior.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2000 , pp. 621
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press