Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T03:36:07.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

adhd theories still need to take more on board: serotonin and pre-executive variability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2005

robert d. oades
Affiliation:
university clinic for child and adolescent psychiatry, 45147 essen, germanyoades@uni-essen.dehanna.christiansen@uni-essen.de http://www.biopsychology.uni-essen.de
hanna christiansen
Affiliation:
university clinic for child and adolescent psychiatry, 45147 essen, germanyoades@uni-essen.dehanna.christiansen@uni-essen.de http://www.biopsychology.uni-essen.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

correcting the relationship between tonic and burst firing modes in dopamine neurons may help normalise stimulus-reinforcement gradients and contingent behaviour in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (adhd) children. but appropriate evaluations of stimuli for developing adaptive plans and controlling impulsivity will not occur without moderating the gain-like functions of serotonin. the “dynamic theory” correctly highlights the need to account for variability in adhd. the dysmaturation of pre-executive information processing is proposed as an explanation.

at the core of the article by sagvolden and colleagues there is a set of data that throws light on an aspect of the adhd phenomenon. but one asks if the authors are a measure too brave to generalise so broadly from the unusually steep reinforcement gradients reported for the human condition and an animal model to the syndrome as a whole.

Type
open peer commentary
Copyright
© 2005 cambridge university press