Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T05:21:08.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Word versus task representation in neural networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1999

Thomas Elbert ,
Christian Dobell ,
Alessandro Angrilli ,
Luciano Stegagno  and
Brigitte Rockstroh
Thomas Elbert
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, D-78457 Konstanz, Germanythomas.elbert@uni-konstanz.de
Christian Dobell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, D-78457 Konstanz, Germanythomas.elbert@uni-konstanz.de
Alessandro Angrilli
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, D-78457 Konstanz, Germanythomas.elbert@uni-konstanz.de Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, 35100 Padua, Italy
Luciano Stegagno
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, 35100 Padua, Italy
Brigitte Rockstroh
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, D-78457 Konstanz, Germanythomas.elbert@uni-konstanz.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Hebbian view of word representation is challenged by findings of task (level of processing)-dependent, event-related potential patterns that do not support the notion of a fixed set of neurons representing a given word. With cross-language phonological reliability encoding more asymmetrical left hemisphere activity is evoked than with word comprehension. This suggests a dynamical view of the brain as a self-organizing, connectivity-adjusting system.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , April 1999 , pp. 286 - 287
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press