Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T00:21:21.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some problems with the lexical status of nondefault inflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1999

Peter Indefrey
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics, NL-6521 XL Nijmegen, The Netherlandsindefrey@mpi.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Clahsen's characterization of nondefault inflection as based exclusively on lexical entries does not capture the full range of empirical data on German inflection. In the verb system differential effects of lexical frequency seem to be input-related rather than affecting morphological production. In the noun system, the generalization properties of -n and -e plurals exceed mere analogy-based productivity.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press