Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T00:30:13.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The neuron doctrine is an insult to neurons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Stuart Hameroff
Affiliation:
Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724 hameroff@u.arizona.edu www.u.arizona.edu/~hameroff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As presently implemented, the neuron doctrine (ND) portrays the brain's neurons and chemical synapses as fundamental components in a computer-like switching circuit, supporting a view of brain = mind = computer. However, close examination reveals individual neurons to be far more complex than simple switches, with enormous capacity for intracellular information processing (e.g., in the internal cytoskeleton). Other poorly appreciated factors (gap junctions, apparent randomness, dendritic-dendritic processing, possible quantum computation, the living state) also suggest that the ND grossly oversimplifies neuronal functions. In the quest to understand consciousness, the presently implemented ND may throw out the baby with the bath water.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press