Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T01:16:18.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dual-mechanism model of inflectional morphology: A connectionist critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1999

Marc F. Joanisse  and
Todd R. Haskell
Marc F. Joanisse
Affiliation:
Neuroscience Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2520 {marcj; thaskell}@gizmo.usc.edu www-scf.usc.edu/~marcj siva.usc.edu/~thaskell
Todd R. Haskell
Affiliation:
Neuroscience Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2520 {marcj; thaskell}@gizmo.usc.edu www-scf.usc.edu/~marcj siva.usc.edu/~thaskell
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Clahsen has added to the body of evidence that, on average, regular and irregular inflected words behave differently. However, the dual-mechanism account he supports predicts a crisp distinction; the empirical data instead suggest a fuzzy one, more in line with single-mechanism connectionist models.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , December 1999 , pp. 1026 - 1027
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press