Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T01:51:17.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bihemispheric representation, foveal splitting, and visual word recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1999

Richard Shillcock  and
Padraic Monaghan
Richard Shillcock
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9LW Scotlandrcs@cogsci.ed.ac.ukpmon@cogsci.ed.ac.uk www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ccs/people/who/rcs www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ccs/people/who/pmon
Padraic Monaghan
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9LW Scotlandrcs@cogsci.ed.ac.ukpmon@cogsci.ed.ac.uk www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ccs/people/who/rcs www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ccs/people/who/pmon
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pulvermüller's account of lexical representation has implications for visual word recognition, given the claim we make that a foveally presented word is precisely split and contralaterally projected to the two hemispheres, and that this splitting conditions the whole process of visual word recognition. This elaboration of Pulvermüller's account raises issues of hemispheric differences and collaboration.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , April 1999 , pp. 300 - 301
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press