Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dkgms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-17T07:09:31.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ushering in the New Normal: Viability and Informal Community Leadership in Fukushima Ten Years After 3.11

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

March 11, 2021 marked the tenth anniversary of Japan’s triple disaster of 2011. Residents of Fukushima towns which endured the greatest environmental, social, and economic impact of the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident have lived with uncertainty about the future for a full decade. Major infrastructure projects are fully or nearly complete, and decontamination efforts in reopened towns have largely concluded. Nevertheless, evacuee return rates have been low in most towns which had been placed under full evacuation orders. As a result, the current populations of many affected towns are less than 20% of their pre-disaster levels, and the majority of current residents over 65 years of age. Despite the huge challenges, the energy and know-how of the people of Fukushima are tremendous resources. Many see the possibility of new forms of long-term viability that capitalize on technology, the age of the population, and the ready availability of land and other resources. What has been achieved so far in realizing these visions has been made possible by an emergent network of informal community leaders, who display a charismatic, soft leadership style.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

References

Bonner, S., Brown, A., Dolezal, N., Franken, P., and Moross, J. (2016) ‘Safecast: successful citizen-science for radiation measurement and communication after Fukushima’, Journal of Radiological Protection, 36(2) [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Brown, S.A. (2021) ‘The Closely-Watched Case of Iitate Village: The Need for Global Communication of Local Problems’ in Cleveland, K., Knowles, S.G., Shineha, R. (ed.) Legacies of Fukushima: 3.11 In Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 197210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iitate Village. (2021). 2021-06-01 Genzai no hinan jōhō [2021-06-01 Current evacuation information] [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Madei Garden Village Co., LTD. (2019). Michinoeki Madeikan English Guide [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Odaka Pioneer Village. (2020). Odaka Pioneer Village [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Safecast. (2021). Safecast [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Safecast (2021). SAFECAST 10 - Live from Fukushima, Around the Globe [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Safecast Map (2014). Safecast Map [Online]. Available at: https://map.safecast.org/ (Accessed: 14 June 2021)Google Scholar
Safecast TV. (2021). How’s The Food? - With Yoichi Tao - SAFECAST 10 v02 [Online video]. April 7. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Suganuma, E. (2020) ‘Priest trained in nuclear physics to lead village hit by 2011 disaster’, The Asahi Shimbun, 26 October [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
The Great East Japan Earthquake and Nuclear Disaster Memorial Museum. (2020). The Great East Japan Earthquake and Nuclear Disaster Memorial Museum [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
Yamakawa, T. (2020) ‘Fukushima ītatemura sansai no seshiumu osen wa ima (2020-nen haru)’ [Fukushima/Iitate Village wild plants are contaminated with cesium now (Spring 2020)], Tokyo Shimbun, 27 May [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar
ZDFheute. (2021). Fukushima zehn Jahre nach der Katastrophe [Online video]. February 2. [Online]. Accessed: June 14, 2021.Google Scholar